Bitcoin and its brethren might soon change the worlds of finance and banking, but for now digital currencies are chock-full of catastrophic risks and dangers.
That’s the conclusion of a strongly worded consumer advisory released Monday by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, injecting another dose of skepticism from federal regulators into the debate over the safety of virtual currency that is sure to draw ire from an expanding community of virtual payment devotees.
CFPB’s report warns of the risks of hackers and scams when using bitcoin, and notes the increased volatility in the market because the currencies are not backed or insured by any government entity and because transactions are often anonymous.
Due to bitcoin’s decentralized structure, consumers may have little recourse for recovering stolen or lost investments, according to the advisory.
“With a traditional bank account or payment card, if someone breaches your account, your bank or payment card company will help you recover some or all of your funds,” the report reads. “If you’re storing your virtual currencies on your own computer, you’re basically on your own if your virtual currency is stolen. There is no other party to help you.”
It also declared that “bitcoin ‘ATMs’ are not ATMs at all” and suggested the entire digital currency enterprise was susceptible to Ponzi schemes, citing recent abuses and crashes of prominent exchanges over the past year.
Bitcoin is the most popular brand of digital currencies, which can be swapped for traditional greenbacks or used at a growing number of participating online vendors and brick-and-mortar retailers.
Bitcoin evangelists see it as a quick and innovative form of payment that ducks some banking fees typically associated with online transactions. But regulators have long expressed concern about digital currencies, which they say can provide bad actors with an anonymous way to launder money and participate in drug trafficking.
The advocates downplayed the significance of the CFPB report.
“This is a fairly standard warning,” said Jim Harper, global policy counsel with the Bitcoin Foundation. “I’d love for them to be thoroughly pro-bitcoin, but their job is to warn, and that is what the report does.”
The consumer watchdog also announced it will start taking complaints about digital currency exchanges and wallets, as part of an attempt to better understand the growing market.
Earlier this year, the Government Accountability Office encouraged the consumer bureau to be more hands-on with creating policies related to digital currencies. The bureau, formed under the 2010 Dodd-Frank legislation that overhauled federal regulations of the financial industry, agreed.
What We're Following See More »
In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."