Farm Bill Finally Passes the House

The 959-page legislation advanced Wednesday with the lower-chamber support it lacked last year.

National Journal
Sarah Mimms Marina Koren
Jan. 29, 2014, 6:01 a.m.

Nearly 48 hours after con­gres­sion­al ne­go­ti­at­ors re­vealed the le­gis­la­tion, the five-year farm bill passed the House by a 251-166 vote Wed­nes­day morn­ing.

Sixty-three Re­pub­lic­ans and 103 Demo­crats op­posed the bill, which now heads to the Sen­ate, where pas­sage is ex­pec­ted as early as Thursday. Pres­id­ent Obama has said he will sign it, ful­filling one of his three ma­jor pri­or­it­ies for 2013 — the budget, im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and a farm bill — a few weeks late.

So far, ad­dress­ing the na­tion’s long-term ag­ri­cul­ture policy has seen smooth­er sail­ing in Con­gress than it did last year. Wed­nes­day’s vote comes just six months after the le­gis­la­tion, which typ­ic­ally sails through Con­gress, un­ex­pec­tedly failed in the House when Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship mis­cal­cu­lated sup­port. The 2013 bill went down thanks in part to the con­ser­vat­ive push for large cuts to the food-stamp pro­gram that pulled any Demo­crat­ic sup­port away from the le­gis­la­tion.

The Sen­ate had passed its own ver­sion of the le­gis­la­tion, which in­cluded few­er cuts to the food-stamp pro­gram than its House coun­ter­part, but ne­go­ti­ations stalled after the failed House vote. The House passed a scaled-down ver­sion of its own bill in Ju­ly, but it did not in­clude food-stamp policy.

The new bill cuts about $8 bil­lion from the Sup­ple­ment­al Nu­tri­tion As­sist­ance Pro­gram (food stamps) over five years — about double what the Sen­ate ver­sion of the bill re­ques­ted, but less than half of what House ne­go­ti­at­ors wanted. Those cuts of­fen­ded many pro­gress­ives, who op­posed the bill Wed­nes­day.

Dozens of Re­pub­lic­ans de­cried the bill. The 959-page le­gis­la­tion was re­leased Monday night, giv­ing law­makers less than 48 hours to read it. Mem­bers on both sides of the aisle com­plained that Speak­er John Boehner had broken House Re­pub­lic­ans’ own pledge to al­low mem­bers three days to read bills be­fore they hit the floor. And sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ives warned they could not sup­port le­gis­la­tion that may in­clude a num­ber of pork pro­jects that they wouldn’t no­tice un­til after the bill had passed.

The 2014 le­gis­la­tion is the res­ult of months of ne­go­ti­ations between con­fer­ees from both cham­bers, led by the two Ag­ri­cul­ture com­mit­tees’ chairs, Demo­crat­ic Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and GOP Rep. Frank Lu­cas of Ok­lahoma. The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice has es­tim­ated that the bill will spend $956 bil­lion over five years and cut $16.6 bil­lion in over­all spend­ing over 10 years.

Be­fore the 15-minute vote began, Lu­cas called the farm-bill deal close to a “mir­acle.”

After wit­ness­ing the farm bill’s sud­den fail­ure last year, Stabenow spent Wed­nes­day morn­ing in the House Demo­crat­ic cloak­room to en­cour­age her col­leagues to back the le­gis­la­tion and watch the fi­nal vote.

“I was ex­tremely pleased with the fi­nal tally,” Stabenow said after the vote. “I learned a long time ago that it’s not over un­til the vote is closed, so I wanted to make ab­so­lutely sure…. I came over to be per­son­ally in­volved to make sure that didn’t hap­pen again.”

House Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­ee rank­ing mem­ber Col­lin Peterson, D-Minn., said he re­peatedly told Stabenow to calm down, re­as­sur­ing her that they’d have the votes. “Stabenow, she was all over the place. She was run­ning all over the floor,” he joked.

Stabenow still has the Sen­ate to worry about, though she pre­dicted that the bill will pass. Lu­cas, however, is off the hook.

After the vote, Lu­cas said he would spend the af­ter­noon cel­eb­rat­ing by fi­nally get­ting a few minutes to him­self to “let the blood pres­sure level drop just a little bit.”

COR­REC­TION: An earli­er ver­sion of this story gave the in­cor­rect state for Rep. Col­lin Peterson. He rep­res­ents Min­nesota.

Elahe Izadi contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
21 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
47 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×