For Real Change, Beer Advocates Turn to the States

Across the country, states are advocating for crisp, thirst-quenching laws.

Samples of Lagunitas Brewing Company beers sit on a tray during a brewery tour at Lagunitas Brewing Company on February 21, 2014 in Petaluma, California.
National Journal
Emma Roller
March 12, 2014, 11:36 a.m.

State law­makers are look­ing to spur busi­ness wherever they can, but one in­dustry hopes to change loc­al pal­ates as well as loc­al eco­nom­ies: brew­er­ies.

While they haven’t had much luck in Wash­ing­ton, beer ad­voc­ates are hav­ing more suc­cess at the state level. Last year, Alabama be­came the last state to leg­al­ize home brew­ing. A bill wend­ing its way through the state Le­gis­lature this week would al­low lar­ger Alabama brew­ers to open res­taur­ants at their brew­er­ies. The only hitch: No brew­ery in Alabama is big enough to qual­i­fy for the law.

Alabama is work­ing to change that. The state is now try­ing to lure high-pro­file brew­er­ies from out of state, like Stone Brew­ing in Cali­for­nia. In 2012, Alabama ranked 49th in brew­er­ies per cap­ita. But with re­cent laws like the Alabama Brew­ery Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Act, which al­lows craft brew­ers to sell their wares where they’re brewed, Alabama is hop­ing to raise its pro­file as a des­tin­a­tion for brew­ers and beer afi­cion­ados alike.

Still, com­pared with oth­er booze, the beer in­dustry is strug­gling to keep its brand re­cog­ni­tion. Un­like years ago, more people today say they prefer drink­ing wine or li­quor in­stead of beer. Des­pite the re­l­at­ive de­cline of beer’s pop­ular­ity, there has been an ex­plo­sion of craft brew­er­ies around the coun­try — in 2012, the craft-brew­ing in­dustry saw 15 per­cent growth. Lar­ger main­stream products like Blue Moon and Pabst Blue Rib­bon are en­joy­ing rap­id growth. There are al­most 2,000 craft brew­er­ies in the U.S. There’s even a con­gres­sion­al Small Brew­ers Caucus.

And the beer in­dustry has eco­nom­ic ripple ef­fects. Ac­cord­ing to the Beer In­sti­tute, the in­dustry em­ploys roughly 2 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans, dir­ectly and in­dir­ectly, for a com­bined $79 bil­lion in wages and be­ne­fits.

Beer ad­voc­ates have been fight­ing for years to de­crease the fed­er­al ex­cise tax on beer. In 1991, the fed­er­al beer tax was doubled from $9.00 to $18.00 per bar­rel as part of an ef­fort to bal­ance the fed­er­al budget. Taxes were also raised on se­lect lux­ury goods, but were even­tu­ally re­pealed or phased out. Now, beer ad­voc­ates want to roll back the fed­er­al beer tax to pre-1991 levels, ar­guing that it would cor­rect for years of over­tax­ing and bring back lost jobs.

Beer-in­dustry lob­by­ists ar­gue that the beer tax is un­fair, since it un­duly bur­dens the lower- and middle-in­come work­ers who prefer a cheap, cold brewski over a glass of single-malt whisky. “The tax on beer is thus one of the most dis­crim­in­at­ory of all taxes in the fed­er­al and states’ tax codes,” ac­cord­ing to the Beer In­sti­tute.

And Alabama isn’t the only state wrest­ling to ex­pand beer busi­ness and the eco­nom­ic be­ne­fits that come with it:

“¢ Min­nesota beer act­iv­ists are agit­at­ing to re­in­state Sunday sales.

“¢ New Hamp­shire law­makers may re­verse a state ban on ad­vert­ising al­co­hol on bill­boards, and could even vote to al­low res­taur­ants to sell beer to go.

“¢ Con­necti­c­ut may do away with ex­cise taxes on beer, wine, and li­quor, as the state has been los­ing busi­ness across the bor­der to Rhode Is­land, which has lower al­co­hol taxes.

“¢ An In­di­ana law­suit is chal­len­ging the state’s ban on selling re­fri­ger­ated beer in gas sta­tions, gro­cer­ies, and phar­ma­cies, though the law is un­likely to be over­turned.

Still, the fed­er­al beer tax isn’t likely to de­crease any time soon, as Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Sarah Mimms wrote last month:

The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice has ar­gued in fa­vor of rais­ing the ex­cise tax, not­ing that the costs of al­co­hol­ism and al­co­hol-re­lated in­cid­ents far ex­ceed the rev­en­ue brought in by taxes on beer, wine, and spir­its. “When ad­jus­ted for in­fla­tion, cur­rent ex­cise-tax rates on al­co­hol are far lower than his­tor­ic levels,” CBO ar­gues. “In the 1950s, ex­cise taxes ac­coun­ted for nearly half of the pretax price of al­co­hol; they now ac­count for between 10 and 20 per­cent of the pretax price.”

While beer ad­voc­ates may be fight­ing a quix­ot­ic battle, law­makers should re­cog­nize the eco­nom­ic good the craft brew­ing in­dustry can bring to their states — or just shut up and drink.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.