The Plan to Let Americans Refinance Their Student-Loan Debt — and What Democrats Hope to Gain From It

The proposal from Elizabeth Warren doesn’t have a bright legislative future. But it could play well with a key group of voters.

William A. Murphy II, of Raleigh, N.C., a member of the Morehouse College 2002 graduating class, wears a customized cap during commencement ceremonies May 19, 2002 in Atlanta.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
May 16, 2014, 1 a.m.

Sen­ate Demo­crats want to let people re­fin­ance their stu­dent-loan debt through the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, and they’re count­ing on voters pay­ing at­ten­tion to their ef­forts come Novem­ber.

A pro­pos­al from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts would let Amer­ic­ans re­fin­ance fed­er­al and private stu­dent-loan debt at the same rates stu­dents can get for new loans.

Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship has pledged to bring the bill to the floor for a vote in the first or second week of June as the latest plank in the “Fair Shot Agenda,” their 2014-elec­tion year le­gis­lat­ive plan that has already in­cluded min­im­um-wage and equal-pay le­gis­la­tion.

Of course, most Demo­crats ac­tu­ally like the policy pro­pos­als they’re push­ing. But they also think they make for ex­cel­lent polit­ics and ap­peal to a broad swath of Amer­ic­ans, in­clud­ing the Demo­crat­ic base they so des­per­ately need to turn out in Novem­ber.

“We think this is an is­sue that is timely, and it’s one that across Amer­ica draws a re­ac­tion you don’t of­ten see,” said Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip Dick Durbin said of the stu­dent-loan pro­pos­al. “Most of us have been around a lot of cam­paigns and a lot of is­sues over a long peri­od of time. I can­not think of a single is­sue that draws such a spon­tan­eous emo­tion­al re­sponse from every audi­ence you speak to.”

Stu­dent-loan debt is a crush­ing weight on many Amer­ic­ans. It has already sur­passed cred­it-card debt, and adds up to more than $1 tril­lion. And, ac­cord­ing to a new Pew Re­search Cen­ter sur­vey, it weighs heav­iest on young­er gen­er­a­tions: 37 per­cent of house­holds headed by someone young­er than 40 has stu­dent-loan debt, which is a re­cord high.

Ad­dress­ing stu­dent loans polls well with young people. One-third of 18-to-30-year-olds “worry a lot” about high stu­dent-loan debt, and 87 per­cent fa­vor lower in­terest rates, ac­cord­ing to a new poll con­duc­ted by Harstad Stra­tegic Re­search. But that doesn’t make this an im­me­di­ate win­ning strategy, polit­ic­ally: Only 28 per­cent of those same mil­len­ni­als said they will “def­in­itely vote” in the 2014 elec­tion.

Last year, Con­gress faced a doub­ling of in­terest rates on cer­tain new stu­dent loans. But rather than ex­tend the lower rates be­fore they doubled, they re­struc­tured the way in­terest rates on new loans are cal­cu­lated by ty­ing them to a mar­ket in­stru­ment. Stu­dents tak­ing out new Stafford stu­dent loans, for in­stance, pay 3.86 per­cent on un­der­gradu­ate and 5.41 on gradu­ate loans. Those rates are locked in for the life of the loan, but de­pend­ing on mar­ket fluc­tu­ations, the rate can change for new loans from year to year.

Un­like last year, Con­gress doesn’t ac­tu­ally face a dead­line to get something done re­gard­ing stu­dent-loan debt — so the im­petus to act quickly just isn’t there.

And just like with min­im­um wage and the Paycheck Fair­ness Act that Demo­crats have pushed in re­cent months, this stu­dent-loan pro­pos­al is a long shot to ac­tu­ally passing the Sen­ate, let alone reach­ing the pres­id­ent’s desk. It’ll need five Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans to back it, along with the en­tire Demo­crat­ic caucus.

It’s be­ing paid for us­ing the so-called “Buf­fett Rule” tax on mil­lion­aires that en­sures they are taxed at at least 30 per­cent (it does so by chan­ging the max­im­um tax rate of 15 per­cent on long-term cap­it­al gains). The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice hasn’t yet provided a score on how much the stu­dent-loan pro­pos­al costs, but Demo­crats say en­act­ing the Buf­fett Rule would cov­er it fully.

Even be­fore War­ren’s pro­pos­al was in­tro­duced, the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Re­pub­lic­an shot it down. “This looks like a dus­ted-off pro­pos­al to raise taxes, and that’s not something I think we need to do,” Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said last week. “Our eco­nomy grew at 0.1 per­cent last quarter.”

Demo­crat­ic lead­ers say they are open to Re­pub­lic­an al­tern­at­ives to pay for the plan, but that’s not really where the com­plete ob­jec­tion lies. Re­pub­lic­ans are weary of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment get­ting in­to the busi­ness of re­fin­an­cing such loans at all, in­clud­ing private loans.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der, the rank­ing mem­ber of the Sen­ate Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee, said in a state­ment that War­ren’s pro­pos­al “is start­ing down the road of turn­ing a tril­lion dol­lars of stu­dent loans in­to grants and count­ing spend­ing in a way that the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice has told Con­gress not to do.”

It’s also un­clear wheth­er Re­pub­lic­ans will of­fer a spe­cif­ic al­tern­at­ive on re­fin­an­cing stu­dent-loan debt; Al­ex­an­der poin­ted to Re­pub­lic­an pro­pos­als deal­ing with school choice, early-child­hood learn­ing, and chan­ging the way col­lege stu­dents can use Pell Grants.

Some of the law­makers who had been in­stru­ment­al in the stu­dent loan deal that was cut last sum­mer said they either haven’t been ap­proached yet about this pro­pos­al or are still think­ing it over. And War­ren and oth­er lib­er­al Demo­crats ac­tu­ally op­posed that deal, say­ing the rates were too high and shouldn’t be tied to the mar­ket.

An Al­ex­an­der spokes­man says there hasn’t been out­reach to the sen­at­or about the new bill. “There’ve been no hear­ings on the bill by the com­mit­tee, there have been no markups, and the com­mit­tee is in the middle of a bi­par­tis­an ef­fort to reau­thor­ize the High­er Edu­ca­tion Act,” Jim Jef­fries said. “It’s hard to see how this could be any­thing more than a mes­saging bill.”

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Chuck Schu­mer of New York, a mem­ber of lead­er­ship, pushed back on the idea that a hear­ing is needed on this pro­pos­al: “We’ve been dis­cuss­ing stu­dent loans here for years. It’s a very simple concept; you don’t need a lot of hear­ings: Should the gov­ern­ment be char­ging people 7 per­cent, when they can charge them 3 or 4 per­cent? Should banks be char­ging them 14 per­cent, when the go­ing rate of in­terest is 3 or 4 per­cent?”

Schu­mer ad­ded, “The bot­tom line is, it’s not a mes­saging bill if they’ll sup­port it.”

What We're Following See More »
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
21 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
23 minutes ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
×