Paul Ryan Says Some Poverty Programs Are Hurting the Poor

 House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) questions Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf during a hearing in the Cannon House Office Building on Capitol Hill February 5, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
March 3, 2014, 6:26 a.m.

As Pres­id­ent Obama and con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats make their fight for eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity a re­pet­it­ive theme in this midterm elec­tion year, House Re­pub­lic­ans led by Budget Com­mit­tee Paul Ry­an want to re­define what “com­pas­sion­ate” aid for the poor should mean.

The 2012 GOP vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee re­leased a re­port Monday that he says “takes stock” of the gov­ern­ment’s dec­ades-old web of an­ti­poverty ef­forts — launch­ing what is to be a House Re­pub­lic­an fisc­al mes­saging fo­cus this year on re­form­ing wel­fare and so­cial pro­grams.

Titled ” The War on Poverty: 50 Years Later,” the Budget Com­mit­tee re­port comes a day be­fore Pres­id­ent Obama’s sched­uled re­lease of his fisc­al 2015 spend­ing plan. It also ar­rives just be­fore Obama heads to Con­necti­c­ut on Wed­nes­day for a con­fer­ence with Demo­crat­ic gov­ernors to pro­mote a min­im­um-wage hike, and dur­ing a time when the pres­id­ent and Demo­crats have been call­ing for an ex­ten­sion of long-term-un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits. Obama also has said he wants to ex­pand Head Start, an early-edu­ca­tion pro­gram for low-in­come chil­dren.

For Re­pub­lic­ans, push­ing the poverty de­bate in a dif­fer­ent dir­ec­tion could be risky. It might help en­er­gize a GOP base. But it also could put off mod­er­ate and in­de­pend­ent voters if they see these ef­forts as a mean-spir­ited off­shoot of party ex­trem­ists push­ing their agenda. Ry­an seems not to worry so much about the lat­ter pro­spect.

“Fifty years ago, Pres­id­ent Lyn­don John­son de­clared war on poverty. Today, in the af­ter­math of the Great Re­ces­sion, we are once again de­bat­ing the best way to help the least among us,” states the be­gin­ning of his com­mit­tee re­port.

“Clearly, we can do bet­ter. We can re­work these fed­er­al pro­grams and help fam­il­ies in need lead lives of dig­nity,” said Ry­an, in a sep­ar­ate state­ment ac­com­pa­ny­ing the 204-page re­port. “For too long, we have meas­ured com­pas­sion by how much we spend in­stead of how many people get out of poverty.”

House Re­pub­lic­ans say they will re­lease their own budget later this spring.

Ry­an’s re­port Monday provides a hint of what that budget might con­tain. The up­shot is that the gov­ern­ment spent $799 bil­lion in 2012 on some 92 an­ti­poverty pro­grams. It says these pro­grams form a “du­plic­at­ive” and com­plex web that is both dif­fi­cult to nav­ig­ate, and even form “poverty traps.”

In all, the re­port dis­cusses eight areas of fed­er­al policy: cash aid; edu­ca­tion and job train­ing; en­ergy; food aid; health care; hous­ing; so­cial ser­vices; and vet­er­ans af­fairs.

Des­pite these ef­forts, the re­port says, poverty (though there are a num­ber of ways to meas­ure that) is wide­spread. The re­port states that in 1965, the poverty rate was 17.3 per­cent, while in 2012, it was 15 per­cent.

“Over the past three years, ‘deep poverty’ has reached the highest level on re­cord,” the doc­u­ment states, adding that “about 21.8 per­cent of chil­dren live be­low the poverty line.”

The re­port says the biggest cause of poverty is broken fam­il­ies.

“For all fam­il­ies, the poverty rate was 13.1 per­cent. But 34.2 per­cent of fam­il­ies headed by a single fe­male were con­sidered be­low poverty, and 22.8 per­cent of house­holds com­posed of un­re­lated in­di­vidu­als were con­sidered to be in poverty.”

The re­port also claims that many of these an­ti­poverty pro­grams ac­tu­ally cre­ate a “poverty trap.” Be­cause they are gen­er­ally means-tested — in which be­ne­fits de­cline as re­cip­i­ents make more money — poor fam­il­ies face very high im­pli­cit mar­gin­al tax rates, it states.

“The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment ef­fect­ively dis­cour­ages them from mak­ing more money,” the re­port says.

The re­port also takes a swipe at Head Start, an early-edu­ca­tion pro­gram it states is “fail­ing to pre­pare chil­dren for school.” And it says Medi­caid, which provides health care for low-in­come fam­il­ies, “in­creases the like­li­hood of re­ceiv­ing wel­fare be­ne­fits.”

For their part, Demo­crats said they were un­im­pressed — and their re­sponse Monday un­der­scored the risk Ry­an and Re­pub­lic­ans might be tak­ing.

The Budget Com­mit­tee’s top Demo­crat, Chris Van Hol­len, noted that Ry­an did not reach across the polit­ic­al aisle to help come up with a bi­par­tis­an re­port. And he and oth­er Demo­crats made sure to sug­gest that the re­port’s tone was re­min­is­cent of the in­fam­ous com­ment made by Ry­an’s pres­id­en­tial run­ning mate, Mitt Rom­ney, that sug­ges­ted as much as 47 per­cent of the na­tion is de­pend­ent on the gov­ern­ment.

“The GOP has nev­er really giv­en up on Mitt Rom­ney’s at­tack on the 47 per­cent,” said Van Hol­len.

“Wheth­er it’s say­ing that 47 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans are takers, or claim­ing that the so­cial safety net is dis­cour­aging people from mak­ing more money, Re­pub­lic­ans just don’t get it,” ad­ded Mi­chael Czin, a spokes­man for the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee. “Their plan is to block a min­im­um-wage in­crease, cut ac­cess to high­er edu­ca­tion, slash early-child­hood pro­grams, voucher­ize Medi­care, and shred the so­cial safety net — a safety net that lif­ted 45 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans out of poverty in 2012 alone.”

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
2 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×