Tim Scott, the black Republican appointed to the Senate by South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, was singled out by the NAACP’s North Carolina chapter president for, well, being black and a Republican. “A ventriloquist can always find a good dummy,” the Rev. William C. Barber II, told churchgoers last week.
Asked about the insult on Friday, Scott took the high road. “The best way to respond to attacks from someone you’ve never met, who’s never been there during the most difficult times of your life, is not to respond at all.”
His decision not to fight fire with fire is typical of a low-key style that sets him apart from fiery tea-party brethren like Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz. While his fellow Republicans garnered national media attention for stinging appraisals of the government’s “War on Poverty” earlier this month, Scott’s speech on the Senate floor went largely unnoticed.
“I don’t know that I’ve been quiet. I’ve spoken when I wanted to say something,” he said after addressing a Republican National Committee meeting in Washington. “My thought is that just because you have a lot of microphones doesn’t mean you need to fill them all with words.”
That’s not a sentiment heard often in a town of loudmouths and grandstanders. And Scott, who grew up poor with a single mother, has a unique perspective on what he calls “the opportunity agenda.” He’s filed legislation to expand school choice and job training.
“I wouldn’t call him quiet. I would call him constructive,” said Matt Moore, chairman of the South Carolina Republican Party.
Scott visits or Skypes with schoolchildren about twice a month, and Moore accompanied him last year to his old high school in Charleston. “When he was finished the kids stood up and cheered for him even though they all come from Democratic households,” Moore said.
In his speech to the RNC, Scott urged Republicans to offer solutions to help the needy. “We are going to have to embrace people in a way they deserve to be embraced,” he said. “If we win people, elections will take care of themselves.”
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.