House GOP at 2014 Crossroads: Go Big, or Keep Quiet?

Republicans finally want to move big, bold legislation. But with midterm elections looming, will Boehner let them?

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) (C) is surrounded by U.S. Capitol Police plainclothes officers as he arrives at the U.S. Captiol October 11, 2013.
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Jan. 16, 2014, midnight

A stra­tegic di­vide is emer­ging with­in the House GOP over how to gov­ern in 2014, a rift that Re­pub­lic­ans fear could grow lar­ger at their con­fer­ence re­treat later this month.

Speak­er John Boehner spent weeks be­fore last Janu­ary’s re­treat meet­ing privately with five lead­ing con­ser­vat­ive law­makers to craft a le­gis­lat­ive play­book that would unite the con­fer­ence in 2013. There is no such co­ordin­a­tion head­ing in­to this ses­sion.

In­stead, lead­er­ship of­fi­cials and con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers have been hud­dling sep­ar­ately to strategize for the year ahead. And based on con­ver­sa­tions with dozens of Re­pub­lic­an law­makers and aides, those plans ap­pear to be on a col­li­sion course when Re­pub­lic­ans gath­er in Cam­bridge, Md., from Jan. 29 through Jan. 31.

The com­ing clash won’t re­volve around the debt ceil­ing, even though it’s the most press­ing is­sue and the one re­spons­ible for con­sist­ent in­terne­cine con­flict over the past few years. (Con­ser­vat­ives have tempered their ex­pect­a­tions for this debt-lim­it fight, and they sound resigned to lead­er­ship passing an ex­ten­sion with some re­l­at­ively mod­est policy rider at­tached.) Mean­while, more fun­da­ment­ally, a fight is brew­ing with­in the con­fer­ence over the GOP’s le­gis­lat­ive am­bi­tion in this midterm elec­tion year.

Ac­cord­ing to sources with know­ledge of the de­lib­er­a­tions, Boehner and his lead­er­ship team prefer a quiet, non­con­tro­ver­sial le­gis­lat­ive ses­sion in which Re­pub­lic­ans steer clear of mis­takes and run out the clock un­til the Novem­ber elec­tions. This play-it-safe strategy hinges on voters turn­ing out in droves to voice their dis­pleas­ure with Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law and his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s do­mest­ic-sur­veil­lance policies, among oth­er things.

But such an ap­proach is un­ac­cept­able to the most con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers of the House GOP. After two weeks of private de­lib­er­a­tions, and fresh off a mini-re­treat this week or­gan­ized by the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, con­ser­vat­ives are united in their re­solve to make 2014 more about Re­pub­lic­ans’ “bold, pos­it­ive vis­ion” and less about Obama’s fail­ures.

“I’m con­vinced Re­pub­lic­ans have the best vis­ion for Amer­ica’s fu­ture,” Rep. Kev­in Brady of Texas said out­side of Wed­nes­day’s RSC meet­ing. “We’ve spent a lot of time op­pos­ing the pres­id­ent’s policies, but it’s time to share our vis­ion if we want to win in Novem­ber.”

That sen­ti­ment has echoed among con­ser­vat­ive law­makers all week, and it ramped up dur­ing the weekly RSC gath­er­ing. Chair­man Steve Scal­ise, per­haps sens­ing the frus­tra­tion some mem­bers felt with the RSC’s lack of ag­gres­sion dur­ing the Decem­ber budget fight, framed the le­gis­lat­ive-strategy de­bate in big terms. After con­sult­ing with his fel­low law­makers this week, Scal­ise in­formed mem­bers that he’s pre­pared to push lead­er­ship hard this year on the con­ser­vat­ive agenda that touts a health care al­tern­at­ive, a tax-re­form plan, a wel­fare-re­form pack­age, and a pri­vacy bill.

“I don’t want to play pre­vent de­fense,” Scal­ise said, ac­cord­ing to mem­bers in at­tend­ance. “I want to play of­fense.”

Asked to ex­plain the re­mark later in an in­ter­view, Scal­ise said, “Usu­ally teams that play pre­vent de­fense lose the game.”

But Boehner’s team doesn’t share that view. GOP lead­er­ship has done everything pos­sible in re­cent months to keep the elect­or­ate’s at­ten­tion on the Demo­crats, es­pe­cially high­light­ing the dis­astrous rol­lout of Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law and Re­pub­lic­an over­sight ef­forts on the IRS scan­dal and Benghazi at­tacks. Lead­er­ship of­fi­cials are in­tent on keep­ing the Amer­ic­an pub­lic “talk­ing about Obama­care” all the way un­til Novem­ber.

Be­sides, already few­er than 90 work days re­main in the le­gis­lat­ive ses­sion. Even if lead­er­ship of­fi­cials were to em­brace an am­bi­tious agenda, they see little time to im­ple­ment it.

“We have to do a budget, we have to do ap­pro­pri­ations, we have to do debt ceil­ing. There are a lot of is­sues that are hanging out there that have to be done that dom­in­ate a lot of the cal­en­dar,” said Rep. James Lank­ford, the Re­pub­lic­an policy chair­man and a mem­ber of lead­er­ship.

That said, many of the con­ser­vat­ives’ policy ob­ject­ives for 2014 are likely dead on ar­rival in Cam­bridge any­way.

On the is­sue of the day, Obama­care, GOP lead­er­ship has been un­der siege for months as Re­pub­lic­an law­makers have begged them to bring an al­tern­at­ive plan to the floor for a vote. But just as they did in 2013, Boehner’s team ap­pears con­tent to sit back and bet on Obama­care col­lapsing un­der its own weight this year — an­ger­ing Re­pub­lic­ans who say such a strategy plays in­to the pres­id­ent’s ac­cus­a­tion that the GOP has no ideas of its own.

The RSC health care pack­age craf­ted by Rep. Phil Roe of Ten­ness­ee has more than 120 co­spon­sors, and an­oth­er plan long cham­pioned by Rep. Tom Price of Geor­gia en­joys wide­spread sup­port in the con­fer­ence. Yet neither Price nor Roe nor any of their GOP col­leagues have been able to per­suade lead­er­ship to en­dorse one of these Obama­care al­tern­at­ives.

“We need a health care bill. And the an­swer’s al­ways the same: ‘We don’t have 218 for that,’ ” said Rep. Mick Mul­vaney of South Car­o­lina, re­fer­ring to the num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an votes needed to pass a bill. “Dam­mit, let’s go out and get 218. I mean, ser­i­ously.”

An­oth­er big-tick­et policy item, tax re­form, has been on Re­pub­lic­ans’ agenda ever since they won back the ma­jor­ity three years ago. But Ways and Means Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dave Camp, who has spent years craft­ing a com­pre­hens­ive over­haul, was told by GOP lead­er­ship in Novem­ber that the tim­ing isn’t right for a ma­jor re­write of the tax code.

This angered many con­ser­vat­ives, who say they still haven’t got­ten an an­swer on why lead­er­ship pulled the plug. “You’ll have to ask them,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, a former RSC chair­man. “We’ve been wait­ing three years for a bill. I think the vast ma­jor­ity of the con­fer­ence is already there and wait­ing. So let’s see the bill.”

Oth­er pro­pos­als such as wel­fare-re­form and pri­vacy le­gis­la­tion haven’t been spe­cific­ally re­jec­ted or delayed by lead­er­ship. But already, con­ser­vat­ives get the sense that, as with oth­er policy ini­ti­at­ives, Boehner’s team would rather play it safe and not jeop­ard­ize the elect­or­al suc­cess that ap­pears prob­able for Re­pub­lic­ans this fall.

Such an ap­proach is not without mer­it. Put­ting out con­tro­ver­sial policy pro­pos­als al­ways car­ries a risk, top Re­pub­lic­ans say, and that gamble can be­come down­right reck­less when a bill stands no chance of passing the oth­er cham­ber or be­ing signed in­to law any­way.

“It’s ap­par­ent, with four Re­pub­lic­an amend­ments in the Sen­ate in the last six months, the Sen­ate isn’t in­ter­ested in tak­ing up any­thing that’s a con­ser­vat­ive idea,” Lank­ford said.

Moreover, as Re­pub­lic­ans ap­proach what ap­pears to be a fa­vor­able midterm elec­tion, Boehner’s team ar­gues it makes sense to wait for the ar­rival of re­in­force­ments — in­clud­ing, per­haps, a Sen­ate ma­jor­ity — be­fore pur­su­ing some of their lofti­er, and ris­ki­er, policy am­bi­tions.

“The best way to achieve con­ser­vat­ive policy goals is to hold the House and take over the Sen­ate,” one House lead­er­ship aide said.

But rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­ans in­sist they won’t ac­cept that ap­proach.

“Folks don’t want to vote against some­body, they want to vote in fa­vor of something,” said Rep. Rob Woodall of Geor­gia. “If we were bank­rupt in our ideas, we’d have to run against Obama­care. But we’re not. We have won­der­ful ideas — and I want to spend every day telling people about those.”

“This is no time to duck in­to a fox­hole,” said Rep. Cyn­thia Lum­mis of Wyom­ing. “This is the time for Re­pub­lic­ans to lead.”

Iron­ic­ally, the one hot-but­ton sub­ject Boehner and his team want to ad­dress this year — im­mig­ra­tion — is not a pri­or­ity for most rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­ans. In fact, some warn that re­sur­rect­ing the de­bate over what to do about the na­tion’s un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants could hurt Re­pub­lic­an pro­spects in Novem­ber by quelling what is cur­rently a fired-up con­ser­vat­ive base.

“Every day that we dis­cuss im­mig­ra­tion helps Barack Obama change the top­ic from Obama­care,” said Rep. Steve King of Iowa, the House’s lead­ing op­pon­ent of im­mig­ra­tion-re­form ef­forts.

Of course, every day that Re­pub­lic­ans dis­cuss im­mig­ra­tion also gives King a plat­form to say something that dam­ages the GOP’s na­tion­al brand, and in turn, hurts the party’s chances of re­cap­tur­ing the Sen­ate in Novem­ber.

Re­pub­lic­ans, though, say there is ur­gency in push­ing ag­gress­ive policy solu­tions in 2014 — elec­tion year or not. Stay­ing quiet and let­ting Demo­crats beat them­selves may be a win­ning for­mula for Novem­ber, they say, but such a le­gis­lat­ive strategy does little to po­s­i­tion the party for broad­er elect­or­al gains and a shot at win­ning back the White House.

“We have to stop be­ing afraid. Re­pub­lic­ans are al­ways afraid,” said Rep. Raul Lab­rador of Idaho. “We can­not win in 2016 if we don’t win in 2014. And we can­not win in 2014 if we don’t show a bold vis­ion for Amer­ica.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4660) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×