House and Senate leaders on Monday night announced a conference committee had reached bipartisan agreement on a five-year farm-bill conference report, and the House Rules Committee was moving in the evening to set up a floor vote on Wednesday.
As described in an announcement from House Agriculture Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., and Senate Agriculture Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., the measure — which costs more than $900 billion over 10 years — contains a number of major reforms.
There was no official score yet as of early Monday night from the Congressional Budget Office. But the Rules Committee was expected to reconvene later in the evening to set floor procedures for the anticipated vote.
“We are putting in place sound policy that is good for farmers, ranchers, consumers, and those who have hit difficult times,” said Lucas, while Stabenow added that the bipartisan bill “saves taxpayers billions, eliminates unnecessary subsidies, creates a more effective farm safety-net, and helps farmers and businesses create jobs.”
After House passage, the bill would then move to the Senate for final approval. When asked if the measure would pass both chambers, Stabenow said she was very “optimistic.”
One of the most contentious parts of the bill — the amount of a cut to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps — has a been resolved with a compromise cut of about $8 billion to $8.5 billion over 10 years, aides to committee members say. That resolution lands between the Senate’s proposed $4 billion cuts and the House’s $39 billion proposed savings. The compromise cut to food stamps is paid for with changes to the way some states calculate a household’s benefit level for food assistance under the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. The agreement also is described as strengthening crop insurance.
A lingering issue has been how far the federal government should go in continuing price controls that artificially sustain certain dairy price levels. That is a practice that is backed by many lawmakers but opposed by others who complain it costs taxpayers billions of dollars, with House Speaker John Boehner even deriding it as a “Soviet-style” system. Details were sketchy, but one member of the conference, Rep. Steve Southerland, R-Fla., said that Boehner was “in agreement” with how the bill addresses that.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.