Russia said last week that it wouldn’t “fall into hysterics” over the latest round of U.S. sanctions, but the measures have at least ruffled some feathers.
Chicken feathers that is. Russian officials have alerted the U.S. Department of Agriculture that Russia will more rigorously inspect its imports of American poultry, Politico‘s Bill Tomson reports. In a message to the department, the Russians claimed that salmonella, listeria, and other contaminants have been found on poultry shipped over from the U.S.
The decision appears to be a response to U.S. trade sanctions. Last week, the U.S. Export-Import Bank placed on hold all new American trade deals with Russia and stopped several that were in progress. The Agriculture Department’s Foreign Agricultural Service announced that it has suspended all export credit programs for Russia, which has used them to buy U.S. products.
The Agriculture Department responded by saying all U.S. poultry exports meet Russian standards (of which there are many). Still, American chicken producers are bracing for the economic impact should Russia ban imports altogether by lining up other buyers. “We’d be crazy not to be making calls to alternative markets right now,” Mike Cockrell, CEO of Sanderson Farms, the third-largest poultry producer in the U.S., told Reuters on Monday.
Russia is one of the U.S. poultry industry’s top foreign customers, importing about 200,000 tons of chicken every year. Most of that is dark meat, which appears to have more fans in Russia than stateside. (“A chicken is a chicken,” Russian producers have said.)
U.S. producers have seen this kind of reaction from the Russians before. In 2010, Russia banned all U.S poultry imports for the better part of a year, calling a chlorine-based sanitization process commonly used in the U.S. unhealthy. U.S. chicken producers lost an estimated $400 million in Russian sales thanks to the ban, which was lifted when chlorine was swapped for another microbial solution.
Russian concerns over Western food safety practices often coincide with tense political relations. In 2010, the ban was a point of pride in Russia, eschewing the Soviet-era days of the early 1990s when the first Bush administration sent over American chicken as food aid. During the South Ossetia War in 2008, Russia blacklisted several American chicken producers over U.S. support for Georgia. And in 2002, when the U.S. raised steel tariffs for foreign trade, Russia stopped importing chickens from the U.S.
Banning a country’s products for political reasons would violate regulations of the World Trade Organization, of which the U.S. and Russia are both members. By citing health and safety concerns, Russia can avoid breaking the rules.
What We're Following See More »
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.
Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."
In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."