This Is How Millennials Roll

Harvard study suggests young Americans’ views on the U.S. budget don’t fit neatly into a partisan box.

Focus of states: College students.  
National Journal
Ron Fournier
April 10, 2014, 6:22 a.m.

Put a hand­ful of smart mil­len­ni­als in a room and ask them to de­con­struct the U.S. budget, and what you might get is 90 pages of level-headed ana­lys­is that doesn’t fit neatly in­side a par­tis­an box.

They wouldn’t dic­tate ideo­lo­gic­al solu­tions, be­cause this gen­er­a­tion of young Amer­ic­ans is less par­tis­an and more open-minded than any oth­er. They would, however, chas­tise their par­ents’ gen­er­a­tion for ac­cept­ing stas­is and status quo, say­ing something like, “Our fu­ture hinges just as greatly on the budget­ary de­cisions our lead­ers re­fuse to make.”

I’ve seen this room — it’s at the Har­vard In­sti­tute of Polit­ics — and I’ve met the mil­len­ni­als, most not­ably ju­ni­or Daniel Back­man. He is the lead au­thor of the IOP’s “An­nu­al Re­port of the United States of Amer­ica: What Every Cit­izen Should Know about the Real State of the Na­tion,” an ex­am­in­a­tion of the na­tion’s fisc­al health that will tan­tal­ize both Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats.

For in­stance, the re­port says an­nu­al growth in Medi­care costs has fallen from 7.1 per­cent between 2000 and 2005, to 3.8 per­cent between 2007 and 2010. Though ex­perts dis­agree on why health costs have slowed, the re­port says, fed­er­al health care spend­ing at the cur­rent rate will be $770 bil­lion lower over 10 years than cur­rent pro­jec­tions.

You can al­most hear the White House yell, “Eureka!” This is a tail­or-made talk­ing point for ad­voc­ates of the em­battled Af­ford­able Care Act, good-as-gold proof for Demo­crats that Obama­care is already a suc­cess. No need to tame the U.S. debt!

At the same time, the re­port says the av­er­age monthly par­ti­cip­a­tion in the food-stamp pro­gram grew nearly 77 per­cent. The cost of the pro­gram climbed to $71.8 bil­lion in 2011 from $30.4 bil­lion four years earli­er.

Grab your ra­cial dog whistles, folks, and cue the right-wing out­rage. This is the Obama wel­fare state gone wild!

Yawn. Back­man said his gen­er­a­tion is dis­con­nec­ted from such de­bates, which too of­ten re­volve around tired talk­ing points that dis­till com­plex is­sues in­to slo­gans. He dis­misses “debt alarm­ists” (I think he was talk­ing about me), who he says over­state the threat of red ink to the na­tion’s fisc­al health, and he has no stom­ach for Re­pub­lic­an ef­forts to turn Obama­care in­to a budget­ary bo­gey­man.

“There are solu­tions, but our lead­ers don’t present them in a way to point to solu­tions,” Back­man said. “They just point fin­gers at the oth­er side and say, ‘Look, the oth­er guy’s worse than me.’”

A Demo­crat, Back­man sup­por­ted Obama but now has his doubts about the pres­id­ent’s lead­er­ship, and he no longer thinks Obama will be a trans­form­a­tion­al fig­ure like Ron­ald Re­agan. “He had a chance to be great,” Back­man sighed.

For those who might not be sat­is­fied with a clear-eyed ana­lys­is of the budget, who want a list of solu­tions and sound bites, Back­man says, cool your jets. Read his re­port. Learn the is­sues. Form con­clu­sions and policies based on a com­mon set of facts, then seek con­sensus. That’s how mil­len­ni­als roll. That’s why this coun­try, if not its cur­rent pres­id­ent, still has a chance to be great.

Dis­clos­ure: In two weeks, I join the Har­vard IOP board of ad­visers, an un­paid po­s­i­tion.

Re­lated by Fourni­er:

“No Party for This Young Man: Mil­len­ni­als Storm­ing the Gates of Wash­ing­ton”

“The Out­siders: How Can Mil­len­ni­als Change Wash­ing­ton If They Hate It?”

“Mil­len­ni­al Mad­ness: What Hap­pens If Mil­len­ni­als Bolt Polit­ics”

“Mil­len­ni­als Aban­don Obama and Obama­care”

What We're Following See More »
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
×