Eric Cantor Wants You to Know He Stopped Plan ‘to Give Illegal Aliens Amnesty’

The majority leader’s congressional campaign is highlighting his role in blocking immigration reform.

Caption:US Congressman Eric Cantor, R-VA, walks to a meeting at Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on October 16, 2013. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday that a deal had been reached with Republican leaders to end a fiscal impasse that has threatened the United States with default.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
May 28, 2014, 1:15 a.m.

Im­mig­ra­tion act­iv­ists and Eric Can­tor agree on something: He’s re­spons­ible for block­ing com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form in the House.

The ma­jor­ity lead­er, who faces tea-party act­iv­ist and Ran­dolph-Ma­con Col­lege pro­fess­or Dav­id Brat in a June 10 Vir­gin­ia primary, has been beat­ing back claims by his op­pon­ent that say he’s soft on is­sues ran­ging from Obama­care to im­mig­ra­tion. Last week, Can­tor’s cam­paign sent out a mail­er, which de­clares Can­tor is “stop­ping the Obama-Re­id plan to give il­leg­al ali­ens am­nesty.”

It’s the sort of harsh rhet­or­ic that ap­pears to be at odds, at least in tone, with Can­tor’s re­cent state­ments on im­mig­ra­tion. Just as Can­tor’s cam­paign was send­ing tens of thou­sands of these mail­ers in his Vir­gin­ia dis­trict, he was cla­ri­fy­ing to mul­tiple out­lets that he sup­ports the policy of a bill that would grant leg­al status to un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants who en­list in the mil­it­ary.

House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship pre­ven­ted that bill, called the En­list Act, from reach­ing the House floor as part of the de­bate on a must-pass de­fense bill. The Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act “is not the ap­pro­pri­ate place for this, but I sup­port the prin­ciple,” Can­tor said.

Can­tor’s cam­paign in­sists that there is no in­con­sist­ency with his po­s­i­tion on im­mig­ra­tion re­form and the mail­er that de­cries grant­ing “six mil­lion il­leg­al ali­ens cit­izen­ship.” The mail­er util­izes lan­guage that na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans have been try­ing to shy away from, namely re­fer­ring to un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants as “il­leg­al ali­ens.” (It also calls the Sen­ate bill, which passed with the help of 14 Re­pub­lic­ans, the “Re­id-Obama” plan.)

“In the real world, we all know that the sys­tem is broken and what Eric has said is he is not for these blanket am­nesty plans,” said Can­tor cam­paign spokes­man Ray Al­len. “He has also said we should be able to reach a con­sensus on some of these oth­er is­sues: bor­der se­cur­ity, e-Veri­fy, and what we do about chil­dren. That’s called lead­er­ship.”

But sup­port­ing the prin­ciple of the En­list Act while also block­ing it isn’t enough for im­mig­ra­tion ad­voc­ates, who have been tar­get­ing Can­tor as a main obstacle to com­pre­hens­ive re­form.

Over Me­mori­al Day week­end, im­mig­ra­tion act­iv­ists stormed his D.C.-area condo, where they chanted about “the one man block­ing im­mig­ra­tion re­form.” And on Wed­nes­day, Demo­crat­ic Rep. Lu­is Gu­ti­er­rez, a pro-re­form lead­er in the House, spoke at the Vir­gin­ia Cap­it­ol in Rich­mond about Can­tor’s role in block­ing re­form.

Do such at­tacks from the left help high­light the po­s­i­tion Can­tor’s cam­paign is try­ing to make? Al­len wouldn’t com­ment on that, but he did say, “At least they have a le­git­im­ate beef be­cause Eric has stopped com­pre­hens­ive re­form, and he is stand­ing against the im­mig­ra­tion [bill], so the cri­ti­cism from the left makes a cer­tain amount of sense.”

House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship has in­sisted the House will take a “step-by-step” ap­proach to re­form, but haven’t com­mit­ted to a timetable. They also em­phas­ize that the main obstacle to re­form is the lack of trust Re­pub­lic­ans have in the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to en­force new im­mig­ra­tion laws.

Can­tor isn’t con­sidered vul­ner­able in the race, though Brat’s chal­lenge has picked up some na­tion­al at­ten­tion. Can­tor has more than $2 mil­lion cash on hand, while Brat has only $42,418.

Still, Brat’s at­tacks on Can­tor’s im­mig­ra­tion re­cord were enough to spur his cam­paign to cla­ri­fy the re­cord, as they put it. Mean­while, it’s that same re­cord that has re­form ad­voc­ates so up­set.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×