Why Every Member of Congress Gets a Monthly Porn Delivery

Larry Flynt has sent a monthly copy of Hustler to every congressional office for the last 30 years, and members of Congress can’t stop it.

Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
April 17, 2014, 1 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al of­fices have a porn prob­lem, but it’s not ex­actly what you think.

Since 1983, Larry Flynt has sent the monthly magazine he foun­ded, Hust­ler, to each and every mem­ber of Con­gress.

The dirty mag comes in a plain ma­nila en­vel­ope, fairly un­detect­able to the poor in­tern or staffer tasked with open­ing the mail. And every month, there it is: Hust­ler, fea­tur­ing dozens of na­ked or scantly dressed wo­men, vul­gar com­ics, and art­icles, some satir­ic­al, on polit­ics, so­ci­ety, and sex.

It’s not like mem­bers of Con­gress haven’t tried to stop the magazines from com­ing. They just can’t stop it leg­ally.

Fol­low­ing the com­plaints from 264 con­gres­sion­al of­fices in 1984, the U.S. Postal Ser­vice asked the U.S. Dis­trict Court for the Dis­trict of Columbia to block the mail­ings. But that re­quest failed when the court ruled two years later that the de­liv­ery of the magazine could not be stopped. The court wrote:

Re­ceiv­ing Hust­ler once each month would not un­duly bur­den a Mem­ber of Con­gress. Mem­bers are not forced to read the magazine or oth­er of the mail they re­ceive in volume. We can­not ima­gine that Con­gres­sion­al of­fices all lack wastebas­kets.

For Hust­ler, it was a First Amend­ment is­sue. This was Flynt’s right to pe­ti­tion the gov­ern­ment, he ar­gued, and the court agreed. Or as Flynt told The Hill in 2011, “Moses freed the Jews, Lin­coln freed the slaves, and I just wanted to free all the neur­ot­ics.”

Thirty years later, the con­gres­sion­al sub­scrip­tion count re­mains the same: 535. The magazine is not sent to mem­bers of the ex­ec­ut­ive branch, though.

Some mem­bers of Con­gress have made their ob­jec­tions to re­ceiv­ing the magazine pub­lic. “It’s in­sult­ing be­ha­vi­or on the part of the pub­lish­er, but not sur­pris­ing,” said Rep. Jim Math­eson, a Utah Demo­crat, in 2006.

For the most part, however, re­ceiv­ing the magazine is just a part of every­day life in con­gres­sion­al of­fices.

Some staffers say it has be­come a light­hearted way for them to have a little fun — and not just by read­ing it. Most of the time the magazine ends up in the trash. But take these five ex­amples from staffers (quotes are ed­ited to pre­serve an­onym­ity):

I let in­terns know they will re­ceive an in­ter­est­ing magazine and they should just throw it away.

I “for­get” to men­tion it to in­terns and wait to watch the look of hor­ror on their face when they open it in a con­gres­sion­al of­fice.

I have a friend that I asked one day if he liked to read. He said, “Sure, I read a bit.” Since then, I have sent him every ran­dom book our of­fice has re­ceived, in­clud­ing a couple Hust­lers for some re­fresh­ing ma­ter­i­al. He still has no idea it’s me.

For a while, the in­terns, after their ini­tial shock and be­fuddle­ment, were dir­ec­ted to save the Hust­lers. We even­tu­ally gave a cowork­er the whole year’s sup­ply for Secret Santa and then she would mail them to her boy­friend in Ir­aq. Cer­tainly one of the least-her­al­ded ways the of­fice sup­por­ted our troops.

Some bud­dies and I col­lec­ted them for sev­er­al months, and then sent them all to the same friend in one day. The re­cip­i­ent worked in the back of­fice, so they’d be de­livered to him from that of­fice’s staff as­sist­ant in piles as the mail came in.

And the folks at Hust­ler are fully aware that the magazine is treated this way. As Ar­thur Sando, a spokes­man for the Beverly Hills, Cal­if.-based magazine, put it to me, “We as­sume, at this point, that staff mem­bers are either read­ing it or toss­ing it.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4891) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×