Obama Will Warn GOP Against Homeland Security Shutdown

The president plans to preview his budget proposal at Democratic retreat, call for end to sequestration.

US President Barack Obama delivers the State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on January 28, 2014 at the US Capitol in Washington. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Alex Brown
Jan. 29, 2015, 1 a.m.

PHIL­ADELPHIA—Pres­id­ent Obama will strike a de­fi­ant tone today at a gath­er­ing of House Demo­crats, call­ing on Con­gress to roll back se­quest­ra­tion cuts and jab­bing Re­pub­lic­ans for threat­en­ing fund­ing for the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment.

Obama plans use the party re­treat to pre­view his budget pro­pos­al, which will be re­leased Monday. While the plan has no chance of mak­ing its way through a GOP-con­trolled Con­gress, it’s a vehicle for Demo­crats to out­line clear policy pri­or­it­ies—which many lead­ers be­lieve the party failed to do dur­ing the 2014 midterms.

The White House jumped on a quote this week from Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mario Diaz-Bal­art that it wouldn’t be “the end of the world” if DHS fund­ing lapsed. “[T]he pres­id­ent will join the Demo­crats in Con­gress in vehe­mently op­pos­ing that dan­ger­ous view and call­ing for a clean fund­ing bill to en­sure we are fund­ing our na­tion­al se­cur­ity pri­or­it­ies in the face of cy­ber­se­cur­ity and se­cur­ity threats abroad,” said an ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial.

Obama wasn’t alone in chal­len­ging Re­pub­lic­ans to pony up the fund­ing. “Re­pub­lic­ans will­ing­ness to put their polit­ic­al se­cur­ity ahead of na­tion­al se­cur­ity is a dis­grace,” Rep. Ben Ray Lu­jan, the newly named head of the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, told re­port­ers at the House Demo­crats’ re­treat. “The Amer­ic­an people de­serve bet­ter.”

The White House has threatened to veto a GOP plan that ex­tends DHS fund­ing while re­vers­ing Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions to pro­tect il­leg­al im­mig­rants from de­port­a­tion. Re­pub­lic­ans have said they don’t want the de­part­ment to shut down, but they strongly be­lieve that Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions are il­leg­al and should be blocked by Con­gress.

Mean­while, Obama will call for an end to se­quest­ra­tion, the auto­mat­ic and in­dis­crim­in­ate budget cuts that went in­to ef­fect in 2013, slash­ing ex­pendit­ures for al­most every fed­er­al agency. Obama “will pro­pose to end the across-the-board se­quester cuts that threaten our eco­nomy and our mil­it­ary,” said the White House of­fi­cial. “The Pres­id­ent be­lieves we should end the era of man­u­fac­tured crises and mind­less aus­ter­ity.”

Even be­fore its re­lease, Obama’s pro­pos­al drew praise from Demo­crats on the Hill. “Ar­bit­rary cuts through se­quest­ra­tion nev­er made sense, and House Demo­crats have con­sist­ently sup­por­ted re­pla­cing them with a smarter, more bal­anced ap­proach to long-term de­fi­cit re­duc­tion,” Budget Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Chris Van Hol­len said in a state­ment.

Demo­crats gathered here said their caucus needs to get bet­ter at draw­ing dis­tinc­tions with Re­pub­lic­ans, draw­ing policy con­trasts des­pite serving in the minor­ity. Rep. Steve Is­rael cited a middle-class tax cut pro­posed by Van Hol­len a few weeks ago as a step in the right dir­ec­tion, and party lead­ers will no doubt use Obama’s budget pri­or­it­ies to sim­il­ar ef­fect.

Is­rael, among oth­ers, said Demo­crats are eager to rally around Obama’s State of the Uni­on ad­dress to guide the party’s goals for the year. “[Obama] set the table, and now we’ve got to dish out the meal le­gis­lat­ively,” he said. “That was the per­fect launch for a mes­sage that we can all gal­van­ize and mo­bil­ize around.”

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
The Truth Is Out There, Says Podesta
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

On the one hand, you could say that in discussing UFOs and possible alien sightings, Hillary Clinton's campaign chief isn't focusing on more serious matters at hand. But then again, if he knows something we don't, what could be more serious? Speaking on CNN, John Podesta said, "The U.S. government could do a much better job in answering the quite legitimate questions that people have about what's going on with unidentified aerial phenomena." Clinton has already pledged to release relevant records if she becomes president. One thing is clear, said Podesta: "The American people can handle the truth."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
A Holy War Over DC’s New Museum of the Bible
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Newsweek takes a long-read look at Hobby Lobby's Steve Green, and his quest to bring the $800 million, eight-story Museum of the Bible to DC next year. Green's mission: to “'restore' the Bible to its rightful place—as he sees it—in the center of American life and government." But plenty of critics are questioning the scholarship behind the museum, and expressing concerns that it will "present a narrow, evangelical version of the Bible and its role in American society, one that ignores versions of the text used by Jews, Muslims and the many Christians of other creeds."

Source:
STILL PLENTY OF WORK TO DO
Sanders Closing Gap in New York, California
1 days ago
THE LATEST

A new Emerson College poll has Hillary Clinton leading Bernie Sanders 56%-38% in New York, ahead of their April 19 showdown there. While that's still a daunting gap, Sanders has narrowed it from a 48-point advantage for Clinton in the last Emerson poll, taken last month. Meanwhile, a new Field Poll out of California, Clinton's lead is down to six points. She leads 47%-41%, down from a double-digit lead in January.

Source:
HE’S A BIG FAN OF THE POPE
Sanders to Travel to Vatican to Speak on Social Justice
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
SANDERS WON’T RETRACT STATEMENTS
Could Sanders-Clinton Tone Lead to Unity Problems in the Fall?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The contest between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders grew increasingly nasty Thursday with a series of testy exchanges that have prompted widespread concern among Democrats that their rivalry is doing lasting damage to the party and the eventual nominee." Sanders "refused to retract his assertion that Clinton is not qualified to be president. Clinton dismissed that claim as 'silly' and countered that Sanders has repeatedly made promises he can’t keep." While Sanders "expressed regret for the tenor of the campaign over the previous 24 hours and said the acrimony will make it harder for Democrats to unite in the fall, he also said he does not regret his own statements."

Source:
×