Here’s How NASA Thinks We’ll Find Aliens

The agency thinks we’ll find life on other planets soon, but we may not be exchanging messages for a while.

We can't phone E.T.'s home just yet, but NASA thinks we may not be far from finding it.
National Journal
Alex Brown
July 16, 2014, 1 a.m.

When earth­lings fi­nally dis­cov­er their ali­en neigh­bors, it prob­ably won’t be aboard a warp-speed space­ship or via in­ter­galactic Morse code.

The more likely — and de­cidedly less sexy — scen­ario, sci­ent­ists said at a Monday NASA pan­el, is a gi­ant space-based tele­scope find­ing a plan­et with gases in the at­mo­sphere that in­dic­ate life.

“We are look­ing for bio­lo­gic­al sig­na­tures, gases that are pro­duced by life,” said Sara Seager, a plan­et­ary sci­ent­ist at the Mas­sachu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy. “We’re look­ing for whatever’s out there that will be gen­er­at­ing gases in the at­mo­sphere.”

And since our search at the mo­ment ex­tends to about 200 light-years away, it may be a long, long time be­fore we find out what that life looks like.

So where does our search start?

Ac­cord­ing to NASA, we’re well on our way. The agency’s plan in­volves a series of tele­scopes, each big­ger and bet­ter than the last. After one nar­rows down the search, the next will fol­low up with more de­tailed find­ings — un­til even­tu­ally one of them con­firms that we’re not alone.

That all star­ted with the Hubble Space Tele­scope, launched in 1990. It’s been fol­lowed by the Spitzer and Kepler tele­scopes. Their find­ings have helped us learn more about galax­ies, stars, and sol­ar sys­tems — and where we might find “Earth 2.0.”

Thanks to Kepler, we know that our Milky Way galaxy has something like 100 bil­lion plan­ets — know­ledge we didn’t have five years ago. An­oth­er im­port­ant dis­cov­ery? “We ac­tu­ally know now what life might look like,” said Matt Moun­tain, a NASA tele­scope sci­ent­ist. “We know life can im­print it­self on the at­mo­sphere of plan­ets go­ing around oth­er stars. This is what a liv­ing plan­et looks like.”

Es­sen­tially, Kepler has taken a census of nearby stars, giv­ing the next tele­scope a cata­log from which to search. NASA be­lieves 10-20 per­cent of those stars have an Earth-like plan­et in the hab­it­able zone. That’s the area that’s “not too hot, not too cold, just right for life,” Seager said, though there’s some dis­pute over where the bound­ar­ies of that zone start and end.

So what’s the next tele­scope in the queue? That would be TESS, the Trans­it­ing Exo­plan­et Sur­vey Satel­lite, sched­uled to launch in 2017. Its job is to watch about half a mil­lion nearby stars, look­ing for tem­por­ary drops in bright­ness that could in­dic­ate an or­bit­ing plan­et is passing in front. TESS will find about 1,000 stars that will serve as a search list for the next tele­scope in line.

A year later, our best and bright­est hope so far will con­tin­ue the search. The James Webb Space Tele­scope comes in at 6.5 meters, more than twice the size of Hubble. Its 18 hexagon­al mir­rors will give sci­ent­ists a much broad­er view of light wavelengths as they search the sky. “The James Webb Tele­scope will trans­form our view of the uni­verse,” said John Grun­sfeld, a former as­tro­naut and cur­rent mem­ber of NASA’s sci­ence team.

NASA’s team will use the tele­scope to look for signs of life — blue sky, oxy­gen, car­bon di­ox­ide, sul­fur di­ox­ide, plant life, li­quid wa­ter — as the light of a star be­hind a plan­et fil­ters through its at­mo­sphere and ex­poses its char­ac­ter­ist­ics. This is known as trans­it spec­tro­scopy.

It’s still a long shot. “We have to get really lucky,” Seager said. “With the James Webb we have our first chance, our first cap­ab­il­ity, of find­ing life on an­oth­er plan­et. Now nature just has to provide for us.”

That’s where things get tricky. It’s really hard to get a good look at plan­ets, which are around 10 bil­lion times faint­er than the stars they circle. And even though our galaxy has an abund­ance of Earth-like plan­ets (the “holy grail” of our ali­en search, as Grun­sfeld put it, though not the only can­did­ates for sup­port­ing life), we don’t know how dif­fi­cult it is for life to get a foothold. In oth­er words, we could find many Earth twins be­fore we dis­cov­er one with any­body home.

And even the James Webb can only see so much. It will prob­ably take an­oth­er gen­er­a­tion or two of satel­lites be­fore our odds really start to go up. The is­sue is size. “You need big­ger tele­scopes, you need more col­lect­ing area,” said Dave Galla­gh­er, who works in NASA’s Jet Propul­sion Labor­at­ory. “You’ve gotta get big­ger.”

But it’s not just as simple as scal­ing up. Big­ger satel­lites need big­ger rock­ets, and even then the tele­scopes are nowhere close to fit­ting in a des­ig­nated pay­load area. The 6.5-meter James Webb, once de­ployed, will have to go through a com­plex un­fold­ing pro­cess be­fore it reaches its full size. Sol­ar pan­els splay out from the sides, cables pull out a five-lay­er sun­shield in­to place, and the fol­ded-back mir­rors come to­geth­er. It’s es­sen­tially like build­ing a ship in a bottle, then re­mov­ing it in space. “This is what it takes to get a big tele­scope in­to a not-big-enough rock­et,” said John Math­er, Webb’s seni­or pro­ject sci­ent­ist.

Big­ger rock­ets, like the gi­ant Space Launch Sys­tem, will help fu­ture pay­loads get to space. And the next planned mis­sion after the James Webb Tele­scope, an in­frared tele­scope in 2024, will meas­ure only 2.4 meters. Be­cause the bright­ness of stars tends to make their plan­ets in­vis­ible, these mis­sions will only be able to ob­serve plan­ets much lar­ger than Earth or­bit­ing stars much smal­ler than the sun. “Some­how we need to block out that star­light,” Seager said.

To have a real shot, sci­ent­ists say we’ll even­tu­ally need a tele­scope that meas­ures 16 or 20 meters. Moun­tain showed a graph­ic dis­play­ing the num­ber of nearby, po­ten­tially hab­it­able plan­ets the James Webb Tele­scope is cap­able of view­ing. The screen showed only a hand­ful. “How lucky do we feel?” he asked. “With a 20-meter tele­scope, we can see hun­dreds of Earth-like plan­ets around oth­er stars. That’s what it takes to find life.”

The large tele­scope is part of the New Worlds Mis­sion. This plan in­volves a sep­ar­ate satel­lite with fol­dout petals tens of meters in dia­met­er, much like the shape of a sun­flower. That shape is spe­cific­ally de­signed to dif­fract stars’ rays and let only plan­ets’ light through. That satel­lite, known as a star­shade, would sep­ar­ate from the tele­scope and fly tens of thou­sands of kilo­met­ers away. Then the tele­scope would point at it, us­ing the star­shade as a fil­ter to bet­ter cap­ture im­ages from plan­ets.

The star­shade/gi­ant satel­lite plan is still in the works, and for now, sci­ent­ists are ex­cited about the res­ults they plan to get from the James Webb Tele­scope. And wheth­er it’s Webb or a suc­cessor that first finds an in­hab­ited plan­et, they’re con­fid­ent that mo­ment will come. “It’s highly im­prob­able in the lim­it­less vast­ness of the uni­verse that we hu­mans stand alone,” said NASA Ad­min­is­trat­or Charles Bolden. “I find it hard to be­lieve that we’re in this world alone.”

Moun­tain put it in more ro­mantic terms. “Just ima­gine the mo­ment when we find po­ten­tial sig­na­tures of life,” he said. “Ima­gine the mo­ment when the world wakes up and the hu­man race real­izes that its long loneli­ness in time and space may be over — the pos­sib­il­ity we’re no longer alone in the uni­verse.”

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×