Dems Accuse GOP of Hypocrisy for Supporting Costly Tax Credit

A research and development bill would cost $156 billion over 10 years — and Republicans have not proposed revenue to offset it.

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) speaks at a press conference on immigration reform on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., November 13, 2013. 
National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
May 8, 2014, 3:50 p.m.

Des­pite a White House veto threat, the GOP-led House plans to vote Fri­day on a bill mak­ing per­man­ent a re­search-and-de­vel­op­ment tax cred­it for busi­nesses — without off­set­ting the $156 bil­lion cost over the next dec­ade.

The White House and some Demo­crats who op­pose the meas­ure as-is have ac­know­ledged they sup­port the aim, but they won’t back the bill be­cause they say it rep­res­ents a case of polit­ic­al in­con­sist­ency — if not hy­po­crisy. They point out that Re­pub­lic­ans con­tin­ue to in­sist that an ex­ten­sion of long-term un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance be fully paid for.

Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er told re­port­ers this week that “we are for the R&D tax cred­it,” but that Re­pub­lic­ans “are do­ing the right thing in the wrong way.”

Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor re­spon­ded to the Demo­crat­ic po­s­i­tion­ing by call­ing it “iron­ic” and proof that Demo­crats are “all talk and no ac­tion on jobs,” which he said the meas­ure will help to pro­duce.

Mean­while, as a pre­curs­or to the floor vote, the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget on Tues­day re­leased a state­ment say­ing the pres­id­ent will be ad­vised to veto the meas­ure if it passes both cham­bers. The state­ment de­scribed the pro­jec­ted cost as adding to the na­tion’s de­fi­cit over 10 years “more than 15 times the cost of the pro­posed ex­ten­sion of the emer­gency un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits.”

But Can­tor ar­gued, “This has been a pro­vi­sion that has ex­pired over and over again over the last 30 years.” He ad­ded, “This is one of the most gen­er­at­ive things we can do from a policy stand­point that has been con­firmed by in­de­pend­ent eco­nom­ic ana­lys­is, to grow jobs and to have Amer­ica work again for more people.” 

Can­tor noted that “the pres­id­ent him­self has come out on re­cord to be for the per­man­ent ex­ten­sion of [the] R&D tax cred­it.”

In fact, in its state­ment this week, OMB did ac­know­ledge that the ad­min­is­tra­tion would be sup­port­ive of mak­ing the R&D cred­it per­man­ent — that is, if the costs of the bill were off­set by such things as clos­ing tax loop­holes, for in­stance.

OMB even lauded the meas­ure as one that would al­low busi­nesses to make in­vest­ments now with con­fid­ence that they will be eli­gible for the cred­it in the fu­ture. And four-fifths of the R&D cred­it, the White House ex­plained, is at­trib­ut­able to salar­ies of U.S. work­ers per­form­ing U.S.-based re­search — mean­ing that the cred­it helps cre­ate high-skilled jobs and en­cour­ages new in­nov­a­tions and fu­ture pro­ductiv­ity.

But it also noted that House Re­pub­lic­ans had passed a budget res­ol­u­tion that re­quired off­set­ting any tax ex­tenders that were made per­man­ent with oth­er rev­en­ue meas­ures. Re­pub­lic­ans “are rush­ing” to make busi­ness tax cuts per­man­ent, OMB said, but are pro­pos­ing to let oth­er im­prove­ments to the Earned In­come Tax Cred­it, Child Tax Cred­it, and tax cred­its for edu­ca­tion ex­pire.

“The ad­min­is­tra­tion wants to work with Con­gress to make pro­gress on meas­ures that strengthen the eco­nomy and help middle-class fam­il­ies, in­clud­ing pro-growth busi­ness tax re­form,” the White House said. “However, mak­ing tra­di­tion­al tax ex­tenders per­man­ent without off­sets rep­res­ents the wrong ap­proach.”

Hoy­er com­plained that when it comes to feed­ing chil­dren and “help­ing people who are un­em­ployed through no fault of their own, as­sist­ing people struck by a vi­cious storm named Sandy — then there’s a lot of dis­cus­sion on the Re­pub­lic­an side about, ‘we have to pay for things.’ “

But when it comes to tax cuts, Hoy­er said, there’s a dif­fer­ent GOP tune.

“This takes no cour­age to put on the floor or to vote for. None. Zero. Zip. Tax cuts are easy to vote for,” Hoy­er said. “Pay­ing for what you buy is dif­fi­cult to vote for. And all of the wringing of hands and gnash­ing of teeth with ref­er­ence to the de­fi­cit seems to go by the boards when the Re­pub­lic­ans talk of tax cuts.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×