Why Abortion Groups Ignored the Man They Hate

In Tennessee, a scandal-plagued Republican congressman’s seemingly inevitable defeat might have convinced some abortion-opponents they didn’t need to work against him. They were wrong.

Rep. Scott DesJarlais, left, takes a photograph with his iPhone during an oversight committee hearing
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Aug. 7, 2014, 4:05 a.m.

Scott Des­Jar­lais slept with his former pa­tients, en­cour­aged one to have an abor­tion, and twice urged his ex-wife to have an abor­tion. But oddly enough, when it came time for the Ten­ness­ee rep­res­ent­at­ive to run for reelec­tion, the “pro-life” move­ment that had the most reas­on to des­pise him has in­stead giv­en him close to a free pass.

The vast net­work of in­flu­en­tial anti-abor­tion-rights groups, many of which are rarely shy about mak­ing their voices heard, have been re­mark­ably ab­sent from Des­Jar­lais’s primary, a re­view of the 4th Dis­trict con­test shows. In some cases, the groups haven’t provided even so much as en­dorse­ment against the in­cum­bent law­maker, much less con­tri­bu­tions or well-fun­ded in­de­pend­ent ex­pendit­ures.

Their ab­sence has eli­cited con­fu­sion and curi­os­ity among many Re­pub­lic­ans closely watch­ing the race, many of whom are won­der­ing why a law­maker who is the em­bod­i­ment of abor­tion-polit­ics hy­po­crisy hasn’t been more of a tar­get. By Fri­day, that might turn to an­ger: Once con­sidered a long shot, Des­Jar­lais is now seen by some loc­al polit­ic­al strategists as an even bet to win his Thursday primary against state Sen. Jim Tracy.

“This is a race that Tracy should eas­ily win, and he’s not [go­ing to],” said Chip Salts­man, a long­time GOP op­er­at­ive in Ten­ness­ee. “I think it’s a toss-up.”

If Des­Jar­lais does win, it’s a fair as­sump­tion that some of the post­game fin­ger-point­ing will be dir­ec­ted to­ward the anti-abor­tion groups, who will have squandered an op­por­tun­ity to take down a law­maker whose mere pres­ence in Wash­ing­ton opens the move­ment up to cries of hy­po­crisy.

The most glar­ing ab­sence from the 4th Dis­trict primary has been Right to Life, the in­flu­en­tial polit­ic­al group with both na­tion­al and Ten­ness­ee chapters. Neither has so much as en­dorsed Tracy.

In the case of the Ten­ness­ee chapter, Des­Jar­lais has be­nefited from its de­cision to fo­cus this year en­tirely on sup­port for an amend­ment to the state Con­sti­tu­tion that would makes it easi­er to leg­ally re­strict abor­tions. (Voters would have to ap­prove the amend­ment in Novem­ber.) The group’s polit­ic­al arm hasn’t made any en­dorse­ments this elec­tion cycle, ac­cord­ing to its pres­id­ent, Bri­an Har­ris, in part be­cause the time and en­ergy re­quired to sup­port can­did­ates would take away from the drive to pass the amend­ment. He ad­ded that he also feared that sup­port­ing Tracy over Des­Jar­lais would ali­en­ate some of the in­cum­bent’s sup­port­ers and si­phon their sup­port from the amend­ment.

“Across the board, we de­term­ined the best use of our time en­ergy and re­sources was pas­sage of a pro-life amend­ment to the Con­sti­tu­tion,” Har­ris said.

Why the Na­tion­al Right to Life PAC didn’t make an en­dorse­ment is less clear: The group has backed Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der in his con­tested primary on Thursday. On its web­site list­ing en­dorse­ments in Ten­ness­ee House races, it says only to “check back soon for up­dates!” Rep­res­ent­at­ives for the PAC did not re­spond to mul­tiple re­quests for com­ment.

Tracy has re­ceived en­dorse­ments from a hand­ful of groups that op­pose abor­tion-rights, in­clud­ing the Fam­ily Re­search Coun­cil PAC and Amer­ic­an Con­ser­vat­ive Uni­on. The so­cial-con­ser­vat­ive group Con­cerned Wo­men Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Com­mit­tee also bundled about $2,000 for the chal­lenger, and FRC’s PAC con­trib­uted $1,000. But in a con­test where Tracy has raised more than $1 mil­lion, those totals don’t do much to move the needle.

There’s no doubt that Des­Jar­lais’s per­son­al scan­dals al­most crippled his can­did­acy from the get-go. The rev­el­a­tions that he had twice en­cour­aged his former wife to get an abor­tion be­came pub­lic in Novem­ber 2012, a few weeks after his pre­vi­ous elec­tion. His per­son­al life had already been un­der fire from crit­ics, after court tran­scripts showed that Des­Jar­lais, a doc­tor, had once slept with a pa­tient and then urged her to get an abor­tion, and had car­ried on af­fairs with mul­tiple cowork­ers and oth­ers.

By early Janu­ary, Tracy had entered the race — far earli­er than most chal­lengers — and he car­ried the un­of­fi­cial im­prim­at­ur of the GOP es­tab­lish­ment des­pite run­ning against an in­cum­bent. Through mid-Ju­ly, Tracy had raised roughly a $1 mil­lion more than Des­Jar­lais, who had col­lec­ted only a mea­ger $440,000.

But Tracy’s early suc­cess might have ac­tu­ally worked against him, con­vin­cing most groups, in­clud­ing those fo­cused on abor­tion polit­ics, that their money would be bet­ter spent else­where.

“The repu­ta­tion around this race for a very long time has been that Jim Tracy was go­ing to run with it,” said Joe Hall, a Ten­ness­ee GOP strategist. “When that oc­curs, money will sit it out. And de­cisions are made to in­vest else­where where it will have a big­ger ef­fect.”

Oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans sug­gest the scan­dal’s tim­ing, com­ing al­most two years ago, has al­lowed Des­Jar­lais enough time to re­pair his im­age (aided by his 100 per­cent pro-life vot­ing re­cord this ses­sion.) He has been open about his pleas for for­give­ness, which res­on­ates in the heav­ily Chris­ti­an dis­trict, and has re­ceived a con­sid­er­able boost in sup­port from his cur­rent wife, Amy. Her un­waver­ing sup­port of his cam­paign has been cru­cial to his polit­ic­al re­hab­il­it­a­tion, Re­pub­lic­ans said.

“She just softens him up,” said one loc­al GOP op­er­at­ive, who has watched the race closely. “He’s been pretty smart — he car­ries her around all over the dis­trict be­cause she helps him.”

He’s also been helped in part by the dis­trict’s sharp Re­pub­lic­an lean, the kind of con­ser­vat­ive elect­or­ate where na­tion­al strategists don’t worry about hold­ing the seat re­gard­less of who the nom­in­ee is. It’s not ne­ces­sar­ily a slam-dunk that Des­Jar­lais would win reelec­tion in the fall — a source with­in EMILY’s List, the pro-choice Demo­crat­ic wo­men’s group, said they would con­sider back­ing his op­pon­ent should the con­gress­man be the nom­in­ee — but he’s still a strong bet.

Which would be much to the chag­rin of some Re­pub­lic­an crit­ics.

“I can’t be­lieve more pro-life groups didn’t work against Des­Jar­lais based on his lack of char­ac­ter,” said one per­son well con­nec­ted in the pro-life move­ment, who re­ques­ted an­onym­ity to speak can­didly. “The man’s a dirt bag.”

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×