This Is Literally the Formula for Happiness

Simple, right?

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
Aug. 5, 2014, 11:44 a.m.

What is an in­stance of hap­pi­ness? 

That’s a squishy ques­tion philo­soph­ers have dis­cussed for mil­len­nia. Ac­cord­ing to Spark­notes, Ar­is­totle said hap­pi­ness is an end to it­self. The poet Kah­lil Gibran wrote that hap­pi­ness “is your sor­row un­masked,” whatever that means.

Rhet­or­ic aside, re­search­ers at the Uni­versity Col­lege Lon­don say hap­pi­ness (or at least a dis­crete mo­ment of it) is rep­res­en­ted by the for­mula above, re­cently pub­lished in the Pro­ceed­ings of the Na­tion­al Academy of Sci­ences. The gist of that for­mula is this: Hap­pi­ness spikes when we win and our ex­pect­a­tions are low — but that hap­pi­ness gradu­ally fades over time.

To be clear, the sci­ent­ists wer­en’t study­ing over­all life sat­is­fac­tion, but rather the mo­ment­ary joy that comes from win­ning a re­ward.

With MRI ma­chines, the re­search­ers peered in­to the minds of 26 sub­jects who were play­ing a gambling game. Throughout the game, the com­puter asked par­ti­cipants to rate how happy they were on a 1-to-10 scale. The re­search­ers then not-so-simply com­bined brain-activ­ity data with the re­por­ted level of hap­pi­ness, and the par­ti­cipant’s his­tory of suc­cess in the game, and craf­ted the above equa­tion.

What they found was that it wasn’t the over­all amount of money won in the game that gave the par­ti­cipants the greatest hap­pi­ness. The for­mula in­cor­por­ates a “for­get­ting factor” — which pre­dicts that the hap­pi­ness ob­tained from a pre­vi­ous win de­grades over time. Ten more tri­als after a win, the ori­gin­al win “es­sen­tially has no in­flu­ence on cur­rent hap­pi­ness.”

Ac­cord­ing to the for­mula, hap­pi­ness spikes when things go bet­ter than ex­pec­ted. “For ex­ample,” the study con­cludes, “a £0 prize de­creases hap­pi­ness if the al­tern­at­ive was win­ning £2, but in­creases hap­pi­ness if the al­tern­at­ive was los­ing £2.”

Which makes per­fect sense: It’s bet­ter to win when that win avoids a big­ger loss. But what’s sur­pris­ing about this study is that the re­search­ers were then able to use that for­mula to pre­dict the gen­er­al pat­tern of hap­pi­ness in more than 18,000 people play­ing a sim­il­ar game on a smart­phone.

“Con­sist­ent with our pre­vi­ous res­ults,” the study’s au­thors write, “earn­ings in­creased over time but hap­pi­ness did not.” By study­ing the brains of 26 people, the re­search­ers could roughly pre­dict the be­ha­vi­ors of 18,000. 

Nor­mally, the best tool psy­cho­lo­gists have to meas­ure hap­pi­ness in a pa­tient is a ques­tion­naire, which is ex­tremely sub­ject­ive. But this re­search sug­gests there might be a way to peer in­to the mind and quanti­fy joy, which can make for more pre­cise sci­ence in dia­gnos­ing and treat­ing men­tal dis­orders.

Cor­rec­tion: This post ori­gin­ally mis­spelled Kah­lil Gibran.

What We're Following See More »
HIGHLIGHT ISSUES FACING KIDS
FLOTUS to Speak at UN Luncheon
20 hours ago
THE LATEST
PRESSES CASE FOR REFORMS
Trump Meets with UN Leaders
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump on Tuesday night met with UN Secretary Guterres and President of the General Assembly Miroslav Lajcak. In both cases, as per releases from the White House, Trump pressed them on the need to reform the UN bureaucracy.

AT U.N. TRUMP CALLS NUCLEAR DEAL AN “EMBARRASSMENT”
New Iran Policy Coming Next Month?
1 days ago
THE LATEST
“MASSIVE SOURCE OF EMBARRASSMENT”
Trump Calls Out U.N. Members for Human Rights Violations
1 days ago
THE LATEST
LEVELS AN IMPLICIT THREAT AT NORTH KOREA
Trump Calls Kim “Rocket Man” at U.N.
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login