U.S. News Says It Won’t Include Sexual-Assault Stats in Its College Rankings

Despite push from Congress, <em>U.S. News</em> says it’s rankings are focused on academics.

 A general view during the college commencement ceremony for Westminister College on June 1, 2013 in Salt Lake City, Utah.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
May 9, 2014, 1 a.m.

U.S. News & World Re­port will not in­clude cam­pus sexu­al-as­sault data in its an­nu­al col­lege rank­ings this year, des­pite pleas from mem­bers of Con­gress.

The pub­lic­a­tion, which serves as a one-stop shop for many high school seni­ors and their par­ents seek­ing in­form­a­tion on pro­spect­ive col­leges, an­nounced in a blog post that it will fea­ture the Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment’s sexu­al-as­sault data on the in­di­vidu­al pages for schools. The blog post also in­cluded the Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment’s re­cently re­leased list of the 55 col­leges and uni­versit­ies that are cur­rently un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion for their hand­ling of sexu­al-as­sault cases.

But U.S. News also said that it will not in­clude that data in its meth­od­o­logy for rank­ing col­leges, ar­guing that the in­form­a­tion provided by the Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment is “not us­able to meas­ure re­l­at­ive cam­pus safety among col­leges,” U.S. News spokes­wo­man Lucy Ly­ons said.

U.S. News Ed­it­or and Chief Con­tent Of­ficer Bri­an Kelly elab­or­ated: “Any crime data any­where is tough to col­lect, as you know. And cam­pus crime data has been for many years par­tic­u­larly no­tori­ous for be­ing un­re­li­able. The re­port­ing is sketchy, the defin­i­tions of crimes is some­times sketchy, schools are in­con­sist­ent in what they re­port, stu­dents are in­con­sist­ent with what they re­port.”¦ And you know a lot of schools are still not re­port­ing it ac­cur­ately. So we’re not do­ing it as a com­par­at­ive. You can’t com­pare apples to apples [here].”

However, even if bet­ter data were avail­able, U.S. News’s own data dir­ect­or, Robert Morse, adds on his blog, the pub­lic­a­tion would not in­clude sexu­al-as­sault in­form­a­tion in its al­gorithm. “Cam­pus safety is not among the factors U.S. News be­lieves is dir­ectly tied to aca­dem­ic qual­ity, and we be­lieve that it should not be part of our main rank­ing meth­od­o­logy, even if it could be meas­ured,” Morse wrote last week.

Reps. Jack­ie Spei­er, D-Cal­if., and Patrick Mee­han, R-Pa., who were among 12 House mem­bers who sent a let­ter to U.S. News last month ask­ing that the data be in­cluded, said that the pub­lic­a­tion had not aler­ted them of its de­cision. But Spei­er ex­pressed dis­ap­point­ment.

“I think that they mis­judge their read­er­ship,” Spei­er said, after hear­ing of the de­cision. “The very first ques­tion on cam­pus tours that is asked by par­ents in the Q&A ses­sions is, tell us about what you’re do­ing about safety for girls on cam­pus…. There’s a huge wake-up call in this coun­try by par­ents who are very alarmed by the fact that 20 per­cent of col­lege co-eds will be either sexu­ally as­saul­ted or [ex­per­i­ence] an at­temp­ted sexu­al as­sault … dur­ing their col­lege ca­reer. And that is sig­ni­fic­ant. And if U.S. News & World Re­port doesn’t think that that’s a sig­ni­fic­ant ele­ment in rank­ing the uni­versit­ies, then they’ll hear from their read­ers, I’m sure.”

Mee­han said he was “en­cour­aged” by the pub­lic­a­tion’s de­cision to in­clude any sexu­al-as­sault rat­ings on its site, but ad­ded in a state­ment: “My hope is that U.S. News & World Re­port will a de­vel­op a means to meas­ure the re­spons­ive­ness of col­leges and uni­versit­ies to in­cid­ents of sexu­al as­sault and the avail­ab­il­ity of re­sources crit­ic­al to vic­tims like coun­sel­ing and med­ic­al care. The ob­ject­ive is to in­centiv­ize a vic­tim-centered ap­proach among col­leges to ad­dress­ing sexu­al vi­ol­ence on cam­pus.”

Mee­han said he is hope­ful that the move is the first step in a longer con­ver­sa­tion with mem­bers of Con­gress about the is­sue.

Kelly agrees that sexu­al-as­sault stat­ist­ics are a ma­jor con­cern for par­ents and stu­dents dur­ing the school-search pro­cess, but he ar­gued that they are among a num­ber of factors that fall out­side of the pur­view of the rank­ings, which are fo­cused solely on aca­dem­ic stand­ards. However, Kelly said that along­side the sexu­al-as­sault in­form­a­tion in­cluded on each col­lege page in U.S. News’s 2014 rank­ings (which come out in early Septem­ber), they’ll provide in­form­a­tion on how par­ents and stu­dents can learn more about crime and safety on a par­tic­u­lar cam­pus. “It’s up to you, the par­ents and the stu­dents to pur­sue that,” Kelly said.

But he also ad­ded that, while the de­cision not to in­clude sexu­al as­sault in the rank­ings ap­plies “for the fore­see­able fu­ture,” it could change as data im­proves. “We take this very ser­i­ously. We’re not say­ing we won’t deal with this.”¦ We con­tin­ue to fol­low this. We know it’s im­port­ant. Just some­times data can’t do what you like it to do,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×