How Democrats Play the Obstruction Game

Harry Reid keeps filling up the “amendment tree,” leaving Republicans with few options.

Senate Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) listens during an event on Capitol Hill on April 3, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
April 7, 2014, 1 a.m.

If you’ve been pay­ing at­ten­tion to the Sen­ate floor re­cently, you’ve likely heard a Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or com­plain­ing about the “amend­ment tree,” an­oth­er tool used by the Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity to pre­vent Re­pub­lic­ans from present­ing their own pro­pos­als for a vote.

Lately, the tree seems to be bear­ing more than its share of Demo­crat­ic fruit, Re­pub­lic­ans com­plain.

“When the Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship de­cides to bring a bill to the floor, far more of­ten than not we are blocked from of­fer­ing any amend­ments,” Sen. Or­rin Hatch, R-Utah, said on the floor last week.

Es­sen­tially, the “tree” rep­res­ents all the amend­ments that are in­cluded in a par­tic­u­lar bill; up to 11 are ac­cep­ted. Of late, the Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity has taken to “filling the tree” on ma­jor pieces of le­gis­la­tion, leav­ing no room for Re­pub­lic­an pro­pos­als.

Many of these Demo­crat­ic pro­pos­als are filler, mak­ing in­fin­ites­im­al changes to bills that of­ten don’t end up be­com­ing law any­way. The bulk of them are second-de­gree amend­ments, which is to say, amend­ments of amend­ments. When one falls, the oth­ers topple like dom­in­oes. But that’s typ­ic­ally re­served for the last minute, leav­ing Re­pub­lic­ans no time to re­place them with their own.

These amend­ments typ­ic­ally make very small, and some­times even con­flict­ing, changes to the un­der­ly­ing bill. One of Re­id’s amend­ments filed on the un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance ex­ten­sion bill, which is ex­pec­ted to pass the Sen­ate on Monday, for ex­ample, changes the en­act­ment date of the le­gis­la­tion to one day after the pres­id­ent signs the bill. An­oth­er changes it to two days after the bill is en­acted, a third to three days, and on and on over the course of 11 dif­fer­ent amend­ments, up to a six-day delay.

None of those amend­ments made it in­to the fi­nal le­gis­la­tion; some were dropped Wed­nes­day, while oth­ers were with­drawn Thursday on a ma­jor­ity vote just be­fore the Sen­ate filed clo­ture on the bill, which means no new amend­ments will be con­sidered.

Re­id re­buffed sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans’ calls for great­er par­ti­cip­a­tion in the amend­ment pro­cess last week, ar­guing that their amend­ments are aimed not at in­flu­en­cing the un­der­ly­ing le­gis­la­tion, but at pre­vent­ing it from passing.

“There are more than two-dozen amend­ments on this bill alone deal­ing with Obama­care, re­peal­ing it in dif­fer­ent ways,” Re­id ar­gued. “Sev­er­al oth­er amend­ments have been singled out that we have be­fore the body to at­tack the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ef­forts to pro­tect the en­vir­on­ment. The protests of Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors to the con­trary not­with­stand­ing, these amend­ments show that the oth­er side of the aisle is not ser­i­ous about un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance be­ne­fits…. What are they try­ing to do? Kill ex­ten­ded un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits.”

Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans tried Thursday to table (or, kill) one of Re­id’s amend­ments to make room for one of their own. But with Demo­crats in the ma­jor­ity, that move failed on a 46-50 vote. Speak­ing on the floor, Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., called the re­peated dis­missal of Re­pub­lic­an amend­ments “in­con­sist­ent with all of the his­tory and tra­di­tions of the Sen­ate.”

This has be­come a pat­tern, much to Re­pub­lic­ans’ chag­rin. “Over the past num­ber of years, the ma­jor­ity has called up a bill and then im­me­di­ately filed clo­ture as if we were fili­bus­ter­ing, when we don’t have any in­ten­tion to fili­buster. All we want is to be able to call up amend­ments,” Hatch said last week. “But, in ad­di­tion to fil­ing clo­ture, the ma­jor­ity will fill the tree, mak­ing [it] im­possible for any­one to call up an amend­ment. Frankly, this is not the way to run the Sen­ate.”

But Re­pub­lic­ans re­cog­nize that they won’t al­ways be in the minor­ity and the way Re­id has con­trolled the Sen­ate over the last six years could come back to haunt him. “I think it is a bad thing to do. However, the prin­ciple has been star­ted and the pre­ced­ent has been set,” Hatch warned.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story misid­en­ti­fied Or­rin Hatch. He is a Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or from Utah.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4872) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×