This Is How Millennials Roll

Harvard study suggests young Americans’ views on the U.S. budget don’t fit neatly into a partisan box.

Focus of states: College students.  
National Journal
Ron Fournier
April 10, 2014, 6:22 a.m.

Put a hand­ful of smart mil­len­ni­als in a room and ask them to de­con­struct the U.S. budget, and what you might get is 90 pages of level-headed ana­lys­is that doesn’t fit neatly in­side a par­tis­an box.

They wouldn’t dic­tate ideo­lo­gic­al solu­tions, be­cause this gen­er­a­tion of young Amer­ic­ans is less par­tis­an and more open-minded than any oth­er. They would, however, chas­tise their par­ents’ gen­er­a­tion for ac­cept­ing stas­is and status quo, say­ing something like, “Our fu­ture hinges just as greatly on the budget­ary de­cisions our lead­ers re­fuse to make.”

I’ve seen this room — it’s at the Har­vard In­sti­tute of Polit­ics — and I’ve met the mil­len­ni­als, most not­ably ju­ni­or Daniel Back­man. He is the lead au­thor of the IOP’s “An­nu­al Re­port of the United States of Amer­ica: What Every Cit­izen Should Know about the Real State of the Na­tion,” an ex­am­in­a­tion of the na­tion’s fisc­al health that will tan­tal­ize both Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats.

For in­stance, the re­port says an­nu­al growth in Medi­care costs has fallen from 7.1 per­cent between 2000 and 2005, to 3.8 per­cent between 2007 and 2010. Though ex­perts dis­agree on why health costs have slowed, the re­port says, fed­er­al health care spend­ing at the cur­rent rate will be $770 bil­lion lower over 10 years than cur­rent pro­jec­tions.

You can al­most hear the White House yell, “Eureka!” This is a tail­or-made talk­ing point for ad­voc­ates of the em­battled Af­ford­able Care Act, good-as-gold proof for Demo­crats that Obama­care is already a suc­cess. No need to tame the U.S. debt!

At the same time, the re­port says the av­er­age monthly par­ti­cip­a­tion in the food-stamp pro­gram grew nearly 77 per­cent. The cost of the pro­gram climbed to $71.8 bil­lion in 2011 from $30.4 bil­lion four years earli­er.

Grab your ra­cial dog whistles, folks, and cue the right-wing out­rage. This is the Obama wel­fare state gone wild!

Yawn. Back­man said his gen­er­a­tion is dis­con­nec­ted from such de­bates, which too of­ten re­volve around tired talk­ing points that dis­till com­plex is­sues in­to slo­gans. He dis­misses “debt alarm­ists” (I think he was talk­ing about me), who he says over­state the threat of red ink to the na­tion’s fisc­al health, and he has no stom­ach for Re­pub­lic­an ef­forts to turn Obama­care in­to a budget­ary bo­gey­man.

“There are solu­tions, but our lead­ers don’t present them in a way to point to solu­tions,” Back­man said. “They just point fin­gers at the oth­er side and say, ‘Look, the oth­er guy’s worse than me.’”

A Demo­crat, Back­man sup­por­ted Obama but now has his doubts about the pres­id­ent’s lead­er­ship, and he no longer thinks Obama will be a trans­form­a­tion­al fig­ure like Ron­ald Re­agan. “He had a chance to be great,” Back­man sighed.

For those who might not be sat­is­fied with a clear-eyed ana­lys­is of the budget, who want a list of solu­tions and sound bites, Back­man says, cool your jets. Read his re­port. Learn the is­sues. Form con­clu­sions and policies based on a com­mon set of facts, then seek con­sensus. That’s how mil­len­ni­als roll. That’s why this coun­try, if not its cur­rent pres­id­ent, still has a chance to be great.

Dis­clos­ure: In two weeks, I join the Har­vard IOP board of ad­visers, an un­paid po­s­i­tion.

Re­lated by Fourni­er:

“No Party for This Young Man: Mil­len­ni­als Storm­ing the Gates of Wash­ing­ton”

“The Out­siders: How Can Mil­len­ni­als Change Wash­ing­ton If They Hate It?”

“Mil­len­ni­al Mad­ness: What Hap­pens If Mil­len­ni­als Bolt Polit­ics”

“Mil­len­ni­als Aban­don Obama and Obama­care”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×