Where Is It OK to Pray in America?

The Supreme Court has ruled that prayer at town-hall meetings is acceptable. But what would cross the line?

National Journal
Marina Koren
See more stories about...
Marina Koren
May 6, 2014, 8:54 a.m.

State-sponsored pray­ers in pub­lic schools have been banned for more than 50 years. But the latest Su­preme Court rul­ing sug­gests the para­met­ers of the prac­tice re­main murky out­side the classroom.

The highest court of the land ruled Monday in fa­vor of an up­state New York town, which had been sued by two res­id­ents — one Jew­ish, an­oth­er athe­ist — for open­ing its monthly meet­ings with a pray­er. The ce­re­mo­ni­al re­marks, the com­plain­ants said, were al­most al­ways Chris­ti­an, and at times ex­pli­citly sec­tari­an, which led the pair to feel “ex­cluded and dis­respec­ted.”

The Court didn’t agree. “Of­fense, however, does not equate to co­er­cion,” said Justice An­thony M. Kennedy, who wrote the ma­jor­ity opin­ion.

“The in­clu­sion of a brief, ce­re­mo­ni­al pray­er as part of a lar­ger ex­er­cise in civic re­cog­ni­tion sug­gests that its pur­pose and ef­fect are to ac­know­ledge re­li­gious lead­ers and the in­sti­tu­tions they rep­res­ent rather than to ex­clude or co­erce non­be­liev­ers,” Kennedy wrote. Co­er­cion is un­con­sti­tu­tion­al un­der the es­tab­lish­ment clause of the First Amend­ment. In this case, the Court found the prac­tice of of­fer­ing pray­ers be­fore gov­ern­ment hear­ings in keep­ing with a cen­tur­ies-old tra­di­tion that ex­ists in Con­gress and state le­gis­latures.

So, school-sponsored pray­er, not OK. Town-hall-sponsored pray­er, ac­cept­able. But when does group pray­er in a pub­lic set­ting be­come co­er­cion?

“To the ex­tent co­er­cion is rel­ev­ant to the Es­tab­lish­ment Clause ana­lys­is, it is ac­tu­al leg­al co­er­cion that counts — not the ‘subtle co­er­cive pres­sures’ al­legedly felt by re­spond­ents in this case,” Justice Clar­ence Thomas wrote, who con­curred in part with the de­cision. “I would simply add, in light of the fore­go­ing his­tory of the Es­tab­lish­ment Clause, that ‘peer pres­sure, un­pleas­ant as it may be, is not co­er­cion’ either.”

The line ap­pears to lie some­where along a spec­trum between “subtle” and “ac­tu­al.” In oth­er words, it all comes down to con­text. And con­text is highly sub­ject­ive, and de­cisions about wheth­er it’s right or wrong have his­tor­ic­ally been made on a case-by-case basis.

In 1985, the Su­preme Court struck down an Alabama law that per­mit­ted a one-minute pray­er dur­ing school. In 1992, it deemed pray­er to be co­er­cive dur­ing high school gradu­ation ce­re­mon­ies. And in 2000, it banned school-or­gan­ized, stu­dent-led pray­er at high school foot­ball games.

Pray­er policy gets trick­i­er at the loc­al and state level. In Septem­ber, the city of Lib­er­al in Kan­sas voted un­an­im­ously to al­low stu­dent-led pray­er over the school’s loud­speak­er and over mi­cro­phones on the foot­ball field, a move that some town of­fi­cials said was just ask­ing for a law­suit. That same month, the speak­er of Flor­ida’s House caused fric­tion with­in the school board when he de­clared that pub­lic high school foot­ball coaches should be al­lowed to pray with their teams. In Feb­ru­ary, an Ari­zona school board re­in­stated pre-meet­ing pray­er, but not without con­tro­versy. And as re­cently as Monday, an Ok­lahoma pub­lic school banned coach-led pray­ers at base­ball games, after of­fi­cials had re­ceived re­ports that the prac­tice had been re­sur­rec­ted.

In her dis­sent, Justice Elena Kagan weighed in on the murky is­sue of when and where pub­lic pray­er is ac­cept­able. She up­held the long-stand­ing tra­di­tion of open­ing con­gres­sion­al and state le­gis­lat­ive meet­ings with pray­er, but gave sev­er­al hy­po­thet­ic­al scen­ari­os in which the prac­tice would cross a con­sti­tu­tion­al line in her view. Here’s one:

It’s elec­tion day, and you head over to your loc­al polling place to vote. As you and oth­ers wait to give your names and re­ceive your bal­lots, an elec­tion of­fi­cial asks every­one there to join him in pray­er. He says: “We pray this [day] for the guid­ance of the Holy Spir­it as [we vote]… Let’s just say the Our Fath­er to­geth­er. ‘Our Fath­er, who art in Heav­en, hal­lowed by thy name; thy King­dom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in Heav­en…’ ” And after he con­cludes, he makes the sign of the cross, and ap­pears to wait ex­pect­antly for you and the oth­er pro­spect­ive voters to do so too.

This ex­ample, Kagan said, would likely be deemed un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, be­cause sec­tari­an pray­er would in­fuse gov­ern­ment­al activ­it­ies whose par­ti­cipants are al­most all ci­vil­ians, not fed­er­al em­ploy­ees. That ra­tionale, she wrote, is why the New York town should have lost Monday’s case:

When a per­son goes to court, a polling place, or an im­mig­ra­tion pro­ceed­ing — I could go on: to a zon­ing agency, a pa­role board hear­ing, or the DMV — gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials do not en­gage in sec­tari­an wor­ship, nor do they ask her to do like­wise. They all par­ti­cip­ate in the busi­ness of gov­ern­ment not as Chris­ti­ans, Jews, Muslims (and more), but only as Amer­ic­ans — none of them dif­fer­ent from any oth­er for that civic pur­pose.

What’s dif­fer­ent, Kagan writes, about a town meet­ing?

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×