It’s going to be a late night for senators on Capitol Hill. But worry not: Just a few feet away in the Old Senate Chamber, there’ll be cots for the lawmakers to rest.
Breaking out the cots is a rare occurrence, but they’re always available for the tired legislator. On Wednesday, senators are expected to be up until the wee hours of the night, debating and voting on presidential nominees.
“We haven’t seen this in a while,” one Senate Historical Office staffer said. In fact, the office has documented the “all-night sessions” since 1915, ranging from debates on the Sugar Act of 1960 to the debt limit in 1981.
The keeper of the cots, the Senate sergeant at arms, coordinates with Capitol Facilities, which stores the cots and sets up proper napping areas when senators need it.
Cots are lined up on July 17, 2007, during an all-night debate before voting on an amendment to the defense authorization bill. (Joshua Roberts/Getty Images)Here are some of the times they’ve been used:
From The Washington Post in 1977 during the debate of the Natural Gas Policy Act:
Not since the fight over the 1964 Civil Rights Act, when cots were set up in the old Supreme Court chamber near the Senate floor, has the Senate sat up all night to try to break a filibuster.”
The next day, the newspaper reported:
In contrast to these lonely debates, bells dominated this one, summoning senators from their naps on nearby cots and couches for a steady succession of roll calls. All but 12 of the Senate’s 100 members answered to their names at a 2:15 a.m. reading of the roster. Eighty-six of them showed up at another roll call an hour later. Many of the senators were seething.
Reading like a line from a children’s book, The Post document another time the cots were pulled out in 1982 for the budget:
Not far away, Democrats napped. Signs on the Mike Mansfield Room, where cots had been installed, allowed “senators only.”
So, no matter how late the senators stay up, they’ll always have a place to rest their heads when debating gets too tiresome.
- 1 Bernie Sanders Is a Loud, Stubborn Socialist. Republicans Like Him Anyway.
- 2 A Horrible Day for American Leadership
- 3 Harry Reid Saved Obamacare—but at a Price That Could Still Kill It
- 4 Why Every Member of Congress Gets a Monthly Porn Delivery
- 5 How Politics Breaks Our Brains, and How We Can Put Them Back Together
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.