One Good Idea: A College Savings Account for Every Child

A study finds that students who had saved between $1 and $500 were four times more likely to graduate than students with no savings at all.

This can only be used with Sophie Quinton's piiece which originally ran in the 7/19/2014 issue of National Journal magazine. Child's bank account for college.
National Journal
Sophie Quinton
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Quinton
July 18, 2014, 1 a.m.

In Feb­ru­ary, Nevada star­ted open­ing a col­lege sav­ings ac­count for every child en­rolled in pub­lic kinder­garten. In March, a private Maine found­a­tion an­nounced it would de­pos­it $500 in­to a 529 ac­count — that is, a col­lege sav­ings plan — for every baby born in the state. And some time dur­ing the next school year, Col­or­ado plans to open col­lege sav­ings ac­counts for about 2,000 low-in­come preschool­ers.

(James Kacz­man)States, cit­ies, and counties hope that start­ing sav­ings ac­counts for kids will en­cour­age par­ents to plan for their chil­dren’s post­sec­ond­ary edu­ca­tion. The amount fam­il­ies save may not mat­ter, says Reg­gie Bicha, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Col­or­ado De­part­ment of Hu­man Ser­vices (which is part­ner­ing with two oth­er state agen­cies on the pi­lot pro­gram). “What mat­ters is that they learn early about the im­port­ance of sav­ing — that they see col­lege as a real­ity in their chil­dren’s fu­ture.”

In­deed, re­search sug­gests that even small nest eggs can in­crease the odds that a child will earn a de­gree. A 2013 Uni­versity of Kan­sas ana­lys­is of the Pan­el Study of In­come Dy­nam­ics, a long-run­ning sur­vey, found that low- and middle-in­come stu­dents who had saved between $1 and $500 for col­lege were over three times more likely to en­roll and four times more likely to gradu­ate than stu­dents with no sav­ings.

Re­search­ers at Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity in St. Louis are con­duct­ing a ran­dom­ized con­trolled tri­al to test the ef­fect of giv­ing new­borns 529 ac­counts. Thirty months after the ex­per­i­ment began, 16 per­cent of fam­il­ies that re­ceived $1,000 in a state-owned ac­count had opened up 529 ac­counts of their own, and about 8 per­cent had star­ted to save in them.

Those per­cent­ages may sound small, but in most states only about 3 to 4 per­cent of chil­dren un­der 18 have a 529 ac­count in their name, says Mi­chael Sher­raden, dir­ect­or of the Cen­ter for So­cial De­vel­op­ment at Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity. Fam­il­ies giv­en a state-owned ac­count were more likely to open (and use) an ac­count of their own. In gen­er­al, wealth­i­er and more-edu­cated par­ents were more likely to be­gin and use ac­counts, but the re­search­ers also found that re­ceiv­ing a state ac­count in­spired some less-well-off fam­il­ies to open ac­counts. Chil­dren who re­ceived ac­counts in the study showed bet­ter so­cial and emo­tion­al de­vel­op­ment by age 4 than those who didn’t, and their moth­ers were less likely to de­vel­op symp­toms of de­pres­sion.

“What mat­ters is that they learn early about the im­port­ance of sav­ing — that they see col­lege as a real­ity in their chil­dren’s fu­ture.”

Reg­gie Bicha, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Col­or­ado De­part­ment of Hu­man Ser­vices

The idea that the gov­ern­ment should es­tab­lish sav­ings ac­counts for all chil­dren has been cir­cu­lat­ing since the 1990s. In 2005, a bi­par­tis­an group of sen­at­ors pro­posed cre­at­ing sav­ings ac­counts for every new­born, but the idea didn’t be­come law. While sup­port at the fed­er­al level has stalled, loc­al pro­grams have taken off — in San Fran­cisco; in Cuyahoga County, Ohio; across the KIPP charter-school net­work.

It’s still not clear how best to design these ac­counts or what level of pub­lic, private, or fam­ily con­tri­bu­tions will make the biggest dif­fer­ence. Bicha’s team has pro­posed a three-year pi­lot in Col­or­ado that — like many sim­il­ar pro­grams — would op­er­ate as a pub­lic-private part­ner­ship. The state would open 529 ac­counts for chil­dren at­tend­ing state-fun­ded preschool, and private donors would match a por­tion of fam­ily sav­ings with dona­tions. (To be eli­gible for the Col­or­ado preschool pro­gram, chil­dren must be from dis­ad­vant­aged fam­il­ies.)

Bicha hopes to prove that the link between sav­ing for col­lege and do­ing well in school will hold for very young chil­dren. He wants “to show that chil­dren who have a chil­dren’s sav­ings ac­count “¦ will be more likely to be pre­pared for kinder­garten on our kinder­garten as­sess­ment, that they’ll be more likely to read in third grade when we do our third-grade read­ing scores.” Most of all, he wants more par­ents to be­lieve that their preschool­er is col­lege bound.

What We're Following See More »
WON’T INTERFERE IN STRUCTURING NSC OFFICE
White House to Give McMaster Carte Blanche
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
RESTROOM ISSUES RETURN
Trump To Rescind Trans Protections
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is planning to reverse an Obama-era order requiring that schools allow students to use the bathroom that coincides with their gender identity. Trump "has green-lighted the plan for the Justice Department and Education Department to send a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools rescinding the guidance." A case is going before the Supreme Court on March 28 in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school student, is suing his high school for forbidding him to use the men's room.

Source:
NAIVE, RISK TAKER
Russia Compiling Dossier on Trump’s Mind
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."

Source:
“HORRIBLE” AND “PAINFUL”
Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
COULD COME TUESDAY
Trump Set To Issue New Travel Ban
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is set to issue a new and more focused executive order clarifying the scope of his travel ban, hoping that the order will survive legal challenges. The new order would focus on the same seven countries, "but would only bar entry to those without a visa and who have never entered the United States before. Unlike the original order, people from those countries who already have permanent U.S. residency (green cards) or visas would not face any restrictions." Some lawyers believe the government will now have much stronger standing, though lawyers who challenged the initial order see the same core problems with the forthcoming ban.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login