Imagine a world where, instead of having to manually fill out the same boxes on your tax forms every year, the IRS filled out your paperwork for you in advance and told you how much they think you owe, using information the IRS already gets from banks and employers. If you agreed with their estimate, you could just sign the paperwork and return it. If you disagreed with their estimate, you could file your taxes the way you have been doing.
Sounds like a pretty good deal, right?
Not for the makers of TurboTax, the online tax-preparation software that millions of Americans use to file their taxes every year. Intuit, the company that owns TurboTax, has lobbied hard to prevent automatic tax filing from becoming a reality.
On Monday, ProPublica followed up on its report from last year about Intuit’s attempts to stymie return-free tax-filing legislation. ProPublica found that, in the past five years, Intuit has spent $11.5 million lobbying against return-free filing at the federal level.
The company has fought return-free filing at the state level as well. Back in 2009, California was working to implement ReadyReturn, a state program that helps low-income taxpayers file their taxes for free. Intuit ferociously lobbied against the program, and donated $1 million to a group fighting the election of state Comptroller John Chiang, who helped put the program in place.
Intuit says the IRS would exploit a return-free filing system to vacuum up as much revenue from taxpayers as possible.
“Return Free minimizes the taxpayers’ voice and instead maximizes revenue collection for government,” Julie Miller, an Intuit representative, told National Journal. “That kind of anticonsumer policy does not advance taxpayer rights, citizen empowerment, or real simplification of the tax code.”
But it isn’t just the IRS that has a vested interest in controlling how Americans pay their taxes. More than 24 million people used TurboTax to file their taxes in 2012, and the program accounted for 35 percent of Intuit’s $4.2 billion in revenue that year.
As Jordan Weissman at Slate notes, there is a more reasonable argument for not adopting a return-free filing system: The system would be less convenient for Americans with complex taxes, or for small businesses who need to give payroll information to the IRS to help out their employees. But as many as 44 percent of taxpayers would have an easier time filing their taxes, according to the Treasury Department.
Republicans would probably agree with Intuit that the IRS is not the best arbiter of how much money people owe the government. They have little trust for the IRS since the agency was accused of targeting tea-party groups for audits. A system like return-free filing, which hands more power to the IRS, would cause a political ruckus. And as long as filing your taxes remains a frustrating, overly complex process, antitax conservatives like Grover Norquist will continue to have a political punching bag.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.