Obama’s Thankfully ‘Dictatorial’ Approach to Climate Change

How the president helped solve one of political theory’s biggest problems.

President Obama makes his way to board Marine One last month on the South Lawn of the White House.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
June 6, 2014, 1 a.m.

In col­lege classes, cli­mate change is taught as a text­book ex­ample of where demo­cracy fails. And there are a whole host of reas­ons to think Amer­ica will fail on cli­mate change: We’ve waited too long; the con­sequences aren’t as tan­gible as in oth­er areas of policy; we’re bad at sac­ri­fi­cing in the short term to achieve in the long term.

Pres­id­ent Obama, who on Monday rolled out land­mark reg­u­la­tions for coal-fired power plants, has found a way around that age-old polit­ic­al prob­lem posed by cli­mate change and demo­cra­cies, in part by act­ing a little bit more like a dic­tat­or. This is something he’s been skewered for on the right, with Rush Limbaugh ac­cus­ing the White House of fo­cus­ing on glob­al warm­ing just be­cause “it of­fers the pres­id­ent op­por­tun­it­ies to be dic­tat­ori­al.”

Limbaugh is onto something, but he has it pre­cisely back­ward: The de­cision to use ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity is the means, not the ends. It also makes a lot of sense when it comes to glob­al warm­ing giv­en Con­gress’s fail­ure to pass the Wax­man-Mar­key en­ergy bill in 2009, and, for dec­ades be­fore that, to pass any sort of com­pre­hens­ive cli­mate le­gis­la­tion what­so­ever.

If cli­mate change seems like a dif­fi­cult prob­lem to nav­ig­ate na­tion­ally, in­ter­na­tion­ally things get even more com­plic­ated. Es­teemed Brit­ish eco­nom­ist and aca­dem­ic Nich­olas Stern elab­or­ated on the di­lemma in the Stern Re­view, a 700-page re­port re­leased for the Brit­ish gov­ern­ment in 2006. No two coun­tries face ex­actly the same situ­ation in terms of im­pacts or the costs and be­ne­fits of ac­tion, he ob­served, and no coun­try can ef­fect­ively act alone. “In­ter­na­tion­al col­lect­ive ac­tion to tackle the prob­lem is re­quired be­cause cli­mate … is a glob­al pub­lic good,” he wrote, “and be­cause co­oper­at­ive ac­tion will greatly re­duce the costs of both mit­ig­a­tion and ad­ap­tion. The in­ter­na­tion­al col­lect­ive re­sponse to the cli­mate-change prob­lem re­quired is there­fore unique, both in terms of its com­plex­ity and depth.”

Daniel Esty, the Hill­house pro­fess­or of en­vir­on­ment­al law and policy at Yale, called the dic­tat­or ac­cus­a­tion “ut­terly ri­dicu­lous,” not­ing the pres­id­ent’s ac­tions are au­thor­ized un­der the Clean Air Act, as well as sanc­tioned by the Su­preme Court.

“The ap­proach that the pres­id­ent and EPA have put for­ward is thought­ful, mod­est, and rep­res­ents a com­mon­sense ap­proach to a chal­len­ging prob­lem,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al. The new reg­u­la­tions provide ample room for state-level in­nov­a­tion and tail­or­ing of ac­tion plans to loc­al cir­cum­stances, he ad­ded, but it’s by no means the best ap­proach to ad­dress­ing cli­mate change.

The best op­tion was already taken off the table and for reas­ons that have little to do with the ex­ec­ut­ive branch. “Giv­en that Con­gress has sys­tem­at­ic­ally failed to ad­dress cli­mate change for 20 years, the pres­id­ent and EPA need to take ac­tion with­in the scope of au­thor­ity they have,” ex­plained Esty, who worked for years as com­mis­sion­er of Con­necti­c­ut’s De­part­ment of En­ergy and En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion. “The pack­age they have put for­ward rep­res­ents a good first step.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5007) }}

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
23 hours ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
19 hours ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
14 hours ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.