Rep. Raul Labrador Will Challenge Kevin McCarthy for GOP Leader

There will be a race for Eric Cantor’s job afterall.

Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID), speaks at the Conservative Political Action conference (CPAC), on February 10, 2011 in Washington, DC. The CPAC annual gathering is a project of the American Conservative Union. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
June 13, 2014, 9:32 a.m.

Rep. Raul Lab­rador, a fiery con­ser­vat­ive law­maker from Idaho, will chal­lenge House Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy in next Thursday’s spe­cial elec­tion to re­place Eric Can­tor as ma­jor­ity lead­er, ac­cord­ing to Re­pub­lic­an sources.

“I want a House Lead­er­ship team that re­flects the best of our con­fer­ence,” Lab­rador said in a state­ment provided to Na­tion­al Journ­al. He later ad­ded: “I am run­ning for Ma­jor­ity Lead­er be­cause I want to help cre­ate a vis­ion of growth and op­por­tun­ity for every­one and start get­ting to work for the Amer­ic­an people.”

A sopho­more rep­res­ent­at­ive from a heav­ily Re­pub­lic­an dis­trict, Lab­rador’s elec­tion would dra­mat­ic­ally al­ter the dy­nam­ic atop the House GOP. The former im­mig­ra­tion at­tor­ney is His­pan­ic and bi­lin­gual, and would add di­versity to an all-white lead­er­ship team. Lab­rador is also a mem­ber of the enorm­ous 2010 class, the mem­bers of which pushed the GOP in­to the ma­jor­ity — but have felt largely un­rep­res­en­ted since.

“I was stunned when Eric Can­tor lost his primary elec­tion earli­er this week,” Lab­rador said. “Eric is a good friend and I have tre­mend­ous re­spect for him. But the mes­sage from Tues­day is clear — Amer­ic­ans are look­ing for a change in the status quo.”

Lab­rador, however, enters the race as a de­cided un­der­dog, as Mc­Carthy and his seasoned vote-count­ing op­er­a­tion have been work­ing around the clock since Wed­nes­day se­cur­ing com­mit­ments from mem­bers of the House GOP.

It’s un­clear, in fact, wheth­er Lab­rador ac­tu­ally thinks he can win. As he pondered the race on Thursday even­ing, con­ser­vat­ives who know Lab­rador spec­u­lated that his en­trance would be less about beat­ing Mc­Carthy and more about prov­ing a point. The Idaho Re­pub­lic­an fre­quently cri­ti­cizes the GOP lead­er­ship team — dom­in­ated by mem­bers from blue and purple states — for not rep­res­ent­ing the geo­graph­ic­al or ideo­lo­gic­al com­pos­i­tion of the con­fer­ence. With a power­ful lead­er­ship spot now open, Lab­rador couldn’t bear the idea of Mc­Carthy mov­ing up un­con­tested.

“He thinks some­body needs to step up and at least give con­ser­vat­ives a choice,” said a well-con­nec­ted Wash­ing­ton Re­pub­lic­an who knows Lab­rador well.

With none of the favored con­ser­vat­ive can­did­ates jump­ing in — Reps. Jeb Hensarling, Jim Jordan and Tom Price all passed on the lead­er’s race — and Rep. Pete Ses­sions ab­ruptly drop­ping his chal­lenge to Mc­Carthy on Thursday, the va­cu­um was too tempt­ing for Lab­rador to res­ist.

One GOP law­maker who is close with Lab­rador said the Idaho Re­pub­lic­an “can’t stand” Mc­Carthy, and was angered at the no­tion of the ma­jor­ity whip earn­ing a pro­mo­tion by ac­cli­ma­tion. Still, the Re­pub­lic­an mem­ber, who asked not to be iden­ti­fied, said Lab­rador har­bors no il­lu­sions that a vic­tory is pos­sible next Thursday.

“Raul isn’t run­ning to win. Raul is run­ning to prove a point,” the mem­ber said.

Still, con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ists and out­side groups who spent Thursday be­moan­ing their lack of a can­did­ate were re-en­er­gized by the pro­spect of Lab­rador’s can­did­acy — and won’t let him go down without a fight. The tea party-al­lied group Freedom­Works launched a cam­paign for Lab­rador Fri­day morn­ing — be­fore his de­cision was even fi­nal­ized — and urged act­iv­ists to call their rep­res­ent­at­ives on his be­half.

“Amer­ic­ans de­serve a choice in lead­er­ship, and Re­pub­lic­ans should have learned by now that ‘the next guy in line’ isn’t en­titled to the next rung on the lad­der,” said Freedom­Works pres­id­ent Matt Kibbe. “Raul Lab­rador is the per­fect lead­er­ship choice for con­sti­tu­tion­al con­ser­vat­ives who are ready to shake things up in Con­gress. He has an au­then­t­ic com­mit­ment to re­ject­ing spe­cial in­terests, and de­fend­ing lim­ited gov­ern­ment.”

But Lab­rador may not be­ne­fit much from the sup­port of the power­ful out­side groups. Thursday’s spe­cial elec­tion is secret-bal­lot, de­priving the groups of key-vot­ing the con­test in an at­tempt to hold mem­bers ac­count­able for their choice of lead­er­ship.

Lab­rador owes much of his celebrity to im­mig­ra­tion, his sig­na­ture is­sue, on which he oc­cu­pies a tricky middle ground between the anti-am­nesty wing of his party and those push­ing for a com­pre­hens­ive re­form pack­age. Lab­rador is com­fort­able with the idea of provid­ing leg­al status to some un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants, and per­haps even cit­izen­ship — but only after a mus­cu­lar set of “trig­gers” are in place to en­sure the bor­der is se­cured and in­tern­al en­force­ment meas­ures are in place. That way, Lab­rador has said, voters know “we won’t have to deal with this is­sue again.”

Ori­gin­ally part of a bi­par­tis­an House group work­ing to craft an im­mig­ra­tion pack­age, Lab­rador dropped out after the mem­bers could not re­con­cile dif­fer­ing views over health care cov­er­age for cur­rent il­leg­al im­mig­rants.

That will­ing­ness to stand for prin­ciple — even when it makes him an en­emy of power­ful law­makers in his own party — is what im­me­di­ately en­deared Lab­rador to lead­ing con­ser­vat­ives in the House. “He knows what he be­lieves, and he came here and stood firmly for it,” Rep. Jim Jordan, a lead­er of the GOP’s right flank, said of Lab­rador last year. “That car­ries a lot of re­spect.”

Lab­rador has nev­er run for a lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion be­fore, but he did re­ceive a single vote in 2013 for speak­er of the House — from his close friend, Rep. Justin Amash.

Amash im­me­di­ately took to Twit­ter fol­low­ing Lab­rador’s an­nounce­ment, and urged fol­low­ers to keep track of who Re­pub­lic­an rep­res­ent­at­ives will vote for in the elec­tion.

What We're Following See More »
WORDS AND PICTURES
White House Looks Back on bin Laden Mission
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NO BATTLE OVER SEATTLE
SCOTUS Won’t Hear Appeal of Minimum-Wage Law
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a sweeping constitutional challenge to Seattle’s minimum wage law, in what could have been a test case for future legal attacks on similar measures across the country. In a one-line order, the justices declined to hear a case by the International Franchise Association and a group of Seattle franchisees, which had said in court papers that the city’s gradual wage increase to $15 discriminates against them in a way that violates the Constitution’s commerce clause."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN JUNE
DC to Release Draft Constitution as Part of Statehood Push
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The New Columbia Statehood Commission—composed of five District leaders including Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and D.C.'s congressional delegation—voted today to publicly release a draft of a new constitution for an eventual state next Friday, at the Lincoln Cottage." It's the first step in a statehood push this year that will include a constitutional convention in June and a referendum in November.

Source:
ALZHEIMER’S OUTCRY
Will Ferrell Bails on Reagan Movie
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Amid outcry by President Reagan's children, actor Will Ferrell has pulled out of a movie that makes light of Reagan's Alzheimer's disease. A spokesperson for Ferrell said, “The ‘Reagan’ script is one of a number of scripts that had been submitted to Will Ferrell which he had considered. While it is by no means an ‘Alzheimer’s comedy’ as has been suggested, Mr. Ferrell is not pursuing this project."

Source:
×