From Despair to Hope Again: A Job-Market Tale

When you look past the splashy headlines, the new jobs report shows the same slow growth.

People visit booths of prospective employers during the Hiring Our Heroes job fair at the Washington Convention Center, on January 10, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
See more stories about...
Catherine Hollander
March 7, 2014, 5:22 a.m.

The press loves to hype the fickle monthly jobs re­port. The past few months have shown the wild swings of emo­tion it can eli­cit as the head­line num­bers show signs of strength, then weak­ness, then strength again.

This Fri­day, the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics re­por­ted that the eco­nomy ad­ded 175,000 jobs in Feb­ru­ary, best­ing eco­nom­ists’ ex­pect­a­tions of a roughly 150,000 payroll gain. Many had warned of down­side risks, giv­en Feb­ru­ary’s bad weath­er — which hit dur­ing the peri­od BLS con­ducts its em­ploy­ment sur­veys — and two weak labor-mar­ket re­ports re­leased earli­er in the week. At 8:30 a.m. Fri­day, it was as if Aunt Mil­dred, who had brought her fam­ous ham cas­ser­ole to the past few fam­ily gath­er­ings, sud­denly showed up with Ben & Jerry’s. Time to cel­eb­rate?

Let’s re­wind a minute: Back at the end of 2013, eco­nom­ists were etch­ing out their fore­casts for this year and see­ing rain­bows (such as there can be in the postre­ces­sion era) on the ho­ri­zon. Then, along came Old Man Winter, spoil­ing the party. Crummy jobs re­ports in Decem­ber and Janu­ary were blamed on severe weath­er, but they also raised ques­tions about wheth­er that un­der­ly­ing mo­mentum every­one had pre­dicted go­ing in­to 2014 was really there.

It was — and is — tough to tell. Teas­ing the pre­cise weath­er ef­fects out of the re­port is a dif­fi­cult task. Just ask BLS, which says so ex­pli­citly: “It is not pos­sible to quanti­fy the ef­fect of ex­treme weath­er on es­tim­ates of over-the-month change in em­ploy­ment,” the new re­port says. “What we need to do and will be do­ing in the weeks ahead is to try to get a firmer handle on ex­actly how much of that set of soft data can be ex­plained by weath­er,” Janet Yel­len, the Fed­er­al Re­serve chair, said at a re­cent hear­ing.

Now, some eco­nom­ists are point­ing to Fri­day’s re­port as evid­ence that the poor per­form­ance of the past few months was the res­ult of the weath­er after all, and the eco­nomy is due for a pay­back. “If the eco­nomy man­aged to gen­er­ate 175,000 new jobs in a month when the weath­er was so severe, once the weath­er re­turns to sea­son­al norms payrolls em­ploy­ment growth is likely to ac­cel­er­ate fur­ther,” Paul Dales, seni­or U.S. eco­nom­ist at mac­roe­co­nom­ic re­search firm Cap­it­al Eco­nom­ics, wrote to cli­ents.

The volat­ile head­line swings, as they change the nar­rat­ive, mask the slow, steady pace of growth all along. Monthly em­ploy­ment gains av­er­aged 174,000 in 2011, 186,000 in 2012, and 194,000 in 2013. The Feb­ru­ary num­bers are “slightly high­er than what fore­casters were ex­pect­ing, but for the Amer­ic­an work­force, this is not good news at all — at this pace, it will take more than five years to get back to prere­ces­sion labor-mar­ket con­di­tions,” Heidi Shi­er­holz, an eco­nom­ist at the lib­er­al Eco­nom­ic Policy In­sti­tute, said in a state­ment.

They also mask the de­press­ing un­der­ly­ing data points. A con­stel­la­tion of gloomy news lurked be­low the 175,000 gain: Teen un­em­ploy­ment climbed by 0.7 per­cent­age points to 21.4 per­cent in Feb­ru­ary. Black un­em­ploy­ment, at 12 per­cent, re­mains well above the na­tion­al rate of 6.7 per­cent. The ranks of the long-term un­em­ployed — those out of a job for 27 weeks or more — swelled by 203,000 to 3.8 mil­lion, even as their num­bers fell by 901,000 over the year.

Also note­worthy: The length of the av­er­age work­week edged down by 0.1 hour, maybe due to the bad weath­er. We’ll have to wait un­til next month to test that hy­po­thes­is. But the over­all story re­mains one of slow growth, one that the up! down! all around! head­line num­bers tends to hide.

What We're Following See More »
Hillary Clinton Accepts the Democratic Nomination for President
7 hours ago

"It is with humility, determination, and boundless confidence in America’s promise that I accept your nomination for president," said Hillary Clinton in becoming the first woman to accept a nomination for president from a major party. Clinton gave a wide-ranging address, both criticizing Donald Trump and speaking of what she has done in the past and hopes to do in the future. "He's taken the Republican party a long way, from morning in America to midnight in America," Clinton said of Trump. However, most of her speech focused instead on the work she has done and the work she hopes to do as president. "I will be a president of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. For the struggling, the striving, the successful," she said. "For those who vote for me and for those who don't. For all Americans together."

Protesters Make Good on Threat to Disrupt Speech
7 hours ago

Supporters of Bernie Sanders promised to walk out, turn their backs, or disrupt Hillary Clinton's speech tonight, and they made good immediately, with an outburst almost as soon as Clinton began her speech. But her supporters, armed with a handy counter-chant cheat sheet distributed by the campaign, immediately began drowning them out with chants of "Hillary, Hillary!"

New Survey Shows Clinton Up 9 in Pennsylvania
16 hours ago

If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."

Democrats Beat Republicans in Convention Ratings So Far
16 hours ago

Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."

Catholics, Highly Educated Moving Toward Dems
20 hours ago

Catholics who attend mass at least weekly have increased their support of the Democratic nominee by 22 points, relative to 2012, when devout Catholics backed Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, a Morning Consult poll shows that those voters with advanced degrees prefer Hillary Clinton, 51%-34%. Which, we suppose, makes the ideal Clinton voter a Catholic with a PhD in divinity.