It’s Not Just a Pay Gap: Women Are at Higher Risk of Downward Economic Mobility Than Men

Democrats are highlighting the gender pay gap. But economic inequalities are more complicated than just paychecks.

Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) speaks during a press conference to urge Congress to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act, on Capitol Hill April 1, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
April 8, 2014, 8:12 a.m.

Sen­ate Demo­crats and Pres­id­ent Obama are spend­ing much of this week try­ing to rally sup­port for the Paycheck Fair­ness Act, which would at­tempt to de­crease the pay gap between men and wo­men by, among oth­er things, mak­ing it il­leg­al for em­ploy­ers to pun­ish em­ploy­ees for talk­ing about their com­pens­a­tion. The ac­tion sur­round­ing the bill is all about mes­saging: It has vir­tu­ally no chance of be­com­ing law, but it could serve as a polit­ic­al fo­cus for the 2014 midterm cam­paign.

But the way the bill is be­ing sold to the pub­lic doesn’t get at the full pic­ture of the eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity between men and wo­men. It’s not just about the pay gap, where wo­men make either 77 per­cent or 82 per­cent of what men make, de­pend­ing on who you ask.

Eco­nom­ic mo­bil­ity is dis­tinctly dif­fer­ent for daugh­ters than it is for sons.

Ad­jus­ted for in­fla­tion, daugh­ters in all eco­nom­ic groups from 2001 to 2009 were work­ing more hours and earn­ing great­er hourly wages than their moth­ers did from 1968 to 1972, ac­cord­ing to new re­search from the Pew Char­it­able Trusts.

 That trans­lates to a great­er over­all per­cent­age wage in­crease than sons made over that peri­od com­pared with their fath­ers. So that’s the good news for eco­nom­ic equal­ity. The bad news: Across all wage quin­tiles, daugh­ters over the same time peri­od are still earn­ing less than their fath­ers did roughly 30 years ago by me­di­an hourly wage, ad­jus­ted for in­fla­tion.

To look at the is­sue a bit dif­fer­ently: While a large ma­jor­ity of wo­men now make more than wo­men did 30-plus years ago, a much smal­ler per­cent­age of wo­men are now earn­ing more than men did back then.


That said, the gender pay gap has shrunk dra­mat­ic­ally in the past 30 years — Pew has the shrink­age at 20 cents an hour, down to 16 cents today from 36 cents in 1980. But the mo­bil­ity pic­ture over that time frame is hazi­er across genders. As Richard V. Reeves and Joanna Ven­at­or re­cently laid out at Brook­ings, it’s just a bit harder for wo­men to be up­wardly mo­bile than it is for men.

Wo­men born to par­ents in the low­est-in­come quin­tile are much more likely to stay there than men born to par­ents at the bot­tom are, and they’re less likely than those men to make it to some of the high­er quin­tiles:

(Brook­ings)

And nearly across the eco­nom­ic board, wo­men are at a great­er risk of down­ward mo­bil­ity than men are.

(Brook­ings)

Eco­nom­ic fair­ness between genders isn’t just about the dif­fer­ence in an hourly wage. It’s also about how the over­all eco­nomy treats men and wo­men, what risks they see, and what chances they see for im­prove­ment over past gen­er­a­tions. It’s about pay, but it’s also about the chances of suc­cess, es­pe­cially for wo­men who are single moth­ers. Over the last sev­er­al dec­ades, wo­men have not seen the same eco­nom­ic ad­vant­ages as men. It’s a more com­plic­ated prob­lem. But Con­gress is ex­tremely un­likely to do any­thing to al­ter paychecks, so there’s no real reas­on to think Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans will be able to find com­mon ground to ad­dress mo­bil­ity.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
×