Average Americans Think They’re Smarter Than the Average American

What does that mean for the country as a whole?

National Journal
Marina Koren
See more stories about...
Marina Koren
May 12, 2014, 10:13 a.m.

For­get be­ing smarter than a fifth-grader. Most Amer­ic­ans think they’re smarter than every­one else in the coun­try.

Fifty-five per­cent of Amer­ic­ans think that they are smarter than the av­er­age Amer­ic­an, ac­cord­ing to a new sur­vey by YouGov, a re­search or­gan­iz­a­tion that uses on­line polling. In oth­er words, as YouGov clev­erly points out, the av­er­age Amer­ic­an thinks that he or she is smarter than the av­er­age Amer­ic­an.

A humble 34 per­cent of cit­izens say they are about as smart as every­one else, while a dis­pir­ited 4 per­cent say they are less in­tel­li­gent than most people.

Men (24 per­cent) are more likely than wo­men (15 per­cent) to say they are “much more in­tel­li­gent” than the av­er­age Amer­ic­an. White people are more likely to say the same than His­pan­ic and black people.

So, this many smart people must mean that, on the whole, the United States ranks pretty high in in­tel­li­gence, right?

Not quite. Ac­cord­ing to the sur­vey, just 44 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans say that Amer­ic­ans are “av­er­agely in­tel­li­gent.” People who make less than $40,000 a year are much more likely to say that their fel­low Amer­ic­ans are in­tel­li­gent, while those who make more than $100,000 are far more likely to say that Amer­ic­ans are un­in­tel­li­gent.

The res­ults are not sur­pris­ing. West­ern cul­tures have a habit of in­flat­ing their self-worth, past re­search has shown. The most com­pet­ent in­di­vidu­als also tend to un­der­es­tim­ate their abil­ity, while in­com­pet­ent people over­es­tim­ate it. Not out of ar­rog­ance, but of ig­nor­ance — the worst per­formers of­ten don’t get neg­at­ive feed­back. In this sur­vey, 28 per­cent of high school gradu­ates say they are “slightly more in­tel­li­gent” than av­er­age, while just 1 per­cent of people with doc­tor­al de­grees say they are “much less in­tel­li­gent.”

Of course, a Ph.D. doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily meas­ure in­tel­li­gence, nor does how much money you make. Those factors, along with gender and race, may be bet­ter in­dic­at­ors of humbl­eb­rag abil­ity than brain­power.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4946) }}

What We're Following See More »
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
6 hours ago

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
7 hours ago

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
7 hours ago

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

RNC Chief Would Welcome Bloomberg
7 hours ago

“The lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic na­tion­al com­mit­tees on Wed­nes­day weighed in on the pro­spect of an in­de­pend­ent pres­id­en­tial run by” former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz sug­ges­ted that the former New York City may­or’s pri­or­it­ies are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Demo­crat­ic plat­form, while RNC lead­er Re­ince Priebus wel­comed the idea, say­ing Bloomberg would si­phon off votes from the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate.”

How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
8 hours ago

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.