Is This a New Wave of Compassionate Conservatism?

In her GOP response to the State of the Union, McMorris Rodgers lays out an empathetic vision for Republicans.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., delivered the Republican response for the State of the Union.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Jan. 28, 2014, 5:36 p.m.

While Re­pub­lic­ans are not call­ing it “com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ism,” they are at­tempt­ing to take the high ground with the war on poverty. And one of the biggest signs of this push was clear in the em­path­et­ic tone of the GOP’s of­fi­cial re­sponse to the State of the Uni­on.

Rep. Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers, one of the party’s rising fe­male stars, ad­ded a caring touch to her verbal re­but­tal to Pres­id­ent Obama’s prime-time ad­dress, high­light­ing her ex­per­i­ences as a moth­er and of­fer­ing a path for out-of-work or des­per­ate Amer­ic­ans.

“Our mis­sion — not only as Re­pub­lic­ans, but as Amer­ic­ans — is to once again to en­sure that we are not bound by where we come from, but em­powered by what we can be­come,” the Wash­ing­ton state Re­pub­lic­an said.

Rodgers, who is chair­wo­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence, is the highest-rank­ing Re­pub­lic­an wo­man in Con­gress and is of­ten seen next to Speak­er John Boehner dur­ing press con­fer­ences. The moth­er of three was the clear choice for a party that struggles to at­tract fe­male voters.

“We be­lieve in a gov­ern­ment that trusts people and doesn’t lim­it where you fin­ish be­cause of where you star­ted,” she said. “That is what we stand for — for an Amer­ica that is every bit as com­pas­sion­ate as it is ex­cep­tion­al.”

The use of “com­pas­sion” in her speech might help in that drive for wo­men.

The moth­er of a child with Down syn­drome also got per­son­al when talk­ing about Obama­care, say­ing, “And that wheth­er you’re a boy with Down syn­drome or a wo­man with breast can­cer, you can find cov­er­age and a doc­tor who will treat you.”

Over the week­end, House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an laid out a sim­il­ar vis­ion for the fu­ture of the Re­pub­lic­an Party in an op-ed to The Wall Street Journ­al, pro­mot­ing pro­grams that he said will lift people out of poverty. Part of that, he wrote, starts with curb­ing vari­ous wel­fare pro­grams and re­pla­cing them with pro­grams that help edu­cate their child and im­prove job train­ing.

So, it looks like Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers is pick­ing up right where he left off. Her tone even soun­ded sim­il­ar to that of former Pres­id­ent George W. Bush, who used the term “com­pas­sion” fre­quently. The concept of com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ism pos­its that the free mar­ket can be used to help the poor and im­prove oth­er so­cial prob­lems, like health care and im­mig­ra­tion. But the term has been used to de­scribe Re­pub­lic­ans who might be fak­ing em­pathy, gar­ner­ing a neg­at­ive con­nota­tion.

Rodgers took a shot of Obama, say­ing that his prom­ises sound good, but it doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily help the poor.

“The pres­id­ent talks a lot about in­come in­equal­ity,” Rodgers said. “But the real gap we face today is one of op­por­tun­ity in­equal­ity.”

And though the policies might not be any dif­fer­ent than what Re­pub­lic­ans have pro­moted in the past, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s speech might set a tone shift to help im­prove pub­lic per­cep­tion of a party once led by a mil­lion­aire pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate who in­fam­ously be­littled the “47 per­cent” look­ing for gov­ern­ment handouts.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×