Relax, There’s No Federal Ban on Artisanal Cheese

The FDA says it’s not prohibiting the use of wooden shelves to age cheese. But it’s still not happy about it.

National Journal
Marina Koren
June 12, 2014, 11:44 a.m.

It’s been a whirl­wind week for the ar­tis­an­al cheese makers of Amer­ica.

Over the week­end, the in­dustry learned of some Janu­ary cor­res­pond­ence from the Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion that sug­ges­ted the agency was ban­ning the use of wooden shelves to age cheese, a cen­tur­ies-old prac­tice. “A sense of dis­be­lief and dis­tress is quickly rip­pling through the U.S. ar­tis­an cheese com­munity,” Jeanne Car­penter, a Wis­con­sin cheese-in­dustry ad­voc­ate, wrote.

Cheese makers across the coun­try took to so­cial me­dia to rail against the sup­posed ban, lead­ing to the birth of #sa­ve­our­cheese.

Then on Tues­day, after the cheese con­tro­versy had been picked up by na­tion­al me­dia (and me), the FDA re­leased a brief state­ment say­ing it has not im­posed a new policy ban­ning wooden shelves. It did, however, plan to work with cheese makers “to de­term­ine wheth­er cer­tain types of cheeses can safely be made by aging them on wooden shelving.”

Ar­tis­an cheese pro­du­cers were still un­nerved. So on Wed­nes­day, the FDA re­leased a second, longer state­ment ad­dress­ing the con­fu­sion:

Re­cently, you may have heard some con­cerns sug­gest­ing the FDA has taken steps to end the long-stand­ing prac­tice in the cheese­mak­ing in­dustry of us­ing wooden boards to age cheese. To be clear, we have not and are not pro­hib­it­ing or ban­ning the long-stand­ing prac­tice of us­ing wood shelving in ar­tis­an­al cheese.

At the start of the year, the FDA’s Cen­ter for Food Safety and Ap­plied Nu­tri­tion cited sev­er­al New York state cheese makers for their use of wooden boards. The state’s ag­ri­cul­ture asked the FDA for an­swers, and the agency replied that “wooden shelves or boards can­not be ad­equately cleaned and san­it­ized” and “could be a po­ten­tial source of patho­gen­ic mi­croor­gan­isms.”

FDA of­fi­cials said they un­der­stand how U.S. cheese makers may have mis­un­der­stood that re­sponse. “We re­cog­nize that the lan­guage used in this com­mu­nic­a­tion may have ap­peared more defin­it­ive than it should have, in light of the agency’s ac­tu­al prac­tices on this is­sue,” the agency said Wed­nes­day.

Patho­gen­ic mi­croor­gan­isms such as Lis­teria mono­cyt­o­genes, a dan­ger­ous in­fec­tion-caus­ing bac­teri­um that at­tacks the cent­ral nervous sys­tem, are a real threat to ar­tis­an­al cheeses. Wooden sur­faces are tough­er to clean than plastic or stain­less steel — and thus have a great­er risk of car­ry­ing dan­ger­ous bac­teria. The FDA says it has found the Lis­teria patho­gen in more than 20 per­cent of in­spec­tions of ar­tis­an­al cheese­makers since 2010.

The agency has no proof that those con­tam­in­a­tions were linked to wooden boards. But it has his­tor­ic­ally been wor­ried about their use, and plans to work with the ar­tis­an­al cheese in­dustry on best prac­tices.

So there you go, cheese makers, it’s all settled. Amer­ica, your Par­mi­gi­ano-Reg­gia­no is safe — for now.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×