Are the ‘Beautiful’ People on the Hill Cursed?

National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
Aug. 8, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

There’s the curse of the Bambino. The curse of the Hope Dia­mond. And now, maybe, there’s the curse of The Hill news­pa­per’s an­nu­al “50 Most Beau­ti­ful” list.

Of the 59 mem­bers of Con­gress who have ap­peared on the list from 2004 through 2012, 37 per­cent even­tu­ally lost reelec­tion, failed in a cam­paign for high­er of­fice, re­tired, or resigned in scan­dal.

So says polit­ic­al sci­ent­ist Eric Os­ter­mei­er, a re­search as­so­ci­ate at the Cen­ter for the Study of Polit­ics and Gov­ernance at the Uni­versity of Min­nesota, in his blog, Smart Polit­ics.

“Un­for­tu­nately, for many, it’s all down­hill,” Os­ter­mei­er wrote.

Among the folks on the list are former Sens. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and John Ed­wards, D-N.C., and former Reps. Mary Bono Mack, R-Cal­if., Jesse Jack­son Jr., D-Ill., Gene Taylor, D-Miss., and Stephanie Her­seth Sand­lin, D-S.D. Look­ing ahead to the 2014 cycle, at least one oth­er “Most Beau­ti­ful” honoree from Con­gress—Rep. Michele Bach­mann, R-Minn.—has already an­nounced she is not run­ning for reelec­tion, Os­ter­mei­er notes.

Of course, wheth­er this pat­tern is really un­nat­ur­al is de­bat­able. The rate of down­fall for those on The Hill’s list may not ex­ceed the rate for all of Con­gress. Yet it is in­ter­est­ing—if not fun—to see what misery can oc­cur to the beau­ti­ful people.

“I first thought to crunch the [num­bers] on these lists be­cause the honorees are sort of presen­ted as not just ‘beau­ti­ful’ but also ‘up-and-comers’ and soon to be big shots on the Hill,” Os­ter­mei­er told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily.

“So when a fair num­ber of these of­fice­hold­ers star­ted los­ing elec­tions, in 2010 and 2012 es­pe­cially, that drew my at­ten­tion. That, and the fact that a hand­ful of these ‘beau­ti­ful’ people have been in­volved in scan­dals in or out of of­fice,” Os­ter­mei­er ad­ded, re­fer­ring to Ed­wards, Jack­son, former Sen. John En­sign, R-Nev., and former Rep. Vito Fosella, R-N.Y.

In all, he found 10 law­makers lost reelec­tion bids; five were de­feated seek­ing high­er pub­lic of­fice; two resigned in scan­dal; and five re­tired from pub­lic life.

Os­ter­mei­er is known to pick up odd and in­ter­est­ing trends in polit­ics. His re­search earli­er this year in­cluded an ex­am­in­a­tion of the causes of death for the thou­sands of people who have served in Con­gress over the last 200 years or so. Among his find­ings: Nearly two dozen have been killed by or on trains.

But his latest re­search does not ne­ces­sar­ily spell doom for the law­makers in The Hill‘s list, people like Sens. Jeff Flake, R-Ar­iz., and Tim Scott, R-S.C., and Reps. Tulsi Gab­bard, D-Hawaii, Fre­der­ica Wilson, D-Fla., and Beto O’Rourke, D-Texas. Be­cause fully 37 of the 59 law­makers Os­ter­mei­er looked at are still hold­ing of­fice.

Among them are Speak­er John Boehner, R-Ohio., and Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal­if. And Pres­id­ent Obama, too.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×