Democratic Sens. Mark Udall and Martin Heinrich both called for CIA Director John Brennan’s resignation late Thursday after the spy agency admitted it had improperly accessed Senate staffers’ computers used during a review of the agency’s Bush-era interrogation practices.
“After being briefed on the CIA inspector general report today, I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA Director John Brennan,” Udall said in a statement. “The CIA unconstitutionally spied on Congress by hacking into Senate Intelligence Committee computers.”
Additional reports claimed that Sen. Lindsey Graham was also asking Brennan to step down due to the controversy. An aide Thursday denied knowing of any call for resignation, though the South Carolina Republican said in March that “heads should roll, and people should go to jail” if the allegations of CIA hacking proved true.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stopped short of calling for Brennan’s head, but said the CIA’s admission was “appalling and deeply threatening to our system of checks and balances.”
“The CIA’s leadership must take action to address these misdeeds, restore its trust with Congress and ensure that this episode will never, ever be repeated,” Reid added.
Other senators, including Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, have refused comment on whether they believe Brennan should be removed from his post. Sen. Saxby Chambliss, the Intelligence panel’s top Republican, said calls for a resignation were “premature.”
“There are still a lot of undisclosed facts out there,” Chambliss said.
Sen. Susan Collins said she had “been shown no evidence that [Brennan] directed, authorized, or approved of the intrusions themselves, which I consider to be a very serious infringement on Congressional oversight.”
Earlier Thursday, the CIA admitted that its employees had “acted in a manner inconsistent with the common understanding” agreed to between the agency and its Senate overseers, according to CIA spokesman Dean Boyd. The mea culpa marked a sharp reversal of previous denials by Brennan, who said allegations of hacking of Senate computers was “beyond the scope of reason.”
Feinstein earlier this year took to the Senate floor to deliver bombshell allegations that the CIA had secretly accessed her panel’s computers that were being used to review documents related to the government’s torture, detention, and rendition policies allowed during George W. Bush’s presidency. She accused the CIA of impeding her staffers’ investigation and charged the agency with possibly violating the Constitution.
Udall, who serves on the Intelligence panel, was the first senator to state publicly that Brennan should give up his position. The Colorado Democrat is facing reelection this year in a tight race that The Cook Political Report has deemed a Toss-Up.
On Friday, the New York Times editorial board said the CIA had breached the trust of not only Congress but the American public and called for personnel changes.
“One of those heads may need to be Mr. Brennan’s,” the board wrote. “If he knew about the break-in, then he blatantly lied. If he did not, then apparently he was unaware of the lawless culture that has festered within the C.I.A. since the moment it was encouraged by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney to torture suspects and then lie about it.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."