Senate Democrats Like Obama’s Budget”“but Not Enough to Act on It

Republicans were even more harsh, calling it “a campaign brochure.”

Copies of the Obama Administration's proposed budget are seen at the Senate Budget Committee hearing room March 4, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Michael Catalini Billy House
March 4, 2014, 7:05 a.m.

Sen­ate Demo­crats are of­fer­ing an awk­ward em­brace of Pres­id­ent Obama’s fisc­al 2015 budget, cast­ing it as a “blue­print” for fu­ture spend­ing habits, with the know­ledge that the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plan is little more than an aca­dem­ic ex­er­cise.

The pres­id­ent’s budget hits at a time when there’s al­most no chance that Con­gress will act on it, after law­makers passed a hard-won two-year spend­ing plan earli­er this year that amounts to a polit­ic­al armistice — for now — over fisc­al fights.

The Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity is now walk­ing a polit­ic­al tightrope, sup­port­ive of the pres­id­ent’s policies but care­ful to sig­nal that they’re not re­open­ing the budget deal.

“While the Amer­ic­an people have a budget in place and the cer­tainty they de­serve that there won’t be an­oth­er budget crisis through the end of 2015, we in Con­gress owe it to them to work to­geth­er to build on that bi­par­tis­an found­a­tion,” Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray said in a state­ment.

Re­pub­lic­ans were much harder on the plan. “This budget isn’t a ser­i­ous doc­u­ment,” said House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an, who ne­go­ti­ated the budget deal with Mur­ray. “It’s a cam­paign bro­chure.”

Mur­ray had said late last week that be­cause of the two-year deal, the Sen­ate would not take up the pres­id­ent’s budget. In­stead, Demo­crats are fo­cus­ing their agenda on eco­nom­ic is­sues, push­ing for an ex­ten­sion of un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance, a hike in the min­im­um wage, and a meas­ure that would re­quire equal pay for equal work by men and wo­men.

Mur­ray praised the pres­id­ent’s pro­posed ex­pan­sion of the Earned In­come Tax Cred­it and ap­plauded the White House for aim­ing to raise rev­en­ue by clos­ing tax loop­holes.

“The two-year bi­par­tis­an budget deal signed in­to law in Decem­ber was a strong step in the right dir­ec­tion, but it shouldn’t be the last step we take,” Mur­ray said.

Speak­er John Boehner said the pro­pos­al was per­haps Obama’s “most ir­re­spons­ible budget yet.”

He com­plained that, even though Obama signed the budget deal, the pres­id­ent now pro­poses vi­ol­at­ing that agree­ment with ad­di­tion­al spend­ing. Moreover, Boehner said, Obama pro­poses rais­ing taxes, not to re­duce the de­fi­cit but to spend more tax­pay­er money.

“Spend­ing too much, bor­row­ing too much, and tax­ing too much — it would hurt our eco­nomy and cost jobs,” Boehner said in a state­ment. “And it of­fers no solu­tions to save the safety net and re­tire­ment-se­cur­ity pro­grams that are crit­ic­al to mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans but are also driv­ing our fisc­al im­bal­ance.”

The speak­er said Re­pub­lic­ans will of­fer their own fisc­al 2015 budget in com­ing weeks.

But Rep. Chris Van Hol­len, the top Demo­crat on the House Budget Com­mit­tee, ap­plauded the pres­id­ent’s budget. He said it calls for a clos­ing of “spe­cial-in­terest tax breaks” and mak­ing in­vest­ments in edu­ca­tion, sci­entif­ic re­search, man­u­fac­tur­ing, and in­fra­struc­ture. The pro­pos­als, coupled with an in­crease in the min­im­um wage, said Van Hol­len, “will help put Amer­ic­ans back to work and grow the middle class.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×