House Votes to Hold Former IRS Official Lois Lerner in Contempt

Republicans take their campaign against the agency to the next level.

Lois Lerner, former director of the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), listens during a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Capitol Hill March 5, 2014 in Washington, DC. Chairman Darrell Issa(R-CA) questioned witness Lerner, to see if the Internal Revenue Service has been targeting US citizens based on their political beliefs. Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to testify.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
May 7, 2014, 3:04 p.m.

The House voted to hold former In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice of­fi­cial Lois Lern­er in con­tempt on a 231-187 vote Wed­nes­day, as Re­pub­lic­ans work to un­cov­er the depth of Lern­er’s in­volve­ment in the agency’s tar­get­ing of con­ser­vat­ive groups from 2010 to May 2013.

Six Demo­crats broke with their party to sup­port the con­tempt vote: Ron Barber of Ari­zona, John Bar­row of Geor­gia, Col­lin Peterson of Min­nesota, Mike McIntyre of North Car­o­lina, Nick Ra­hall of West Vir­gin­ia, and Patrick Murphy of Flor­ida. All are fa­cing Re­pub­lic­an chal­lengers in tough dis­tricts for Demo­crats in Novem­ber.

“Who’s been fired over the tar­get­ing of con­ser­vat­ive groups by the IRS? No one that I’m aware of. Who’s gone to jail for vi­ol­at­ing the law? When is the ad­min­is­tra­tion go­ing to tell the Amer­ic­an people the truth?” House Speak­er John Boehner told re­port­ers Wed­nes­day morn­ing. “One would have to guess, if they’re not will­ing to tell the Amer­ic­an people the truth, it must not be very pretty.” 

Lern­er was found in con­tempt of Con­gress after in­vok­ing her Fifth Amend­ment right against self-in­crim­in­a­tion at a House hear­ing last May. House Re­pub­lic­ans ar­gue that, be­cause Lern­er gave an open­ing speech testi­fy­ing to her in­no­cence in the in­quiry be­fore plead­ing the Fifth, she had waived her right to re­fuse to testi­fy. Re­pub­lic­ans sub­poenaed Lern­er to testi­fy again in March, when she again as­ser­ted her right to re­main si­lent, set­ting off the con­tempt pro­ceed­ings.

The is­sue is now headed for the courts, where a judge will have to de­term­ine wheth­er Re­pub­lic­ans’ claim that Lern­er waived her rights is cor­rect. The House also voted Wed­nes­day to re­quest that At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er ap­point a spe­cial pro­sec­utor in the case. Twenty-six Demo­crats, in­clud­ing those who sup­por­ted the con­tempt vote, backed this second vote. If con­victed, Lern­er faces a max­im­um pen­alty of a $100,000 fine and up to a year in jail.

This is the second time in as many years that the House has voted to hold a mem­ber of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion in con­tempt. In 2012, House Re­pub­lic­ans and 17 Demo­crats voted to hold Hold­er in con­tempt of Con­gress over his re­fus­al to turn over doc­u­ments re­lated to the Fast and Furi­ous scan­dal. That con­tempt vote went nowhere, as mem­bers of the Justice De­part­ment an­nounced they would not pur­sue crim­in­al charges or a grand jury against the head of their own de­part­ment. The ad­min­is­tra­tion later in­voked ex­ec­ut­ive priv­ilege over the doc­u­ments in ques­tion.

But Re­pub­lic­ans say they feel more con­fid­ent that the con­tempt vote against Lern­er will be suc­cess­ful. “Eric Hold­er, of course, is the highest law-en­force­ment of­ficer in the coun­try. Lois Lern­er is not,” said Rep. John Flem­ing, R-La. “And so she doesn’t en­joy the same level of pro­tec­tion that he does per­son­ally, and also she can’t claim ex­ec­ut­ive priv­ilege, which Eric Hold­er per­haps can.”

“There’s a fairly sub­stan­tial dif­fer­ence between ask­ing [Hold­er] to … pro­sec­ute him­self and someone else,” a seni­or House Re­pub­lic­an aide said.

But it’s un­likely that the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­sponse to Con­gress’s hold­ing Lern­er in con­tempt will be any dif­fer­ent. Lern­er has re­portedly already been in­ter­viewed by the Justice De­part­ment, and an­onym­ous “law-en­force­ment of­fi­cials” told The Wall Street Journ­al in Janu­ary that no crim­in­al charges would be filed against IRS of­fi­cials over their tar­get­ing of con­ser­vat­ive groups. Pres­id­ent Obama told Fox News dur­ing his Su­per Bowl in­ter­view that he does not be­lieve the IRS dis­played “a smidgen of cor­rup­tion” in the mat­ter.

All the same, Re­pub­lic­ans are hope­ful that the con­tempt vote will provide some real pres­sure for Lern­er to testi­fy.

“Ul­ti­mately, she’s go­ing to be forced to either come for­ward and testi­fy, or she’s go­ing to have to ap­ply for im­munity and testi­fy,” Flem­ing says. “And pres­sure will con­tin­ue to mount un­til that hap­pens…. And if not, again, I think there’s a lot of mount­ing evid­ence against her — crim­in­al evid­ence — and so we’re go­ing to con­tin­ue to mount the pres­sure and this is just a next step in that dir­ec­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×