Obama Touts Progress in Iran, Afghanistan

But he had little to say about Iraq or Syria.

The entrance to Camp Justice at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Jan. 28, 2014, 5:30 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama used his State of the Uni­on bully pul­pit to sell the re­cent deal world powers struck with Ir­an as a for­eign policy break­through and a chance to avoid a fu­ture con­flict, prom­ised the end of this coun­try’s longest war in Afgh­anistan, and urged Con­gress to close the Guantanamo Bay pris­on — again.

Even as Is­rael and some U.S. law­makers cri­ti­cize the in­ter­im deal with Ir­an as not be­ing strict enough, Obama de­fen­ded the agree­ment that rolled back parts of Tehran’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram “for the very first time in a dec­ade.”

The pres­id­ent ramped up the pres­sure on mem­bers of Con­gress — in­clud­ing Demo­crats — who are seek­ing more sanc­tions against Ir­an as ne­go­ti­ations con­tin­ue. Prom­ising to veto those meas­ures if they make it to his desk now, Obama said, “for the sake of our na­tion­al se­cur­ity, we must give dip­lomacy a chance to suc­ceed.” If that fails, all op­tions, pre­sum­ably in­clud­ing mil­it­ary ac­tion, are still on table. “I will be the first to call for more sanc­tions,” Obama said, “and stand ready to ex­er­cise all op­tions to make sure Ir­an does not build a nuc­le­ar weapon.” This pub­lic prom­ise may sway some of his crit­ics.

Obama also touted his role as war-en­der-in-chief. When he took of­fice, nearly 180,000 Amer­ic­ans were serving in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan; the war in Ir­aq is, of course, over, and with the form­al end of com­bat op­er­a­tions in Afgh­anistan this year, “Amer­ica’s longest war will fi­nally be over.” Obama is con­sid­er­ing leav­ing a small force of U.S. troops for nar­row counter-ter­ror­ism and train­ing mis­sions — if such a deal can be reached with Afgh­anistan. Out­go­ing pres­id­ent Ham­id Kar­zai has so far re­fused to sign the se­cur­ity agree­ment both coun­tries already ne­go­ti­ated.

Obama stressed the need to close the Guantanamo Bay pris­on ““ a goal which has eluded him since the be­gin­ning of his pres­id­ency. “With the Afghan war end­ing, this needs to be the year Con­gress lifts the re­main­ing re­stric­tions on de­tain­ee trans­fers and we close the pris­on at Guantanamo Bay,” Obama said, “be­cause we counter ter­ror­ism not just through in­tel­li­gence and mil­it­ary ac­tion, but by re­main­ing true to our Con­sti­tu­tion­al ideals, and set­ting an ex­ample for the rest of the world.” It ac­tu­ally could hap­pen. The tide may be turn­ing in his fa­vor; the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill Obama signed late last year re­laxed re­stric­tions on trans­fer­ring de­tain­ees to the cus­tody of for­eign coun­tries.

Obama didn’t talk much about Ir­aq, where the news that al-Qaida-linked mil­it­ants took over cit­ies hard won by U.S. troops dur­ing the long war broke the hearts of Mar­ines who fought there. And he glossed over the status of the Syr­i­an con­flict, where the bloody civil war still rages and peace talks ap­pear dead­locked. Obama did say the U.S. will “sup­port the op­pos­i­tion that re­jects the agenda of ter­ror­ist net­works” and stressed the role of Amer­ic­an dip­lomacy in con­vin­cing Syr­ia to elim­in­ate its stocks of chem­ic­al weapons— after the U.S. threatened to use mil­it­ary force.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×