Ethics Panel Will Continue Investigating McMorris Rodgers, Mullin Cases

The House Ethics Committee could have dropped the cases, but chose to keep going.

Cathy McMorris Rodgers speaks at a press conference at the Capitol. 
National Journal
Billy House
March 24, 2014, 11:29 a.m.

The House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee on Monday an­nounced it will fur­ther in­vest­ig­ate sep­ar­ate mat­ters in­volving Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence Chair Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers and fresh­man Rep. Mark­wayne Mul­lin.

The al­leg­a­tions in­volving Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers, of Wash­ing­ton, in­volve claims by her former press sec­ret­ary that she vi­ol­ated an ob­scure House rule against coming­ling cam­paign and tax­pay­er re­sources in her race for con­fer­ence chair in late 2012.

The mat­ter in­volving Mul­lin, an Ok­lahoma Re­pub­lic­an, seeks to re­solve wheth­er he vi­ol­ated House rules and re­ceived out­side com­pens­a­tion in his first year in Con­gress as an of­ficer or rep­res­ent­at­ive of Mul­lin Plumb­ing and af­fil­i­ates.

The an­nounce­ments from Eth­ics Chair­man Mi­chael Con­away of Texas and Rank­ing Demo­crat Linda Sanc­hez of Cali­for­nia came with re­ports from the Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics, an in­de­pend­ent watch­dog that re­ferred the mat­ters to the com­mit­tee after do­ing ini­tial re­views of both cases.

The com­mit­tee could have dropped the cases, but in­stead chose to con­tin­ue its re­view.

In a pre­pared state­ment, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s at­tor­ney, El­li­ot Berke, down­played the news, say­ing the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee simply needed more time to sift through the facts.

“We re­cog­nize the in­sti­tu­tion­al con­straints the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee is un­der and un­der­stand it was un­able to con­duct a full re­view dur­ing this 90-day peri­od. We re­main con­fid­ent that, in time, the com­mit­tee will dis­miss the com­plaint which was based on frivol­ous al­leg­a­tions from a single source — a former em­ploy­ee who then dis­cred­ited him­self by ad­mit­ting to his own im­prop­er con­duct,” Berke said.

“Neither Con­gress­wo­man Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers nor any oth­er staff mem­bers were aware of this con­duct and countered all of the al­leg­a­tions with the facts:  At no time did they im­prop­erly mix of­fi­cial and cam­paign re­sources,” he ad­ded.

Mul­lin’s of­fice re­spon­ded with an ag­gress­ive state­ment.

“This re­view — based on an an­onym­ous com­plaint — is re­fer­ring to wheth­er we want cit­izen le­gis­lat­ors or just pro­fes­sion­al politi­cians mak­ing laws that im­pact our jobs, our fam­il­ies, and our com­munit­ies,” Mul­lin said.

“The politi­cians said Dr. Tom Coburn couldn’t de­liv­er ba­bies when he got elec­ted to the U.S. Sen­ate,” he ad­ded. “Now they are try­ing to say that I shouldn’t be in­volved in the fam­ily plumb­ing busi­ness that my wife and I have spent the last 17 years build­ing.

“Ap­par­ently it’s ac­cept­able for mem­bers of Con­gress to own stock in com­pan­ies we reg­u­late in Con­gress, but some­how our plumb­ing com­pany crosses some line. This is more of the kind of thing that leaves people scratch­ing their heads and say­ing, ‘Only in the gov­ern­ment,’ ” Mul­lin said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×