The Time Michael Grimm Yelled at Me

Even before that New Yorker story came out, I had a good sense of Grimm’s temper.

National Journal
Marin Cogan
Jan. 29, 2014, 6:48 a.m.

Late Tues­day, Rep. Mi­chael Grimm capped off a night usu­ally re­served for ce­re­mo­ni­al pomp and de­cor­um by threat­en­ing to throw a re­port­er off a bal­cony. “Let me be clear to you, if you ever do that to me again, I’ll throw you off this f——— bal­cony,” Grimm told NY1 re­port­er Mi­chael Scotto, who dared to ask the con­gress­man about an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to his cam­paign fin­ances. “I’ll break you in half,” he ad­ded, “like a boy.”

Those who are fa­mil­i­ar with the Staten Is­land Re­pub­lic­an’s ca­reer are al­lowed to be shocked, but they shouldn’t be sur­prised. The world first learned that Grimm—who was elec­ted in 2010 on the strength of his ex­per­i­ence as an un­der­cov­er FBI agent on Wall Street—might not be the most level-headed guy when he ap­peared in a 2011 New York­er story by Evan Rat­liff. The story was about a man named Josef von Habs­burg, a con­fid­en­tial in­form­ant and scam artist who worked with Grimm when he was with the FBI. The story con­tained a dis­turb­ing scene in which Grimm is al­leged to have wiel­ded a gun at a Queens nightclub in 1999. Ac­cord­ing to the story, Grimm showed up at the club with a wo­man and had a con­front­a­tion with her es­tranged hus­band. Rat­liff picks up the story from here:

Around 2:30 A.M., there was a com­mo­tion on the dance floor. Ac­cord­ing to [off-duty NYPD of­ficer Gor­don] Wil­li­ams, some­body was shout­ing, “He’s got a gun!” Fol­low­ing a crowd in­to the club’s gar­age, Wil­li­ams dis­covered that Grimm and the hus­band had re­turned, and Grimm was hold­ing a weapon. Grimm was “car­ry­ing on like a mad­man,” Wil­li­ams said. “He’s scream­ing, ‘I’m gonna fuckin’ kill him.’ So I said to him, ‘Who are you?’ He put the gun back in his waist and said, ‘I’m a fuck­ing F.B.I. agent, ain’t nobody gonna threaten me.’ “

Grimm denied mak­ing those threats. But the story goes on:

Grimm left the club, but at 4 A.M., just be­fore the club closed, he re­turned again, ac­cord­ing to Wil­li­ams, this time with an­oth­er F.B.I. agent and a group of N.Y.P.D. of­ficers. Grimm had told the po­lice that he had been as­saul­ted by the es­tranged hus­band and his friends. Wil­li­ams said that Grimm took com­mand of the scene, and re­fused to let the re­main­ing pat­rons and em­ploy­ees leave. “Every­body get up against the fuck­ing wall,” Wil­li­ams re­called him say­ing. “The F.B.I. is in con­trol.” Then Grimm, who ap­par­ently wanted to find the man with whom he’d had the ori­gin­al al­ter­ca­tion, said something that Wil­li­ams said he’ll nev­er for­get: “All the white people get out of here.”

You should really read Rat­liff’s en­tire story, as well as his fol­low-up posts ex­plain­ing what Grimm denies and how Rat­liff sourced the story, to get a full un­der­stand­ing of the con­text of the claims. Rat­liff also goes on to de­tail some of the more re­cent cam­paign fin­ance is­sues Grimm is fa­cing, in­clud­ing al­leg­a­tions that he and a New York rabbi, now un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion for al­legedly em­bezz­ling mil­lions from his con­greg­a­tion, col­lec­ted dona­tions that far ex­ceeded cam­paign fin­ance lim­its on in­di­vidu­al giv­ing. (That rabbi later pleaded guilty to visa fraud.) Earli­er this month, the FBI ar­res­ted a former fun­draiser for Grimm, al­leging she funneled $10,000 worth of il­leg­al dona­tions to his cam­paign.

Even be­fore that New York­er story came out, I had a good sense of Grimm’s tem­per. In March 2011, he was part of the fresh­man class I covered as a re­port­er for Politico, and I wrote a story about him cri­ti­ciz­ing fel­low con­ser­vat­ives for risk­ing a gov­ern­ment shut­down. “I don’t rep­res­ent the tea party or any­body like that, I rep­res­ent Staten Is­land and Brook­lyn. If we’re go­ing to make those cuts they’re go­ing to be smart,” he told me at the time. The tea party did not ap­pre­ci­ate that state­ment. So Grimm’s press sec­ret­ary called me back to in­sist he’d said “I don’t rep­res­ent only the tea party” and that I needed to is­sue a cor­rec­tion. I checked my notes, con­firmed my quote, and told them I was sorry but I couldn’t is­sue a cor­rec­tion. At the time it seemed like a mat­ter of prin­ciple: I wasn’t go­ing to is­sue a cor­rec­tion just be­cause someone was ex­per­i­en­cing a bit of con­tro­versy over his words. And that’s when Grimm got on the phone and star­ted shout­ing at me.

It’s been a few years since this happened, and I don’t re­mem­ber all of the de­tails. I do re­mem­ber him re­peatedly yelling that he “did not serve 10 years in the FBI!” to have to put up with something like this. To be clear, at no time did I feel threatened, nor did I feel par­tic­u­larly scared or up­set—al­though that seemed pretty clearly to me to be what he was try­ing to ac­com­plish. I was a little shocked, but I gave as good as I got, and he took it to my ed­it­or, and we even­tu­ally settled on this blog post where he got to cla­ri­fy his claims. Com­pared to last night’s out­burst, it was pretty tame. Still, I’ve nev­er dealt with any­one so angry be­fore, or since.

I’ve seen some people on Twit­ter this morn­ing sug­gest that the out­rage over Grimm’s out­burst is over­blown. Polit­ics ain’t bean­bag, and if you want to be in­volved in it you should learn to toughen up. Fair enough. But put­ting aside the an­noy­ing double stand­ard with which we treat emo­tion­al out­bursts on the job (cry­ing at work is seen as un­ac­cept­ably shame­ful, even though that dis­play of emo­tion is in­wardly dir­ec­ted and harms no one, where­as an­ger, which ac­tu­ally can harm people, is of­ten ra­tion­al­ized as a dis­play of pas­sion or in­tens­ity) Scotto was ask­ing Grimm, a pub­lic of­fi­cial, about a ser­i­ous and im­port­ant is­sue. Do we really want a polit­ic­al cul­ture in which journ­al­ists can’t ask pub­lic of­fi­cials le­git­im­ate ques­tions without get­ting brow­beaten?

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4694) }}

What We're Following See More »
FRENCH IS A LAWYER, VETERAN
Kristol Recruiting National Review’s David French for Third-Party Run
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Two Republicans intimately familiar with Bill Kristol’s efforts to recruit an independent presidential candidate to challenge Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have told Bloomberg Politics that the person Kristol has in mind is David French -- whose name the editor of the Weekly Standard floated in the current issue of the magazine.

French is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to the website of National Review, where French is a staff writer, he is a constitutional lawyer, a recipient of the Bronze Star, and an author of several books who lives in Columbia, Tenn., with his wife Nancy and three children."

Source:
CALIFORNIA VOTES IN A WEEK
Jerry Brown Backs Clinton
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

California Gov. Jerry Brown endorsed Hillary Clinton today, calling her "the only path forward to win the presidency and stop the dangerous candidacy of Donald Trump." While praising Sen. Bernie Sanders' campaign, Brown said "Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown – by millions of votes – that they want her as their nominee. ... This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun."

Source:
GLASS CEILING STILL HARD TO CRACK
Clinton Says Voters Still Hung Up on Gender
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a New York Magazine profile, Hillary Clinton said she still encounters misogyny at her own events: “‘I really admire you, I really like you, I just don’t know if I can vote for a woman to be president.’ I mean, they come to my events and then they say that to me.”

Source:
CHANGE WE CAN’T BELIEVE IN
Trump Vows Not to Change
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
Source:
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

×