House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy does not make any mention of Congress extending the controversial Export-Import Bank’s charter in a memo Friday to House Republicans titled “Initial September outlook.”
Rather, McCarthy focuses on three other items which, he says, members might “wish to factor into your district events” over this summer recess — including a package that deals with the Keystone XL pipeline and other energy matters.
McCarthy does write that he plans to provide more details of the House’s September agenda later this month — and the list of three items in his memo Friday certainly does not appear to be a complete rundown of what the House will do. For example, Speaker John Boehner has already said the House will take up a continuing resolution when it gets back to keep government funded beyond the Oct. 1 start of the new fiscal year.
But McCarthy’s omission of the Ex-Im Bank is sure to add to the speculation over whether he plans to stick to his claim in June that he intends to let its charter expire this fall. Such a move would appease many House conservatives — including Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling of Texas — who are demanding that the bank not be reauthorized.
But others in the Republican conference are calling for its reauthorization. The Financial Services panel continues to discuss and hold hearings on the Ex-Im Bank’s future.
The Ex-Im bank makes taxpayer-backed loans to help overseas entities buy U.S. products, authorizing roughly $27 billion in fiscal 2013 to back about $37 billion in export sales. Its charter comes due for renewal on Sept. 30.
The three items McCarthy writes that the House will take up and send to the Senate after the return to session, beginning on Sept. 8, are:
- A consolidated energy package “that will, among other things, open federal lands, support the Keystone XL pipeline, and prevent environmental regulations that are killing American-made energy”;
- A “single package of our jobs bills,” designed, says McCarthy, to increase pressure on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to finally put American workers and economic growth first; and
- A bill already reported out of the Energy and Commerce Committee that would, according to the memo, allow those who purchase health care on the group market to keep the plans they had, “just as the president promised.” The memo says last year millions of Americans in the individual insurance market found that wasn’t true, and lost access to the plans they had.
There was no immediate comment from McCarthy’s office beyond the memo.
What We're Following See More »
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.
Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."
In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."