The Senate Is Trying to Tax What You Buy Online — Again

A group of senators has offered a new bill that would widen states’ ability to tax online purchases.

The Amazon homepage appears on a screen in Washington on September 3, 2010.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
July 16, 2014, 10:01 a.m.

Your In­ter­net ac­cess will soon be forever free from gov­ern­ment taxes — un­less the Sen­ate gets in the way.

Boost­ers of tax-free In­ter­net con­nec­tions barely had time to cel­eb­rate a ma­jor win in the House this week be­fore a threat to its sur­viv­al emerged overnight in the up­per cham­ber.

On Tues­day, the House passed a bill by voice vote that would make per­man­ent an ex­pir­ing ban on fed­er­al, state, and loc­al tax­a­tion of In­ter­net ac­cess. The pop­u­lar meas­ure is primed and ready for con­sid­er­a­tion in the Sen­ate, where a sim­il­ar bill sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden has tal­lied more than 50 co­spon­sors.

But just hours after the House bill passed, a group of bi­par­tis­an sen­at­ors in­tro­duced a new bill link­ing the tax ban to a more com­plic­ated and con­tro­ver­sial push to strengthen the power of states to tax on­line pur­chases of items like books, fur­niture, and elec­tron­ics to help close budget short­falls.

The swift man­euver amounts to a last-ditch ef­fort to re­vive the stalled on­line-sales-tax le­gis­la­tion, which passed the Sen­ate last year but has gained little trac­tion since. But it also cleaves the co­ali­tion that sup­ports a morator­i­um on tax­ing In­ter­net ac­cess — and it could prove a bur­den­some hurdle that stalls any ex­ten­sion from reach­ing the pres­id­ent’s desk be­fore the ban ex­pires later this year.

The Mar­ket­place and In­ter­net Tax Fair­ness Act, in­tro­duced by Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mi­chael En­zi, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip Sen. Dick Durbin, and a hand­ful of oth­ers, would al­low states to levy a sales tax on on­line pur­chases from out-of-state re­tail­ers. Cur­rent law dic­tates that states can­not en­force a sales tax on on­line mer­chand­ise bought from a com­pany that does not have a phys­ic­al loc­a­tion with­in the same state.

In ad­di­tion, the bill would ex­tend for 10 years the morator­i­um on tax­ing In­ter­net ac­cess, which is set to ex­pire Nov. 1. Un­like the House of­fer­ing, it would not make the tax ban per­man­ent.

The plan to broaden states’ abil­ity to tax on­line sales has been per­col­at­ing in Con­gress for years, and it has earned in­flu­en­tial back­ing from tra­di­tion­al re­tail­ers as well as the on­line be­hemoth Amazon. Oth­er on­line re­tail­ers such as eBay and a num­ber of an­ti­tax groups op­pose the meas­ure.

But des­pite the Sen­ate ac­tion last year, the House has yet to act on the mat­ter. The Per­man­ent In­ter­net Tax Free­dom Act that passed the lower cham­ber on Tues­day was viewed as a pos­sible piggy­back ride for an on­line-sales-tax amend­ment. But House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte, the bill’s spon­sor, has res­isted at­tempts to tack it on, des­pite a hear­ing in March ex­amin­ing the is­sue.

Adding pres­sure to En­zi and Durbin’s ef­fort: Mak­ing the tax ban on In­ter­net ac­cess per­man­ent, as the House bill does, means law­makers might not have an­oth­er chance to lever­age the is­sue to pro­mote an on­line-sales tax.

But in­dic­a­tions are that Good­latte and House lead­er­ship feel they have a strong hand, bolstered by the loom­ing dead­line on the ac­cess-tax morator­i­um. Fol­low­ing the in­tro­duc­tion of the Sen­ate bill, Good­latte re­it­er­ated in a state­ment his hope that the up­per cham­ber would pass a clean ver­sion of his per­man­ent ban be­fore the morator­i­um ex­pires Nov. 1.

Wyden, the cham­pi­on of the Sen­ate’s tax-ac­cess ban, used a state­ment ap­plaud­ing the House’s ac­tion to take a force­ful swipe at any ef­fort to pair it with an on­line-sales-tax meas­ure.

“It is so im­port­ant to re­ject ap­proaches like the Mar­ket­place Fair­ness Act that passed the Sen­ate last year, which would fun­da­ment­ally dis­crim­in­ate against states that do not levy a sales tax and against U.S. com­pan­ies versus their for­eign com­pet­it­ors,” the Ore­gon Demo­crat said. “It would amount to a body blow to on­line re­tail­ers and ser­vices across the coun­try.”

Wyden chairs the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee, which holds jur­is­dic­tion over on­line tax is­sues. Op­pon­ents of on­line-sales-tax le­gis­la­tion ex­pect Wyden and Good­latte to work in tan­dem to block an amend­ment to their clean tax-ac­cess meas­ure.

Re­tail­ers and oth­ers lob­by­ing hard for the on­line-sales tax still be­lieve there is a way for­ward, however, and they in­sist the le­gis­la­tion is a “near cous­in” of the push to ban In­ter­net-ac­cess taxes. And hav­ing Durbin — the second-most power­ful Demo­crat in the Sen­ate — on their side provides some ne­ces­sary muscle that could help the meas­ure over­come op­pos­i­tion from Wyden and the House.

“I’m not that con­cerned about this end­ing in a stale­mate,” said Dav­id French, seni­or vice pres­id­ent of gov­ern­ment af­fairs at the Na­tion­al Re­tail Fed­er­a­tion. “I think there’s a path for­ward, and our Sen­ate spon­sors are com­mit­ted to get­ting this done.”

What We're Following See More »
HE ADMITS TO A SETTLEMENT
Pelosi Calls for Ethics Investigation of Conyers
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has called for an ethics investigation of Rep. John Conyers, amidst reports that the Michigan Democrat settled sexual harassment charges. "My office resolved the allegations — with an express denial of liability — in order to save all involved from the rigors of protracted litigation," Conyers admitted, after first denying any knowledge of the charges.

Source:
TO BE VOTED ON NEXT MONTH
Pai Officially Announces Intent to Scrap Net Neutrality Rules
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
SAYS HE’S UNAWARE OF ACCUSATIONS
Conyers Denies Settling Harassment Claims
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
SPEAKER SAYS IN LETTER
Mugabe Resigns, Ending Impeachment Debate
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
HAITIANS TO BE MOST AFFECTED
White House to End TPS Program
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is ending a humanitarian program that has allowed some 59,000 Haitians to live and work in the United States since an earthquake ravaged their country in 2010, Homeland Security officials said on Monday. Haitians with what is known as Temporary Protected Status will be expected to leave the United States by July 2019 or face deportation. ... About 320,000 people now benefit from the Temporary Protected Status program, which was signed into law by President George Bush in 1990."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login