The Plan to Let Americans Refinance Their Student-Loan Debt — and What Democrats Hope to Gain From It

The proposal from Elizabeth Warren doesn’t have a bright legislative future. But it could play well with a key group of voters.

William A. Murphy II, of Raleigh, N.C., a member of the Morehouse College 2002 graduating class, wears a customized cap during commencement ceremonies May 19, 2002 in Atlanta.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
May 16, 2014, 1 a.m.

Sen­ate Demo­crats want to let people re­fin­ance their stu­dent-loan debt through the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, and they’re count­ing on voters pay­ing at­ten­tion to their ef­forts come Novem­ber.

A pro­pos­al from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts would let Amer­ic­ans re­fin­ance fed­er­al and private stu­dent-loan debt at the same rates stu­dents can get for new loans.

Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship has pledged to bring the bill to the floor for a vote in the first or second week of June as the latest plank in the “Fair Shot Agenda,” their 2014-elec­tion year le­gis­lat­ive plan that has already in­cluded min­im­um-wage and equal-pay le­gis­la­tion.

Of course, most Demo­crats ac­tu­ally like the policy pro­pos­als they’re push­ing. But they also think they make for ex­cel­lent polit­ics and ap­peal to a broad swath of Amer­ic­ans, in­clud­ing the Demo­crat­ic base they so des­per­ately need to turn out in Novem­ber.

“We think this is an is­sue that is timely, and it’s one that across Amer­ica draws a re­ac­tion you don’t of­ten see,” said Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip Dick Durbin said of the stu­dent-loan pro­pos­al. “Most of us have been around a lot of cam­paigns and a lot of is­sues over a long peri­od of time. I can­not think of a single is­sue that draws such a spon­tan­eous emo­tion­al re­sponse from every audi­ence you speak to.”

Stu­dent-loan debt is a crush­ing weight on many Amer­ic­ans. It has already sur­passed cred­it-card debt, and adds up to more than $1 tril­lion. And, ac­cord­ing to a new Pew Re­search Cen­ter sur­vey, it weighs heav­iest on young­er gen­er­a­tions: 37 per­cent of house­holds headed by someone young­er than 40 has stu­dent-loan debt, which is a re­cord high.

Ad­dress­ing stu­dent loans polls well with young people. One-third of 18-to-30-year-olds “worry a lot” about high stu­dent-loan debt, and 87 per­cent fa­vor lower in­terest rates, ac­cord­ing to a new poll con­duc­ted by Harstad Stra­tegic Re­search. But that doesn’t make this an im­me­di­ate win­ning strategy, polit­ic­ally: Only 28 per­cent of those same mil­len­ni­als said they will “def­in­itely vote” in the 2014 elec­tion.

Last year, Con­gress faced a doub­ling of in­terest rates on cer­tain new stu­dent loans. But rather than ex­tend the lower rates be­fore they doubled, they re­struc­tured the way in­terest rates on new loans are cal­cu­lated by ty­ing them to a mar­ket in­stru­ment. Stu­dents tak­ing out new Stafford stu­dent loans, for in­stance, pay 3.86 per­cent on un­der­gradu­ate and 5.41 on gradu­ate loans. Those rates are locked in for the life of the loan, but de­pend­ing on mar­ket fluc­tu­ations, the rate can change for new loans from year to year.

Un­like last year, Con­gress doesn’t ac­tu­ally face a dead­line to get something done re­gard­ing stu­dent-loan debt — so the im­petus to act quickly just isn’t there.

And just like with min­im­um wage and the Paycheck Fair­ness Act that Demo­crats have pushed in re­cent months, this stu­dent-loan pro­pos­al is a long shot to ac­tu­ally passing the Sen­ate, let alone reach­ing the pres­id­ent’s desk. It’ll need five Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans to back it, along with the en­tire Demo­crat­ic caucus.

It’s be­ing paid for us­ing the so-called “Buf­fett Rule” tax on mil­lion­aires that en­sures they are taxed at at least 30 per­cent (it does so by chan­ging the max­im­um tax rate of 15 per­cent on long-term cap­it­al gains). The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice hasn’t yet provided a score on how much the stu­dent-loan pro­pos­al costs, but Demo­crats say en­act­ing the Buf­fett Rule would cov­er it fully.

Even be­fore War­ren’s pro­pos­al was in­tro­duced, the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Re­pub­lic­an shot it down. “This looks like a dus­ted-off pro­pos­al to raise taxes, and that’s not something I think we need to do,” Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said last week. “Our eco­nomy grew at 0.1 per­cent last quarter.”

Demo­crat­ic lead­ers say they are open to Re­pub­lic­an al­tern­at­ives to pay for the plan, but that’s not really where the com­plete ob­jec­tion lies. Re­pub­lic­ans are weary of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment get­ting in­to the busi­ness of re­fin­an­cing such loans at all, in­clud­ing private loans.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der, the rank­ing mem­ber of the Sen­ate Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee, said in a state­ment that War­ren’s pro­pos­al “is start­ing down the road of turn­ing a tril­lion dol­lars of stu­dent loans in­to grants and count­ing spend­ing in a way that the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice has told Con­gress not to do.”

It’s also un­clear wheth­er Re­pub­lic­ans will of­fer a spe­cif­ic al­tern­at­ive on re­fin­an­cing stu­dent-loan debt; Al­ex­an­der poin­ted to Re­pub­lic­an pro­pos­als deal­ing with school choice, early-child­hood learn­ing, and chan­ging the way col­lege stu­dents can use Pell Grants.

Some of the law­makers who had been in­stru­ment­al in the stu­dent loan deal that was cut last sum­mer said they either haven’t been ap­proached yet about this pro­pos­al or are still think­ing it over. And War­ren and oth­er lib­er­al Demo­crats ac­tu­ally op­posed that deal, say­ing the rates were too high and shouldn’t be tied to the mar­ket.

An Al­ex­an­der spokes­man says there hasn’t been out­reach to the sen­at­or about the new bill. “There’ve been no hear­ings on the bill by the com­mit­tee, there have been no markups, and the com­mit­tee is in the middle of a bi­par­tis­an ef­fort to reau­thor­ize the High­er Edu­ca­tion Act,” Jim Jef­fries said. “It’s hard to see how this could be any­thing more than a mes­saging bill.”

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Chuck Schu­mer of New York, a mem­ber of lead­er­ship, pushed back on the idea that a hear­ing is needed on this pro­pos­al: “We’ve been dis­cuss­ing stu­dent loans here for years. It’s a very simple concept; you don’t need a lot of hear­ings: Should the gov­ern­ment be char­ging people 7 per­cent, when they can charge them 3 or 4 per­cent? Should banks be char­ging them 14 per­cent, when the go­ing rate of in­terest is 3 or 4 per­cent?”

Schu­mer ad­ded, “The bot­tom line is, it’s not a mes­saging bill if they’ll sup­port it.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
3 days ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.