Dianne Feinstein Disappointed Lawmakers Not Given 30-Day Notice on Bergdahl Swap

The Senate Intel Committee chairwoman says the administration has apologized for not giving her a heads up.

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks in January on Capitol Hill. On Wednesday, the senior lawmaker criticized the Energy Department's plan to extend the schedule for completing work on multiple nuclear-security projects.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
June 3, 2014, 9:26 a.m.

Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein took at shot at the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion on Tues­day for fail­ing to give law­makers 30 days’ no­tice about a deal to re­lease five Taliban pris­on­ers from Guantanamo Bay in ex­change for Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl, the only POW from Amer­ica’s war in Afgh­anistan.

“It’s very dis­ap­point­ing that there was not a level of trust suf­fi­cient to jus­ti­fy alert­ing us,” Fein­stein told re­port­ers in the Cap­it­ol.

A de­fense bill that Pres­id­ent Obama signed in­to law in Decem­ber 2013 re­quires that Con­gress be no­ti­fied 30 days ahead of re­leas­ing pris­on­ers from Guantanamo Bay.

Fein­stein said that Na­tion­al Deputy Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Tony Blinken called her Monday night “apo­lo­giz­ing” for fail­ing to no­ti­fy law­makers soon­er.

“He apo­lo­gized for it and said it was an over­sight,” Fein­stein said. When asked wheth­er he used the word “over­sight,” Fein­stein cla­ri­fied: “In so many words, I can’t say. That was my im­pres­sion.”

While the Cali­for­nia Demo­crat says “the pres­id­ent cer­tainly has an ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity that he can use,” she also wants to know wheth­er Ber­g­dahl was a desert­er, and she wants to know the terms of the deal with the Qatari gov­ern­ment, which has pledged to keep the Taliban pris­on­ers for a year. There will be a brief­ing Tues­day for In­tel Com­mit­tee mem­bers, and a closed Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee hear­ing next Tues­day about the swap.

In Decem­ber, Obama is­sued a sign­ing state­ment that said the ex­ec­ut­ive branch should have the flex­ib­il­ity “to act swiftly in con­duct­ing ne­go­ti­ations with for­eign coun­tries re­gard­ing the cir­cum­stances of de­tain­ee trans­fers.”

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has de­fen­ded the pris­on­er swap, point­ing to the sign­ing state­ment as a clear in­dic­a­tion that Con­gress was put on no­tice, and that law­makers knew for a long time about the pos­sib­il­ity of such a swap.

“We have con­sul­ted with Con­gress for quite some time about the pos­sib­il­ity that we might need to ex­ecute a pris­on­er ex­change in or­der to re­cov­er Ser­geant Ber­g­dahl,” Obama said in Po­land on Tues­day morn­ing. “We saw an op­por­tun­ity. We were con­cerned about Ser­geant Ber­g­dahl’s health. We had the co­oper­a­tion of the Qatar­is to ex­ecute an ex­change, and we seized that op­por­tun­ity. And the pro­cess was trun­cated be­cause we wanted to make sure that we did not miss that win­dow.”

House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Buck McK­eon has already pledged to hold hear­ings on the pris­on­er swap, say­ing his “im­pres­sion” is that the pres­id­ent broke the law when he failed to give no­tice.

Fein­stein con­ceded that op­pos­i­tion to the deal could have been one reas­on law­makers wer­en’t no­ti­fied. “But the White House is pretty uni­lat­er­al about what they want to do when they want to do it,” she ad­ded.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4995) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×