For Real Change, Beer Advocates Turn to the States

Across the country, states are advocating for crisp, thirst-quenching laws.

Samples of Lagunitas Brewing Company beers sit on a tray during a brewery tour at Lagunitas Brewing Company on February 21, 2014 in Petaluma, California.
National Journal
Emma Roller
March 12, 2014, 11:36 a.m.

State law­makers are look­ing to spur busi­ness wherever they can, but one in­dustry hopes to change loc­al pal­ates as well as loc­al eco­nom­ies: brew­er­ies.

While they haven’t had much luck in Wash­ing­ton, beer ad­voc­ates are hav­ing more suc­cess at the state level. Last year, Alabama be­came the last state to leg­al­ize home brew­ing. A bill wend­ing its way through the state Le­gis­lature this week would al­low lar­ger Alabama brew­ers to open res­taur­ants at their brew­er­ies. The only hitch: No brew­ery in Alabama is big enough to qual­i­fy for the law.

Alabama is work­ing to change that. The state is now try­ing to lure high-pro­file brew­er­ies from out of state, like Stone Brew­ing in Cali­for­nia. In 2012, Alabama ranked 49th in brew­er­ies per cap­ita. But with re­cent laws like the Alabama Brew­ery Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Act, which al­lows craft brew­ers to sell their wares where they’re brewed, Alabama is hop­ing to raise its pro­file as a des­tin­a­tion for brew­ers and beer afi­cion­ados alike.

Still, com­pared with oth­er booze, the beer in­dustry is strug­gling to keep its brand re­cog­ni­tion. Un­like years ago, more people today say they prefer drink­ing wine or li­quor in­stead of beer. Des­pite the re­l­at­ive de­cline of beer’s pop­ular­ity, there has been an ex­plo­sion of craft brew­er­ies around the coun­try — in 2012, the craft-brew­ing in­dustry saw 15 per­cent growth. Lar­ger main­stream products like Blue Moon and Pabst Blue Rib­bon are en­joy­ing rap­id growth. There are al­most 2,000 craft brew­er­ies in the U.S. There’s even a con­gres­sion­al Small Brew­ers Caucus.

And the beer in­dustry has eco­nom­ic ripple ef­fects. Ac­cord­ing to the Beer In­sti­tute, the in­dustry em­ploys roughly 2 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans, dir­ectly and in­dir­ectly, for a com­bined $79 bil­lion in wages and be­ne­fits.

Beer ad­voc­ates have been fight­ing for years to de­crease the fed­er­al ex­cise tax on beer. In 1991, the fed­er­al beer tax was doubled from $9.00 to $18.00 per bar­rel as part of an ef­fort to bal­ance the fed­er­al budget. Taxes were also raised on se­lect lux­ury goods, but were even­tu­ally re­pealed or phased out. Now, beer ad­voc­ates want to roll back the fed­er­al beer tax to pre-1991 levels, ar­guing that it would cor­rect for years of over­tax­ing and bring back lost jobs.

Beer-in­dustry lob­by­ists ar­gue that the beer tax is un­fair, since it un­duly bur­dens the lower- and middle-in­come work­ers who prefer a cheap, cold brewski over a glass of single-malt whisky. “The tax on beer is thus one of the most dis­crim­in­at­ory of all taxes in the fed­er­al and states’ tax codes,” ac­cord­ing to the Beer In­sti­tute.

And Alabama isn’t the only state wrest­ling to ex­pand beer busi­ness and the eco­nom­ic be­ne­fits that come with it:

“¢ Min­nesota beer act­iv­ists are agit­at­ing to re­in­state Sunday sales.

“¢ New Hamp­shire law­makers may re­verse a state ban on ad­vert­ising al­co­hol on bill­boards, and could even vote to al­low res­taur­ants to sell beer to go.

“¢ Con­necti­c­ut may do away with ex­cise taxes on beer, wine, and li­quor, as the state has been los­ing busi­ness across the bor­der to Rhode Is­land, which has lower al­co­hol taxes.

“¢ An In­di­ana law­suit is chal­len­ging the state’s ban on selling re­fri­ger­ated beer in gas sta­tions, gro­cer­ies, and phar­ma­cies, though the law is un­likely to be over­turned.

Still, the fed­er­al beer tax isn’t likely to de­crease any time soon, as Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Sarah Mimms wrote last month:

The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice has ar­gued in fa­vor of rais­ing the ex­cise tax, not­ing that the costs of al­co­hol­ism and al­co­hol-re­lated in­cid­ents far ex­ceed the rev­en­ue brought in by taxes on beer, wine, and spir­its. “When ad­jus­ted for in­fla­tion, cur­rent ex­cise-tax rates on al­co­hol are far lower than his­tor­ic levels,” CBO ar­gues. “In the 1950s, ex­cise taxes ac­coun­ted for nearly half of the pretax price of al­co­hol; they now ac­count for between 10 and 20 per­cent of the pretax price.”

While beer ad­voc­ates may be fight­ing a quix­ot­ic battle, law­makers should re­cog­nize the eco­nom­ic good the craft brew­ing in­dustry can bring to their states — or just shut up and drink.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
22 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×