Republicans Try to Beat Democrats at Their Own Game on Economic Inequality

Marco Rubio isn’t the first to try to put economic fairness on GOP grounds.

Sen. Marco Rubio addresses an event held by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, January 8, 2014 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
See more stories about...
Jack Fitzpatrick
Jan. 9, 2014, midnight

As Demo­crats push to make in­come in­equal­ity one of the cent­ral is­sues of 2014, Re­pub­lic­ans are rolling with the punches and present­ing them­selves as the party that has truly helped the poor.

Demo­crats used Wed­nes­day’s 50th an­niversary of the War on Poverty and Tues­day’s Sen­ate bill on un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance to shift at­ten­tion to­ward the wealth gap, and Pres­id­ent Obama will likely fo­cus on it in his State of the Uni­on speech later this month, too.

But Re­pub­lic­ans have re­fused to simply sur­render the turf to Demo­crats, or to ig­nore the is­sue al­to­geth­er. Rather than ced­ing the spot­light of Wed­nes­day’s an­niversary to his op­pon­ents, Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida gave a speech in which he ar­gued that Pres­id­ent Obama’s eco­nom­ic policies have hurt the poor and that the so-called war, be­gun by Pres­id­ent John­son, has been a fail­ure.

Demo­crats, Ru­bio said, “help people deal with poverty, but they do not help them es­cape it.”

It was the latest in­stance this week in which Re­pub­lic­ans have tried to turn the tables on Demo­crats, who have aimed to draw at­ten­tion from the Af­ford­able Care Act’s troubled rol­lout and fo­cus it on what they con­sider a more fa­vor­able is­sue.

Demo­crats scored a small vic­tory Tues­day by ad­van­cing the Sen­ate bill on un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance to a full de­bate, but Re­pub­lic­ans made the case that Obama’s eco­nom­ic policies have hurt the people the bill was meant to help. Zero­ing in on the Af­ford­able Care Act and en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions, Re­pub­lic­ans took a not­ably egal­it­ari­an tone.

“We all know the stock mar­ket’s been do­ing great, so the richest among us are do­ing just fine,” Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell said in a floor speech on Tues­day. “But what about the poor? What about work­ing-class folks? What about folks who work in in­dus­tries that lib­er­als don’t ap­prove of, like coal?”

Mc­Con­nell, who is up for reelec­tion this year, has pushed for an amend­ment that would off­set the cost of the bill, and he called for a one-year delay in the Af­ford­able Care Act’s in­di­vidu­al man­date.

Oth­er big-name Re­pub­lic­ans — in­clud­ing Sen­ate Minor­ity Whip John Cornyn and House Speak­er John Boehner — fol­lowed Mc­Con­nell’s lead. Boehner called for an un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance amend­ment to off­set costs, and sug­ges­ted in a press re­lease that Obama delay the Af­ford­able Care Act’s in­di­vidu­al man­date, ap­prove the Key­stone Pipeline, and re­duce EPA reg­u­la­tions on power plants to pro­mote job growth.

It’s un­der­stand­able that Re­pub­lic­ans have entered the ring in the fight over eco­nom­ic equal­ity, rather than avoid­ing or brush­ing off the top­ic, con­sid­er­ing that voters strongly fa­vor policies that help the poor. In a Decem­ber ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll, 57 per­cent of re­spond­ents said they wanted the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to pur­sue policies that try to re­duce the gap between the rich and the poor.

With Obama­care still strug­gling, Re­pub­lic­ans have every reas­on to try to tie the de­bate over in­come in­equal­ity to health care. Party lead­ers have ar­gued that the law could hurt small busi­nesses and lead to few­er full-time jobs. And the law is as un­pop­u­lar as ever, ac­cord­ing to a CNN/ORC sur­vey in which 62 per­cent of re­spond­ents said they op­posed the law. Health-care re­form was the most com­monly cited is­sue in a poll ask­ing Amer­ic­ans which prob­lems the gov­ern­ment needs to work on in 2014, men­tioned by the ma­jor­ity of par­ti­cipants in an AP/NORC poll.

While Re­pub­lic­ans try to ap­peal to the lower middle class on health care, Demo­crats are coun­ter­ing with an em­phas­is on the fed­er­al min­im­um wage, spon­sor­ing House and Sen­ate ver­sions of a bill that would raise the wage to $11 over two years. Nearly two-thirds of the ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll’s re­spond­ents sup­por­ted such a raise, and Re­pub­lic­ans have widely op­posed it. Ru­bio main­tained that rais­ing the min­im­um wage would not help the poor in the long term, call­ing it “at best only a par­tial solu­tion” in his Wed­nes­day speech.

Ru­bio and oth­er con­ser­vat­ives have made the case that un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance is a dis­trac­tion from the best solu­tion to un­em­ploy­ment: jobs. If Demo­crats suc­ceed in mak­ing the wealth gap one of the top is­sues of the next year, ex­pect Re­pub­lic­ans to con­tin­ue stand­ing their ground, re­spond­ing with a mes­sage of job cre­ation.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4647) }}

What We're Following See More »
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

FIRST CHANGE IN FOUR DECADES
Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Source:
NO MORE INDEPENDENT VOTERS?
GOP Could Double Number of Early Primaries
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."

Source:
LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
EFFECTIVE NEXT MONTH
House GOP Changes Rules for Spending Measures
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.

Source:
×