Yes, Things in Sochi Are Bad — But Olympics Are Usually Terrible for Host Cities

When is it ever worth hosting the games?

Snowflakes transform into four Olympic rings with one failing to form during the Opening Ceremony of the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics at Fisht Olympic Stadium on February 7, 2014 in Sochi, Russia.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi
Feb. 7, 2014, 8:18 a.m.

The state of af­fairs sure does stink (fig­ur­at­ively and lit­er­ally) in So­chi, eh? Journ­al­ists have been doc­u­ment­ing everything from stray dogs to brown drink­ing wa­ter in the city host­ing the Winter Olympics, even after Rus­sia poured some $51 bil­lion in­to get­ting ready to host the games, mak­ing it the most ex­pens­ive in his­tory. Come on Rus­sia, get it to­geth­er, right?

Well, keep in mind the scourge the Olympics brings upon the host cit­ies them­selves — such that it’s a won­der any place would ac­tu­ally want them.

Many na­tions vie to host the games for the per­ceived eco­nom­ic and geo­pol­it­ic­al be­ne­fits. Noth­ing like the world send­ing you its best ath­letes in tra­di­tion­al garb to make you look like you’re su­per-im­port­ant (way to show com­mit­ment to those shorts, Ber­muda). And then think of all that money com­ing from tour­ists and in­vestors!

But eco­nom­ic stud­ies show a mixed bag. Some places, such as Bar­celona, may have ended up with a long-term be­ne­fit. But look oth­er sites, such as Athens; the Greeks shelled out $15 bil­lion, con­trib­ut­ing to the na­tion’s crip­pling debt, and ended up with bunch of aban­doned sports com­plexes to show for it. The Beijing games cost $40 bil­lion, and tour­ism book­ings ac­tu­ally went down dur­ing the sum­mer of 2008. The air pol­lu­tion levels that Chinese of­fi­cials had com­mit­ted to lower­ing dur­ing the games re­boun­ded when the events ended.

Rus­si­an of­fi­cials in­sist they will be bet­ter off in the long run. But oth­ers in the na­tion ar­gue that the re­sources could have been bet­ter spent. “If all that as­tro­nom­ic­al amount of money — as­tro­nom­ic­al even for Rus­sia — had been in­ves­ted in the im­prove­ment of util­it­ies and ser­vices, it would have giv­en a strong push to eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment,” Vadim Bit-Av­ragim, who helps man­age about $4.3 bil­lion at Kapit­al As­set Man­age­ment in Mo­scow, told Bloomberg.

Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin is bank­ing on So­chi be­com­ing a re­sort and des­tin­a­tion city in the af­ter­math of the Olympics. But rat­ings firm Moody’s pre­dicts that un­cer­tainty about the long-term be­ne­fits for So­chi over­shad­ow any po­ten­tial gains, which, by the way, will have to come from the hotel sec­tor since that’s where most of the private in­vest­ment went.

“It de­pends on the Rus­si­an gov­ern­ment’s ef­forts to at­tract new tour­ists to So­chi, which we es­tim­ate need to in­crease by 2.5 or three times after the Olympics to en­sure that the ma­jor­ity of the ho­tels are full,” a Moody’s ana­lyst told Re­u­ters.

Giv­en that most of the press that So­chi’s ho­tels have re­ceived has fo­cused on doorknobs fall­ing off and blame for Bob Cos­t­as’s eye in­fec­tion, it’s tough to fore­see tour­ists, Rus­si­an and oth­er­wise, flock­ing to their of­fer­ings.

Ask­ing for the world’s spot­light can be a great mar­ket­ing cam­paign. Oth­er host cit­ies were already in­ter­na­tion­al des­tin­a­tions. Not so for So­chi, or for Rus­sia as a whole. Tour­ism ac­counts for only 1.5 per­cent of the na­tion’s eco­nomy, and Rus­si­ans tend to go abroad for va­ca­tion.

But that spot­light can shine bright­est on the ugli­est spots, which is how things are play­ing out in So­chi. And, prob­ably, for most fu­ture Olympic des­tin­a­tions. 

So while we all mock So­chi’s in­ab­il­ity to be an ad­equate host, re­mem­ber that when the journ­al­ists and ath­letes de­part, they’re leav­ing be­hind a city that may very well be worse off for the en­tire ex­per­i­ence.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4717) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×