President Obama has directed Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to delay announcing any changes to deportation enforcement until after the summer, in an effort to give the House one last shot to move reform this year.
That news, first reported by the Associated Press, came after a cohort of influential pro-reform groups said they “strongly urge” the Obama administration to hold off on executive action. “We believe the President should move cautiously and give the House leadership all of the space they may need to bring legislation to the floor for a vote,” said the Tuesday statement from groups including the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, the National Immigration Forum, SEIU, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.
But some younger immigration activists, who have been vocal in taking Obama to task on deportations, are strongly opposed to such a delay. United We Dream policy and advocacy director Lorella Praeli said the coalition is “outraged” at the delay, and that Obama “continues cowering before House Republicans who show no real commitment to move immigration reform forward.”
“His decision demonstrates his complacency and willingness to deport more than 1,100 people every day and separate countless families, cementing his legacy as the deporter-in-chief,” Praeli said in a statement.
The strategy behind the delay creates a space for Republicans to act on reform, without being able to point to Obama taking executive action as killing reform as an out. “The House Republicans are now out of excuses not to pass immigration reform and the ball is in their court,” said Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, who helped craft the Senate’s bipartisan immigration bill. “Supporters of reform have bent over backwards to give the House space to act, and now it’s time for them to do so.”
It’s not all that surprising that Obama would delay such an announcement. The president has previously signaled that there’s a window for the House to move on reform. And last week, Senate Democratic leaders set a hard deadline of July 31, the last day of congressional work before August recess, for the House to pass comprehensive reform. After that deadline passes, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid urged executive action. “We waited 329 days; we’re willing to wait another six weeks,” Reid said.
But waiting six more weeks is something that some advocates say has real-life consequences, and that’s time they can’t afford.
Obama had directed Johnson back in March to start the review, after pressure from advocates reached a fever-pitch. With lack of congressional action, many became frustrated that the president wasn’t doing more to alleviate deportations.
The president had been walking a fine line. If he took strong action, he would be signaling that chances for reform are dead in Congress (or, for Republicans, that he wants to “kill” reform). By pulling back to allow more time, the administration is tempering such a criticism and rallying advocates around a sole target: House Republicans.
Both sides of the debate can’t even come to an agreement on the numbers behind Obama’s deportation record. Pro-reform activists have maligned Obama as the “deporter-in-chief,” with an oft-mentioned 2 million deported figure that mainly includes removals. But Republicans charge that the administration is inflating its deportation figures by counting deportations that weren’t counted as such under previous administrations, with removals from the interior having gone down, while those within 100 miles of the border have gone up.
Despite Democrats giving them a handful of weeks to act, House Republican leaders show no indications that they are going to take up immigration reform this summer (they also haven’t ruled it out). Majority Leader Eric Cantor has publicly supported citizenship for some undocumented young people and allowing them to enlist in the military to gain legal status, but his primary campaign has been advertising his role in stopping the Senate bill to “give illegal aliens amnesty.”
House Speaker John Boehner has continued to insist that a lack of trust in the Obama administration to enforce new immigration laws is what’s preventing the House from moving on reform now.
On Thursday, the House Judiciary Committee will hold its first oversight hearing with Johnson in attendance, where executive action will be the focus. “The committee expects Secretary Johnson to answer our questions tomorrow and explain why the administration continues to recklessly disregard our immigration laws,” Chairman Bob Goodlatte said in a statement.
Not exactly the sentiments of GOP leaders who are anxious to vote on reform proposals this summer, are they?
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."