Senators Start Over on Unemployment-Insurance Extension

Because so much time has passed, Congress is unlikely to grant retroactive benefits. Continued House opposition isn’t helping either.

A job seeker fills out an application during a career fair at the Southeast Community Facility Commission on May 21, 2014 in San Francisco, California.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
June 4, 2014, 1 a.m.

Sen­ate ne­go­ti­at­ors are back at the draw­ing board in try­ing to re­new emer­gency un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits for more than 2 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans who have been out of work for at least six months.

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Is­land and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada have re­sumed ne­go­ti­ations to cre­ate new le­gis­la­tion that would ex­tend the be­ne­fits.

The Sen­ate passed a bill in April that would have ex­ten­ded the be­ne­fits through May and provided ret­ro­act­ive checks to those who had stopped re­ceiv­ing pay­ments since the pro­gram ex­pired on Dec. 28. But that le­gis­la­tion ex­pired on May 31 with no ac­tion in the House, put­ting the onus on sen­at­ors who fa­vor the pro­gram to try again.

Reed and Heller have been work­ing to­geth­er on a new solu­tion for at least two weeks and hope to ex­tend the pro­gram through at least the end of this year. While the na­tion­al un­em­ploy­ment rate is drop­ping, Reed said, the long-term un­em­ploy­ment rate is not. “We’re find­ing a lot of people who are mid-ca­reer, have worked for 20 or 30 years, and are just find­ing it very, very hard to get back in. And these be­ne­fits are vi­tal for them,” he said.

But the two sen­at­ors face a num­ber of con­straints that are ham­per­ing their ne­go­ti­ations. Be­cause the be­ne­fits dis­ap­peared more than five months ago and they’ll have to find some way to pay for every penny of the new bill, they warn that grant­ing ret­ro­act­ive be­ne­fits to mil­lions may not be pos­sible this time around.

“That’s hard to do at this point. It will prob­ably be pro­spect­ive,” Heller said. “I’m guess­ing that we just go for­ward at this point. Five months of [ret­ro­act­ive] UI at this point, is a big, big bite of the apple. So that’s not guar­an­teed, but I’m telling you that we real­ize that we are in a bind right now try­ing to make it ret­ro­act­ive.”

An­oth­er con­cern is con­tin­ued op­pos­i­tion from House Speak­er John Boehner, who has said over and over since mid-Decem­ber that the cham­ber will not take up an un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance bill un­less it in­cludes a sep­ar­ate pro­vi­sion that ad­dresses job cre­ation.

Reed said they are not dis­cuss­ing that as an op­tion in the Sen­ate, and he called Boehner hy­po­crit­ic­al after the House passed a tax-ex­tenders bill last month that wasn’t paid for at all. “[I] found it iron­ic that the House could pass an un­fun­ded tax-ex­tenders bill, and yet de­mand that our bill — you know, wasn’t suf­fi­cient even though it was paid for and bi­par­tis­an,” Reed said.

But Heller said that he agreed with Boehner and that the bill should in­clude a jobs pro­vi­sion. The only prob­lem is, it’s not polit­ic­ally pos­sible for him to in­clude one in the Sen­ate pack­age. “If I could, I would,” Heller said.

In­stead, Heller is ur­ging Boehner and oth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans to take up the new Sen­ate bill (as­sum­ing it gets through the up­per cham­ber first) and add their own jobs pro­vi­sion on the back end. Then the two cham­bers can go to con­fer­ence and work out their dif­fer­ences, he said.

For the time be­ing, Heller and Reed ap­pear to be work­ing on their own. Just over a week ago, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who was one of the six Re­pub­lic­ans to help push the ori­gin­al un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance ex­ten­sion pack­age through the Sen­ate in April, told Na­tion­al Journ­al that she was not in­volved in the new dis­cus­sions.

Murkowski ex­pressed con­cerns that the Sen­ate was in a po­s­i­tion of “start­ing over” on the le­gis­la­tion and that too much time may have passed to come up with a solu­tion. “Without hav­ing a dir­ect con­ver­sa­tion with the two guys who are try­ing to breathe life in­to it, I can’t say that it’s com­pletely dead. “¦ It’s not look­ing good right now — I guess that’s the best way to sum it up,” she said.

Neither Reed nor Heller could spec­u­late on a time frame for when they might in­tro­duce a new Sen­ate pack­age.

“We’re work­ing on it,” Reed said. “It’s not something we’re ig­nor­ing. “¦ We have to look for a le­gis­lat­ive path. We have to find the right sort of for­mula, lit­er­ally and fig­ur­at­ively. And then we have to make sure that we have the ne­ces­sary bi­par­tis­an sup­port here.”

What We're Following See More »
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×