The Time Michael Grimm Yelled at Me

Even before that New Yorker story came out, I had a good sense of Grimm’s temper.

National Journal
Marin Cogan
Jan. 29, 2014, 6:48 a.m.

Late Tues­day, Rep. Mi­chael Grimm capped off a night usu­ally re­served for ce­re­mo­ni­al pomp and de­cor­um by threat­en­ing to throw a re­port­er off a bal­cony. “Let me be clear to you, if you ever do that to me again, I’ll throw you off this f——— bal­cony,” Grimm told NY1 re­port­er Mi­chael Scotto, who dared to ask the con­gress­man about an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to his cam­paign fin­ances. “I’ll break you in half,” he ad­ded, “like a boy.”

Those who are fa­mil­i­ar with the Staten Is­land Re­pub­lic­an’s ca­reer are al­lowed to be shocked, but they shouldn’t be sur­prised. The world first learned that Grimm—who was elec­ted in 2010 on the strength of his ex­per­i­ence as an un­der­cov­er FBI agent on Wall Street—might not be the most level-headed guy when he ap­peared in a 2011 New York­er story by Evan Rat­liff. The story was about a man named Josef von Habs­burg, a con­fid­en­tial in­form­ant and scam artist who worked with Grimm when he was with the FBI. The story con­tained a dis­turb­ing scene in which Grimm is al­leged to have wiel­ded a gun at a Queens nightclub in 1999. Ac­cord­ing to the story, Grimm showed up at the club with a wo­man and had a con­front­a­tion with her es­tranged hus­band. Rat­liff picks up the story from here:

Around 2:30 A.M., there was a com­mo­tion on the dance floor. Ac­cord­ing to [off-duty NYPD of­ficer Gor­don] Wil­li­ams, some­body was shout­ing, “He’s got a gun!” Fol­low­ing a crowd in­to the club’s gar­age, Wil­li­ams dis­covered that Grimm and the hus­band had re­turned, and Grimm was hold­ing a weapon. Grimm was “car­ry­ing on like a mad­man,” Wil­li­ams said. “He’s scream­ing, ‘I’m gonna fuckin’ kill him.’ So I said to him, ‘Who are you?’ He put the gun back in his waist and said, ‘I’m a fuck­ing F.B.I. agent, ain’t nobody gonna threaten me.’ “

Grimm denied mak­ing those threats. But the story goes on:

Grimm left the club, but at 4 A.M., just be­fore the club closed, he re­turned again, ac­cord­ing to Wil­li­ams, this time with an­oth­er F.B.I. agent and a group of N.Y.P.D. of­ficers. Grimm had told the po­lice that he had been as­saul­ted by the es­tranged hus­band and his friends. Wil­li­ams said that Grimm took com­mand of the scene, and re­fused to let the re­main­ing pat­rons and em­ploy­ees leave. “Every­body get up against the fuck­ing wall,” Wil­li­ams re­called him say­ing. “The F.B.I. is in con­trol.” Then Grimm, who ap­par­ently wanted to find the man with whom he’d had the ori­gin­al al­ter­ca­tion, said something that Wil­li­ams said he’ll nev­er for­get: “All the white people get out of here.”

You should really read Rat­liff’s en­tire story, as well as his fol­low-up posts ex­plain­ing what Grimm denies and how Rat­liff sourced the story, to get a full un­der­stand­ing of the con­text of the claims. Rat­liff also goes on to de­tail some of the more re­cent cam­paign fin­ance is­sues Grimm is fa­cing, in­clud­ing al­leg­a­tions that he and a New York rabbi, now un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion for al­legedly em­bezz­ling mil­lions from his con­greg­a­tion, col­lec­ted dona­tions that far ex­ceeded cam­paign fin­ance lim­its on in­di­vidu­al giv­ing. (That rabbi later pleaded guilty to visa fraud.) Earli­er this month, the FBI ar­res­ted a former fun­draiser for Grimm, al­leging she funneled $10,000 worth of il­leg­al dona­tions to his cam­paign.

Even be­fore that New York­er story came out, I had a good sense of Grimm’s tem­per. In March 2011, he was part of the fresh­man class I covered as a re­port­er for Politico, and I wrote a story about him cri­ti­ciz­ing fel­low con­ser­vat­ives for risk­ing a gov­ern­ment shut­down. “I don’t rep­res­ent the tea party or any­body like that, I rep­res­ent Staten Is­land and Brook­lyn. If we’re go­ing to make those cuts they’re go­ing to be smart,” he told me at the time. The tea party did not ap­pre­ci­ate that state­ment. So Grimm’s press sec­ret­ary called me back to in­sist he’d said “I don’t rep­res­ent only the tea party” and that I needed to is­sue a cor­rec­tion. I checked my notes, con­firmed my quote, and told them I was sorry but I couldn’t is­sue a cor­rec­tion. At the time it seemed like a mat­ter of prin­ciple: I wasn’t go­ing to is­sue a cor­rec­tion just be­cause someone was ex­per­i­en­cing a bit of con­tro­versy over his words. And that’s when Grimm got on the phone and star­ted shout­ing at me.

It’s been a few years since this happened, and I don’t re­mem­ber all of the de­tails. I do re­mem­ber him re­peatedly yelling that he “did not serve 10 years in the FBI!” to have to put up with something like this. To be clear, at no time did I feel threatened, nor did I feel par­tic­u­larly scared or up­set—al­though that seemed pretty clearly to me to be what he was try­ing to ac­com­plish. I was a little shocked, but I gave as good as I got, and he took it to my ed­it­or, and we even­tu­ally settled on this blog post where he got to cla­ri­fy his claims. Com­pared to last night’s out­burst, it was pretty tame. Still, I’ve nev­er dealt with any­one so angry be­fore, or since.

I’ve seen some people on Twit­ter this morn­ing sug­gest that the out­rage over Grimm’s out­burst is over­blown. Polit­ics ain’t bean­bag, and if you want to be in­volved in it you should learn to toughen up. Fair enough. But put­ting aside the an­noy­ing double stand­ard with which we treat emo­tion­al out­bursts on the job (cry­ing at work is seen as un­ac­cept­ably shame­ful, even though that dis­play of emo­tion is in­wardly dir­ec­ted and harms no one, where­as an­ger, which ac­tu­ally can harm people, is of­ten ra­tion­al­ized as a dis­play of pas­sion or in­tens­ity) Scotto was ask­ing Grimm, a pub­lic of­fi­cial, about a ser­i­ous and im­port­ant is­sue. Do we really want a polit­ic­al cul­ture in which journ­al­ists can’t ask pub­lic of­fi­cials le­git­im­ate ques­tions without get­ting brow­beaten?

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4694) }}

What We're Following See More »
LEGACY PLAY
Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
11 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
×