How Massachusetts Is Fighting Back on the Supreme Court’s Abortion Ruling

The state passed a law Wednesday that strengthens protest restrictions around abortion clinics.

Janice Pemberton (C) of Brooklyn, NY, speaks to pro-choice activists with the National Organization For Women at a vigil outside the U.S. Supreme Court on January 23, 2012 in Washington, DC. The vigil was held to mark the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. (Photo by Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Novack
July 30, 2014, 12:49 p.m.

Mas­sachu­setts is not let­ting a Su­preme Court de­cision get in the way of what the state sees as ne­ces­sary pro­tec­tions for abor­tion clin­ics.

Demo­crat­ic Gov. Dev­al Patrick signed a bill in­to law Wed­nes­day that aims to pro­tect pa­tients at re­pro­duct­ive health cen­ters from po­ten­tially dan­ger­ous an­ti­abor­tion pro­test­ers.

The le­gis­la­tion comes in re­sponse to a Su­preme Court rul­ing at the end of last month that struck down a 2007 state law re­quir­ing a 35-foot protest “buf­fer zone” around abor­tion clin­ics. In a un­an­im­ous de­cision, the Court said the law vi­ol­ates the First Amend­ment in part be­cause the buf­fer zones in­clude pub­lic spaces such as side­walks. States could re­spond to spe­cif­ic in­cid­ents, the justices said, but a broad­er re­stric­tion like the Mas­sachu­setts law was deemed un­con­sti­tu­tion­al.

The new Mas­sachu­setts safe-ac­cess law ad­dresses safety con­cerns of abor­tion-rights ad­voc­ates by tight­en­ing se­cur­ity around clin­ics. The le­gis­la­tion in­creases pen­al­ties for ob­struct­ing ac­cess to health cen­ters, and in­creases po­lice au­thor­ity to re­move in­di­vidu­als who block pa­tients.

The state House and Sen­ate passed the bill Tues­day. The Le­gis­lature in­cluded an emer­gency pre­amble, mean­ing that the law takes ef­fect im­me­di­ately.

Planned Par­ent­hood League of Mas­sachu­setts has already be­gun pre­par­ing for the new law by mark­ing off the area where pro­test­ers in vi­ol­a­tion would need to stand tem­por­ar­ily, the or­gan­iz­a­tion said.

The law’s crafters hope it will also serve as a mod­el for oth­er areas with buf­fer-zone laws that have been af­fected by the Su­preme Court rul­ing. These in­clude New Hamp­shire; Port­land, Maine; and Bur­l­ing­ton, Vt., ac­cord­ing to Planned Par­ent­hood Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ica Pres­id­ent Cecile Richards. There are also buf­fer zones in place in about six or sev­en oth­er com­munit­ies around the coun­try, but those have not been af­fected, she said.

An­ti­abor­tion pro­test­ers have already an­nounced they will chal­lenge the new law in court, ac­cord­ing to Mas­sachu­setts At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Martha Coakley, who worked on the le­gis­la­tion. But sup­port­ers of the law are con­fid­ent it will with­stand con­sti­tu­tion­al scru­tiny this time around, and say the tar­geted ap­proach is in keep­ing with the Court’s de­cision.

“The Su­preme Court took one tool away from us last month, but as Mas­sachu­setts has demon­strated, when they take one tool away, we come back with a full tool­box,” Richards said Wed­nes­day.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
11 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×