In February, Nevada started opening a college savings account for every child enrolled in public kindergarten. In March, a private Maine foundation announced it would deposit $500 into a 529 account — that is, a college savings plan — for every baby born in the state. And some time during the next school year, Colorado plans to open college savings accounts for about 2,000 low-income preschoolers.
(James Kaczman)States, cities, and counties hope that starting savings accounts for kids will encourage parents to plan for their children’s postsecondary education. The amount families save may not matter, says Reggie Bicha, executive director of the Colorado Department of Human Services (which is partnering with two other state agencies on the pilot program). “What matters is that they learn early about the importance of saving — that they see college as a reality in their children’s future.”
Indeed, research suggests that even small nest eggs can increase the odds that a child will earn a degree. A 2013 University of Kansas analysis of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a long-running survey, found that low- and middle-income students who had saved between $1 and $500 for college were over three times more likely to enroll and four times more likely to graduate than students with no savings.
Researchers at Washington University in St. Louis are conducting a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of giving newborns 529 accounts. Thirty months after the experiment began, 16 percent of families that received $1,000 in a state-owned account had opened up 529 accounts of their own, and about 8 percent had started to save in them.
Those percentages may sound small, but in most states only about 3 to 4 percent of children under 18 have a 529 account in their name, says Michael Sherraden, director of the Center for Social Development at Washington University. Families given a state-owned account were more likely to open (and use) an account of their own. In general, wealthier and more-educated parents were more likely to begin and use accounts, but the researchers also found that receiving a state account inspired some less-well-off families to open accounts. Children who received accounts in the study showed better social and emotional development by age 4 than those who didn’t, and their mothers were less likely to develop symptoms of depression.
“What matters is that they learn early about the importance of saving — that they see college as a reality in their children’s future.”
Reggie Bicha, executive director of the Colorado Department of Human Services
The idea that the government should establish savings accounts for all children has been circulating since the 1990s. In 2005, a bipartisan group of senators proposed creating savings accounts for every newborn, but the idea didn’t become law. While support at the federal level has stalled, local programs have taken off — in San Francisco; in Cuyahoga County, Ohio; across the KIPP charter-school network.
It’s still not clear how best to design these accounts or what level of public, private, or family contributions will make the biggest difference. Bicha’s team has proposed a three-year pilot in Colorado that — like many similar programs — would operate as a public-private partnership. The state would open 529 accounts for children attending state-funded preschool, and private donors would match a portion of family savings with donations. (To be eligible for the Colorado preschool program, children must be from disadvantaged families.)
Bicha hopes to prove that the link between saving for college and doing well in school will hold for very young children. He wants “to show that children who have a children’s savings account “¦ will be more likely to be prepared for kindergarten on our kindergarten assessment, that they’ll be more likely to read in third grade when we do our third-grade reading scores.” Most of all, he wants more parents to believe that their preschooler is college bound.
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”