More Than 15,000 Federal Employees Make at Least $200K

National Journal
Eric Katz, Government Executive
See more stories about...
Eric Katz, Government Executive
April 16, 2014, 1:56 p.m.

Most of the dis­cus­sion of pay for fed­er­al em­ploy­ees in re­cent months and years has been about in­suf­fi­cient or non-ex­ist­ent raises, pay gaps and budget short­falls.

Not all feds are mak­ing out so poorly, however.

A new data­base com­piled by Fed­, us­ing data from the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment and oth­er agen­cies, shows more than 15,000 fed­er­al em­ploy­ees earned at least $200,000 in 2013. That’s roughly 1 per­cent of all fed­er­al work­ers on the list; some em­ploy­ees in na­tion­al se­cur­ity po­s­i­tions were not in­cluded in the data­base.

The vast ma­jor­ity of the top 1 per­cent of feds were doc­tors at the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment. The highest earn­ing em­ploy­ee was a Vet­er­ans Health Ad­min­is­tra­tion doc­tor in Pitt­s­burgh, who took in just more than $400,000 last year. More than 1,200 em­ploy­ees made more than $300,000.

Oth­er agen­cies that re­quire a highly spe­cial­ized work­force paid sev­er­al em­ploy­ees at least $200,000, in­clud­ing the Na­tion­al In­sti­tutes of Health, Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion, Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion, Of­fice of the Comp­troller of the Cur­rency, Fin­an­cial Hous­ing Fin­ance Agency, and the Se­cur­it­ies and Ex­change Com­mis­sion.

All of these em­ploy­ees are paid on sys­tems spe­cif­ic to their agency or oc­cu­pa­tion. Some of these sys­tems have much high­er pay caps than the Gen­er­al Sched­ule, which sets the salar­ies for the vast ma­jor­ity of fed­er­al em­ploy­ees and capped an­nu­al pay — be­fore ad­just­ing for loc­al­ity — at just less than $130,000.

Even mem­bers of the Seni­or Ex­ec­ut­ive Ser­vice have their pay capped at $181,500 for 2014. The highest paid feds on the Ex­ec­ut­ive Sched­ule, such as agency heads and the vice pres­id­ent, will earn $201,700. Deputy heads will re­ceive less than $200,000.

This pie chart breaks down the per­cent­age of em­ploy­ees on each of the fed­er­al pay scales, ac­cord­ing to the latest data from OPM:


Many fed­er­al em­ploy­ees are able to boost their base salar­ies each year through bo­nuses.

Most bo­nuses are re­l­at­ively small — few­er than 1,000 feds re­ceived a five-fig­ure pay bump, ac­cord­ing to the data­base. Some top ex­ec­ut­ives, however, were able to really cash in.

Six­teen fed­er­al em­ploy­ees re­ceived bo­nuses of more than $50,000. The highest award was nearly $63,000.

Ban­ning Bo­nuses?

Some law­makers want to en­sure that cer­tain fed­er­al em­ploy­ees do not re­ceive such a pay bump.

A group of con­ser­vat­ive law­makers wrote a let­ter to House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­man Hal Ro­gers, R-Ky., to cut off any fund­ing for In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice work­ers in­volved in the polit­ic­al tar­get­ing of mostly con­ser­vat­ive groups when con­duct­ing audits.

The con­gress­men — Reps. Dan Ben­ishek, R-Mich.; Kerry Bentivolio, R-Mich.; Paul Gos­ar, R-Ar­iz.; Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan.; Wal­ter Jones, R-N.C.; Pete Olson, R-Texas; and Steve Stock­man, R-Texas — said no em­ploy­ee in the Tax Ex­empt and Gov­ern­ment En­tit­ies Di­vi­sion should be eli­gible for a bo­nus.

“The power to tax is the power to des­troy, and these em­ploy­ees at the IRS com­mit­ted a grave in­justice to count­less Amer­ic­ans,” the law­makers wrote. “It sends the wrong mes­sage to the Amer­ic­an people that Con­gress would al­low these ‘per­form­ance awards’ to be doled out after the wrong­do­ing oc­curred.”

The IRS agreed in Feb­ru­ary to par­tially re­in­state its bo­nus pro­gram after it had pre­vi­ously an­nounced plans to can­cel it.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
1 days ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.