The Few. The Proud. The Reading Material.

Female Marine Corps recruits go through close combat training at the United States Marine Corps recruit depot June 23, 2004 in Parris Island, South Carolina. Marine Corps boot camp, with its combination of strict discipline and exhaustive physical training, is considered the most rigorous of the armed forces recruit training. Congress is currently considering bills that could increase the size of the Marine Corps and the Army to help meet US military demands in Iraq and Afghanistan.
National Journal
Billy House
Feb. 12, 2014, 11:37 a.m.

A House Re­pub­lic­an is seek­ing a hear­ing in­to the Mar­ine Corps’ de­cision to move the Mar­ine Corps Times off prom­in­ent news­tands at the front of base com­mis­sar­ies and ex­changes, call­ing it “a blatant at­tempt to pun­ish” the pub­lic­a­tion for art­icles crit­ic­al of Corps Com­mand­ant Gen. Jim Amos.

Rep. Wal­ter Jones of North Car­o­lina sent a let­ter Monday blast­ing the Corps’ ac­tion as a “rep­re­hens­ible” ef­fort to make the in­de­pend­ent pub­lic­a­tion more dif­fi­cult to find. Jones sent the let­ter to House Armed Ser­vices Mil­it­ary Per­son­nel Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Joe Wilson and rank­ing mem­ber Susan Dav­is.

On Wed­nes­day, two days after Jones’s let­ter was sent, the Mar­ine Corps an­nounced it is pla­cing the Gan­nett pub­lic­a­tion back on its usu­al news­tands — at least tem­por­ar­ily.

But Jones, him­self a mem­ber of the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, said later on Wed­nes­day he still wants a hear­ing to look in­to the mat­ter.

“In Amer­ica, a free and open press is crit­ic­al to demo­cracy,” Jones wrote in Monday’s let­ter. “If you start to con­trol what our ser­vice mem­bers read, then we, as a na­tion, have a crit­ic­al prob­lem.”

A state­ment on the ser­vice’s of­fi­cial Face­book page ex­plained the re­versal Wed­nes­day: “Re­ac­tion to the Mar­ine Corps Times’ re­lo­ca­tion demon­strated a clear mis­un­der­stand­ing of in­tent; there­fore, the product will re­turn to its ori­gin­al loc­a­tion pending the out­come and com­mu­nic­a­tion of a more com­pre­hens­ive, pur­pose­ful plan based on our Com­mand­ant’s in­tent as it relates to an em­phas­is on pro­fes­sion­al­ism with­in our Corps.”

But a state­ment from Jones’s of­fice says that “While Con­gress­man Jones wel­comes this de­cision, he re­mains troubled that Mar­ine Corps lead­er­ship has im­plied an in­tent to again re­move the pub­lic­a­tion from its prom­in­ent store loc­a­tion in the fu­ture to cre­ate room for ‘health­i­er food and bever­age choices’ and ‘mil­it­ary lit­er­at­ure from the Com­mand­ant’s Read­ing List.’ “

“This at­tempt by the Mar­ine Corps lead­er­ship to stand in the way of a free and open press is un­ac­cept­able,” Jones said in a state­ment Wed­nes­day. “The Mar­ine Corps Times is a widely read pub­lic­a­tion among mem­bers of our armed forces, as it provides them with crit­ic­al in­form­a­tion re­lated to vari­ous as­pects of their em­ploy­ment and ser­vice to our coun­try.”

Jones has writ­ten a let­ter to the Corps’ deputy com­mand­ant for man­power and re­serve af­fairs, Lt. Gen. Robert E. Mil­stead, re­quest­ing fur­ther de­tails re­gard­ing the ini­tial de­cision to re­lo­cate pub­lic­a­tion with­in the ser­vice’s stores.

In its own story about the de­cision to re­lo­cate its place with base stores and com­mis­sar­ies, the Mar­ine Corps Times on Sunday in­cluded a com­ment from Peter Lun­dquist, the Mil­it­ary Times’ vice pres­id­ent and gen­er­al man­ager.

“For any re­tail­er to hide one of its best-selling products is just bad busi­ness. It ob­vi­ously will hurt our news­stand sales, but it also hurts rev­en­ues to the Ex­change,” Lun­dquist said. “But I’m told this isn’t about busi­ness. Mar­ine Corps Times helps Mar­ines and their fam­il­ies stay in­formed about their ser­vice and their live­li­hood. We be­lieve our in­de­pend­ence is an as­set to Mar­ines.”

“By what stand­ard is Mar­ine Corps Times not pro­fes­sion­ally ori­ented read­ing ma­ter­i­al, and who is set­ting that stand­ard for Mar­ines?” Lun­dquist asked.

The pa­per also noted that throughout much of the past year, it has pub­lished dozens of art­icles as part of an on­go­ing in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to al­leg­a­tions that the ser­vice’s com­mand­ant, Amos, ab­used his au­thor­ity to en­sure Mar­ines were pun­ished for an em­bar­rass­ing war-zone scan­dal.

“Nu­mer­ous re­ports have cap­tured the at­ten­tion of main­stream me­dia out­lets, in­clud­ing NPR, CNN, and Time magazine, among sev­er­al oth­ers,” the pa­per noted.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×