Why Obama Saying ‘Torture’ Matters

On Friday, the president went further than Senate Intelligence in harshly characterizing CIA abuses, making a powerful statement in the process.

National Journal
James Oliphant
Aug. 1, 2014, 12:47 p.m.

Fri­day wasn’t the first time Pres­id­ent Obama used the word “tor­ture” to de­scribe the “en­hanced in­ter­rog­a­tion tech­niques” used by the Cent­ral In­tel­li­gence Agency against ter­ror­ism sus­pects, but this time might be the most mean­ing­ful.

Obama’s re­marks came at the end of an im­promptu ses­sion with re­port­ers in the White House brief­ing room. Asked about a clas­si­fied Sen­ate re­port that delved in­to CIA ac­tions dur­ing the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, the pres­id­ent re­spon­ded by say­ing the re­port con­cluded that in the af­ter­math of the 9/11 at­tacks, “we did some things that were wrong. We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tor­tured some folks. We did some things that were con­trary to our val­ues.”

Obama made sim­il­ar re­marks last year in a speech at the Na­tion­al De­fense Uni­versity — and, as far back as 2009, he re­ferred to “wa­ter­board­ing” as tor­ture. But it car­ries great­er weight now, with the ex­pect­a­tion that por­tions of the Sen­ate re­port will be de­clas­si­fied in the com­ing days at the ur­ging of the White House.

That re­port, which chron­icles a series of CIA ab­uses, does not use the word “tor­ture” to char­ac­ter­ize ex­cess­ive in­ter­rog­a­tion prac­tices, ac­cord­ing to The Daily Beast. Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, the chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, which con­duc­ted the probe has said its find­ings will re­veal ab­use that is “chilling” and “sys­tem­at­ic and wide­spread.” The re­port is also ex­pec­ted to con­clude that the en­hanced tech­niques were not ef­fect­ive in yield­ing use­ful in­tel­li­gence.

“Tor­ture” and the con­nota­tions it car­ries has been a loaded word polit­ic­ally since George W. Bush’s first term. And Obama’s de­cision to use it im­me­di­ately sparked out­rage from con­ser­vat­ives on Twit­ter. (Obama was also cri­ti­cized for us­ing the col­lo­qui­al “folks” to de­scribe those in­ter­rog­ated.)

But it ap­pears to have been a choice by the pres­id­ent to cast the CIA’s prac­tices in the most bru­tal terms in or­der to make his con­dem­na­tion of them as power­ful as pos­sible, send­ing a sig­nal both at home and abroad that such prac­tices are no longer sanc­tioned. That way, when the re­port does be­come pub­lic, Obama’s words Fri­day will still be echo­ing. At the same time, it likely will do little to mol­li­fy crit­ics who say his ad­min­is­tra­tion has failed to hold CIA agents who con­duc­ted the in­ter­rog­a­tions leg­ally ac­count­able.

Obama also used the oc­ca­sion to sup­port CIA Dir­ect­or John Bren­nan, who apo­lo­gized this week to law­makers after an in­tern­al probe found that CIA agents had broken in­to com­puters used by the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee. At least one mem­ber of that com­mit­tee, Mark Ud­all of Col­or­ado, has called for Bren­nan to resign. But the pres­id­ent seemed to put that mat­ter to rest, for now. “I have full con­fid­ence in John Bren­nan,” Obama said.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×