House’s Most Conservative Members Soften Tone on Immigration

Acknowledging that reform won’t happen in 2014 has given Republicans a chance to appeal to Hispanic voters.

NEW YORK, NY - JANUARY 17: Immigrants celebrate after taking the oath of allegiance to the United States at a naturalization ceremony on January 17, 2014 in New York City. One hundred and fifty-three people from 41 countries became American citizens at the event.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
March 12, 2014, 10:23 a.m.

As the smell of Chick-fil-A sand­wiches cool­ing in the corner waf­ted over them, some of the House’s most con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers took an un­usu­ally soft tone on im­mig­ra­tion re­form on Wed­nes­day.

While ac­know­ledging at their monthly “Con­ver­sa­tions With Con­ser­vat­ives” event that little in the form of ac­tu­al le­gis­la­tion is likely to be done on the is­sue this year, sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ives im­pli­citly voiced their sup­port for al­low­ing those who were brought in­to the coun­try il­leg­ally as chil­dren, and for those who are will­ing to work hard, to so­lid­i­fy their status in the coun­try.

Rep. Joe Bar­ton, R-Texas, kicked off the dis­cus­sion by us­ing the L-word. “I think there is a middle ground. It’s not a cit­izen­ship path, but it is a leg­al­iz­a­tion path,” Bar­ton said, adding that “the over­whelm­ing ma­jor­ity of the His­pan­ics in Texas are either there be­cause they were born there or they’ve come there to work and they are work­ing and they’re pos­it­ive, pro­duct­ive cit­izens.”

Bar­ton went on to re­count a meet­ing he held in his dis­trict on Tues­day with a group of His­pan­ic-Amer­ic­ans, in­clud­ing a wo­man in her “mid-40s, maybe her early 50s,” he said, who was brought to the United States il­leg­ally by her par­ents when she was just four years old. “She’s worked hard, she’s paid her taxes, she’s a pro­duct­ive cit­izen. We’ve got to find a way as Re­pub­lic­ans to help that wo­man and her fam­ily keep her in this coun­try without be­ing per­petu­ally afraid that she’s go­ing to be de­por­ted,” Bar­ton said.

At the same time, con­ser­vat­ives ar­gued, noth­ing can be done for people like Bar­ton’s con­stitu­ent un­til the bor­der is se­cure. “I think you would be amazed at what we will agree to once the bor­der is se­cure,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, said em­phat­ic­ally Wed­nes­day.

The change in tone among con­ser­vat­ives comes weeks after House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship ad­mit­ted that des­pite put­ting out a series of im­mig­ra­tion-re­form prin­ciples, noth­ing will be done this year to act on them. At the same time, this is an elec­tion year and Re­pub­lic­ans openly ac­know­ledge the need to ap­peal to His­pan­ic voters. “There’s so much we can do to show the His­pan­ic com­munity that we value them if they value the Amer­ic­an value sys­tem.”¦ We just can­not turn our back on that con­stitu­ency or that is­sue. But at the same time, we can’t just open the bor­der and say come on in,” Bar­ton said.

An­oth­er fel­low Tex­an, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, ad­ded: “Un­less you get bor­der se­cur­ity right, I’m not sure any oth­er thing counts and how can you count on this ad­min­is­tra­tion to get bor­der se­cur­ity right?”

The ex­cuse that Obama, who has in­creas­ingly re­lied on ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion to skirt around Con­gress, can­not be trus­ted to en­force new and ex­ist­ing im­mig­ra­tion laws has opened up Re­pub­lic­ans to soften their tone on the is­sue. Their hope is that show­ing com­pas­sion coupled with the in­sist­ence that they would act, if not for an in­ef­fect­ive pres­id­ent, will help to at­tract His­pan­ic voters in 2014, of­fer­ing a change in rhet­or­ic, but little in the way of ac­tion.

Hensarling summed up the tac­tic on Wed­nes­day. “I’ve got lots of com­pas­sion for people who are com­ing in­to this coun­try and are just try­ing to feed their kids, I get that. I mean if I was in that po­s­i­tion, you couldn’t make the razor wire sharp enough or the wall high enough, I get that. But at the same time you can­not ex­cuse those whose first act is to break the law,” Hensarling said.

But what to ac­tu­ally do with those who entered the coun­try il­leg­ally is an is­sue that Re­pub­lic­ans are leav­ing for an­oth­er day. Part of the is­sue is that the party wants to fo­cus the midterm elec­tions on the fail­ures of the Af­ford­able Care Act, rather than open them­selves up for at­tack on a new and con­ten­tious is­sue.

But that strategy could back­fire, warned Rep. Raul Lab­rador, R-Idaho, who has been a lead­er in the House Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence on im­mig­ra­tion re­form. “I think we need to have a pos­it­ive agenda for Amer­ica. We need to talk about the four, five, six is­sues that we stand for. If we only talk about Obama­care, we’re go­ing to have the same res­ult that we had in 2012, which is a lot of ex­cite­ment and a lot of people on the night of the elec­tion think­ing that we’re go­ing to win the elec­tion and be­ing very dis­ap­poin­ted the next morn­ing,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
AT ISSUE: VENEZUELA SANCTIONS
Deal Struck to Confirm Ambassador to Mexico
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The United States is finally about to get an ambassador to Mexico. Senate Republicans who have been negotiating a way to confirm Roberta Jacobson as the nation’s top diplomat to Mexico have reached the contours of an agreement that would allow Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)—Jacobson’s chief obstacle—to secure renewed sanctions against Venezuela in exchange for lifting his objections."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Much Is Cleveland Paying for ‘Protest Insurance’ for the GOP Convention?
3 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Ten million dollars, plus another $1.5 million for the broker who will "develop and obtain" the policy. The concern: mass protests could lead to mass arrests, which could then lead to civil rights claims against the city.

Source:
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×