Rand Paul’s Pitch to Black Voters

Can small-government conservatives find common ground with the socially disadvantaged?

National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
July 25, 2014, 6:39 a.m.

Earli­er this month, Rand Paul told a Ken­tucky crowd, “You’ll find nobody in Con­gress do­ing more for minor­ity rights than me right now — Re­pub­lic­an or Demo­crat.”

It’s part of a pitch — both polit­ic­al and philo­soph­ic­al — that the sen­at­or has been mak­ing to minor­ity voters around the coun­try for the past year.

Speak­ing at the Na­tion­al Urb­an League’s an­nu­al con­fer­ence in Cin­cin­nati on Fri­day, Paul again pushed his agenda for minor­ity rights. There are four planks to Paul’s plat­form: sen­ten­cing re­form, vot­ing rights, school choice, and something he calls Eco­nom­ic Free­dom Zones.

An­oth­er Re­pub­lic­an law­maker tried to fur­ther Re­pub­lic­ans’ poverty agenda with talk of en­ter­prise zones and school vouch­ers — more than 20 years ago. In 1993, Jack Kemp, the ori­gin­al com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vat­ive, made a very sim­il­ar case to the one that GOP law­makers like Paul and Rep. Paul Ry­an of Wis­con­sin are mak­ing today.

The idea be­hind Paul’s Free En­ter­prise Zones, as I’ve writ­ten about be­fore, is to rad­ic­ally lower taxes in areas that have 1.5 times the na­tion­al un­em­ploy­ment rate, which now stands at roughly 9 per­cent. De­troit’s un­em­ploy­ment rate is 14.5 per­cent.

“I think it could trans­form the poverty prob­lem in Amer­ica,” Paul told the crowd Fri­day morn­ing.

To com­bat sen­ten­cing dis­par­it­ies, an un­likely duo of fresh­man sen­at­ors has emerged: Paul and Demo­crat­ic Sen. Cory Book­er of New Jer­sey. To­geth­er, they are push­ing the Re­deem Act, which would help non­vi­ol­ent felons seal their crim­in­al re­cords, thereby help­ing them later in the job mar­ket. Paul also said he is in­tro­du­cing le­gis­la­tion Fri­day that will elim­in­ate the sen­ten­cing dis­par­ity between crack- and powder-co­caine of­fenses.

“Frankly, it’s easi­er to ar­rest and con­vict poor kids in an urb­an en­vir­on­ment,” Paul said. “As a Chris­ti­an I be­lieve in re­demp­tion, and I be­lieve in second chances.”

In Paul’s home state of Ken­tucky, across the river from the Urb­an League con­fer­ence, ex-felons are not al­lowed to vote. In his speech, Paul called it “the biggest im­ped­i­ment to vot­ing in our coun­try.”

Aside from his policy pitches, there was also a philo­soph­ic­al sell in Paul’s speech — that you should not be judged “by the col­or of your skin or the shade of your ideo­logy.”

Put less el­eg­antly, Paul’s idea is that small-gov­ern­ment con­ser­vat­ives face the same kind of dis­crim­in­a­tion as ra­cial minor­it­ies in Amer­ica. They’re in the same boat, fight­ing against the op­press­ive ma­jor­ity, which in Re­pub­lic­ans’ case is big gov­ern­ment.

“Those who have known in­justice should be at the van­guard to pro­tect our civil liber­ties,” Paul told the crowd. His ex­ample: The FBI il­leg­ally tapped Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr.’s phone. Now, the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency is es­sen­tially tap­ping every­one’s phones.

It’s a tough sell, be­cause the ad­vance­ment of minor­ity rights has so of­ten re­quired gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion. And it’s been hard for Paul to es­cape cri­ti­cism for past re­marks on ra­cial is­sues. In his speech, Paul touted his sup­port of the Civil Rights Act.

But in a 2010 in­ter­view, Paul took is­sue with the sec­tion of the act that pro­hib­ited private-busi­ness own­ers from dis­crim­in­at­ing on the basis of race. “I think it’s a bad busi­ness de­cision to ex­clude any­body from your res­taur­ant,” Paul said at the time. “But, at the same time, I do be­lieve in private own­er­ship.”

As Adam Ser­wer wrote in Moth­er Jones last year, that sec­tion of the Civil Rights Act “com­pletely re­shaped Amer­ic­an so­ci­ety.”

Soon after that 2010 in­ter­view, Paul re­versed his stance. But that fact — that re­stric­tions had to be put on busi­nesses to make life some­what less hellish for Amer­ic­an minor­it­ies — is at the root of Paul’s cog­nit­ive dis­son­ance.

Paul wants to sup­port the free mar­ket while also sup­port­ing the so­cially dis­ad­vant­aged. But when those two ob­ject­ives work against each oth­er, his mes­sage gets muddled.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login