Will the Senate Push John Brennan to Resign From the CIA?

Calls for Brennan’s head began Thursday evening after the spy agency admitted it had hacked into Senate computers.

National Journal
Dustin Volz and Clara Ritger
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz Clara Ritger
July 31, 2014, 1:28 p.m.

Demo­crat­ic Sens. Mark Ud­all and Mar­tin Hein­rich both called for CIA Dir­ect­or John Bren­nan’s resig­na­tion late Thursday after the spy agency ad­mit­ted it had im­prop­erly ac­cessed Sen­ate staffers’ com­puters used dur­ing a re­view of the agency’s Bush-era in­ter­rog­a­tion prac­tices.

“After be­ing briefed on the CIA in­spect­or gen­er­al re­port today, I have no choice but to call for the resig­na­tion of CIA Dir­ect­or John Bren­nan,” Ud­all said in a state­ment. “The CIA un­con­sti­tu­tion­ally spied on Con­gress by hack­ing in­to Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee com­puters.”

Ad­di­tion­al re­ports claimed that Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham was also ask­ing Bren­nan to step down due to the con­tro­versy. An aide Thursday denied know­ing of any call for resig­na­tion, though the South Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an said in March that “heads should roll, and people should go to jail” if the al­leg­a­tions of CIA hack­ing proved true.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id stopped short of call­ing for Bren­nan’s head, but said the CIA’s ad­mis­sion was “ap­palling and deeply threat­en­ing to our sys­tem of checks and bal­ances.”

“The CIA’s lead­er­ship must take ac­tion to ad­dress these mis­deeds, re­store its trust with Con­gress and en­sure that this epis­ode will nev­er, ever be re­peated,” Re­id ad­ded.

Oth­er sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, have re­fused com­ment on wheth­er they be­lieve Bren­nan should be re­moved from his post. Sen. Saxby Cham­b­liss, the In­tel­li­gence pan­el’s top Re­pub­lic­an, said calls for a resig­na­tion were “pre­ma­ture.”

“There are still a lot of un­dis­closed facts out there,” Cham­b­liss said.

Sen. Susan Collins said she had “been shown no evid­ence that [Bren­nan] dir­ec­ted, au­thor­ized, or ap­proved of the in­tru­sions them­selves, which I con­sider to be a very ser­i­ous in­fringe­ment on Con­gres­sion­al over­sight.”

Earli­er Thursday, the CIA ad­mit­ted that its em­ploy­ees had “ac­ted in a man­ner in­con­sist­ent with the com­mon un­der­stand­ing” agreed to between the agency and its Sen­ate over­seers, ac­cord­ing to CIA spokes­man Dean Boyd. The mea culpa marked a sharp re­versal of pre­vi­ous deni­als by Bren­nan, who said al­leg­a­tions of hack­ing of Sen­ate com­puters was “bey­ond the scope of reas­on.”

Fein­stein earli­er this year took to the Sen­ate floor to de­liv­er bomb­shell al­leg­a­tions that the CIA had secretly ac­cessed her pan­el’s com­puters that were be­ing used to re­view doc­u­ments re­lated to the gov­ern­ment’s tor­ture, de­ten­tion, and rendi­tion policies al­lowed dur­ing George W. Bush’s pres­id­ency. She ac­cused the CIA of im­ped­ing her staffers’ in­vest­ig­a­tion and charged the agency with pos­sibly vi­ol­at­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion.

Ud­all, who serves on the In­tel­li­gence pan­el, was the first sen­at­or to state pub­licly that Bren­nan should give up his po­s­i­tion. The Col­or­ado Demo­crat is fa­cing reelec­tion this year in a tight race that The Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port has deemed a Toss-Up.

On Fri­day, the New York Times ed­it­or­i­al board said the CIA had breached the trust of not only Con­gress but the Amer­ic­an pub­lic and called for per­son­nel changes.

“One of those heads may need to be Mr. Bren­nan’s,” the board wrote. “If he knew about the break-in, then he blatantly lied. If he did not, then ap­par­ently he was un­aware of the law­less cul­ture that has festered with­in the C.I.A. since the mo­ment it was en­cour­aged by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney to tor­ture sus­pects and then lie about it.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×